The paper, the poll and the almighty ACT stuff-up

Ahead of the ACT election, The Canberra Times called it as an easy Labor victory based on its "exclusive poll". The poll was way out. So what went wrong?

Cathy Alexander — Freelance journalist and PhD candidate in politics at the University of Melbourne

Cathy Alexander

Freelance journalist and PhD candidate in politics at the University of Melbourne

Two days before the ACT election, The Canberra Times splashed with the results of an exclusive opinion poll: "Labor will hold power," ran the front-page headline. The Patterson Research poll tipped Labor would coast to victory with the help of the Greens, who would retain their four seats, while the Liberals would make little headway. Previously, some commentators and bloggers had argued it would be a close race as the Liberals gained traction and the Greens struggled. Those forecasts were junked. The poll set the result in stone before ballots were cast on October 20. Sportsbet paid out on a Labor victory -- the day before the election. There was just one problem. The poll was wrong. The Liberals won more votes than Labor; the major parties tied on eight seats apiece. The Greens haemorrhaged votes and lost three of their four seats (see a comparison of the poll with the results here). The parties are now negotiating over who will form government, and while the most likely result is a Labor-Greens alliance there is a chance the Liberals could form a government. The fiasco of The Canberra Times' dud poll -- the sole opinion poll of the campaign, in the territory's sole daily newspaper -- raises questions around the national obsession with polls, along with questions on the way they are conducted and reported on. Psephologists are scratching their heads, the ACT Liberals are fuming and The Crimes has gone very quiet. ABC election analyst Antony Green told Crikey the poll was clearly wrong and pollsters and the paper had "egg on their face". "Opinion polls should be published on the astrology page," said Green (who, it should be noted, reported on the poll on his election blog). The image below shows The Canberra Times election result prediction on the left (from October 18) and the actual result on the right: 

Some quotes from The Canberra Times on October 18:

Free Trial

You've hit members-only content.

Sign up for a FREE 21-day trial to keep reading and get the best of Crikey straight to your inbox

By starting a free trial, you agree to accept Crikey’s terms and conditions


Leave a comment

10 thoughts on “The paper, the poll and the almighty ACT stuff-up

  1. JMNO

    It’s not the first time a newspaper has got an election result very wrong. In Aug-Sept 1999, The Age wrote every day about the impending landslide re-election of Jeff Kennett, the only question was how big. In fact it was the election that saw Bracks take government with the support of 3 Independents.

  2. bluepoppy

    1203 random poll participants hardly seems enough to form a result. Also goes to show that tweaking based on ‘demographics’ is not a simple task and fails to take into account many variants within those demographics.

  3. paddy

    Ha ha. Now is perhaps NOT the time to email Crikey a powerpoint stating “our record is pretty good”.

  4. Limited News

    Statistically 1203 is more than enough. One Labor MLA made the same prediction as the Canberra Times at a dinner about 10 days prior to the election. So Labor polling was saying the same thing. ie the electorate wasn’t paying much attention and changed its mind in the final week. The “Make Labor Listen” effect kicked in, just like when Follett lost in 1995.

  5. el tel

    People routinely tell pollsters they will vote Greens, so they look like they have “politically correct” attitudes, and then vote for one of the “old parties”. In the UK, it was called the “shy Tory effect”, but it seems to also be becoming a “shy ALP effect’.

  6. Widow Twankey

    Is it co-incidence that your graphic of the ACT assembly most closely resembles a toilet seat?

  7. AR

    Like the Dismal unScience, never known to have made a correction prediction, even in hindsight, opinion polling is, as the name suggests, opinion subject to the weather,breakfast or a nasty run-in with a stroppy lift attendent. IOW, not worth a pinch of the proverbial so why Crikey, using OUR subscription, pays a zac or wastes a kb drivelling this crap is beyond me.

  8. Thteribl

    Im some respectable democracies, publication of “opinion polls” during an election is banned. Might we not improve our democracy by not licensing “group think” instead of serious consideration of the real issues ? Don’t tell me the news media have nothing else to talk about . . . or then again maybe they really don’t . . . Hmmm .

  9. Edward James

    Publicist are generally income seekers, not philanthropist. Our governments / politicians have lots of other peoples money to spend on their publicity. Edward James

  10. Were Rat

    Polls are unreliable and they sway voters. They provide no useful purpose other than guaranteeing a front-page story by their being commissioned “LIBS up 2%” “LIBS and LABOR hold even” “LABOR up 2%”. Besides generating filler they serve no useful purpose and worse are are like shouting ‘fire’ in a crowded theatre.

Share this article with a friend

Just fill out the fields below and we'll send your friend a link to this article along with a message from you.

Your details

Your friend's details