Crikey Says

Oct 17, 2012

Crikey says: king Rupert rides again (and again)

The big contest is in New York: a crucial debate between Romney and Obama. The no-contest was in LA: Rupert dismissing dissenters with the wave of a wrinkled hand. We're at both. And then there's Gillard v Abbott: Bernard Keane says it's a generational change. Unlike at News Corp.

“… the king on his throne, surrounded by courtiers who laugh at his every joke. One by one, his loyal subjects approach and throw themselves at his mercy. Praising his wisdom and kindness, they beg to be heard. The king waves his hand, the courtiers laugh again and the petitioner’s claim is dismissed.”

Such is the rule of one Rupert Keith Murdoch. Paul Barry, sunning himself at News Corporation’s annual general meeting in Los Angeles for Crikey, sums it up well.

Free Trial

Proudly annoying those in power since 2000.

Sign up for a FREE 21-day trial to keep reading and get the best of Crikey straight to your inbox

By starting a free trial, you agree to accept Crikey’s terms and conditions


Leave a comment

6 thoughts on “Crikey says: king Rupert rides again (and again)

  1. Pete from Sydney

    the dotty 80 year old? Not sure about that…and clearly he’s correct you can sell your shares if you don’t like it. the 45% you made can be invested in Crikey perhaps

  2. klewso

    Did they play Grieg’s “Peer Gynt” when He entered his Hall?

  3. Mike Smith

    “When you buy the stock, you know what the company is. If you don’t like it, don’t buy the stock.”

    Ok, Rupert, would you like us to sell the stock? I don’t think you’d enjoy widespread naked short selling on NewsLtd…

  4. klewso

    “Democracy is for wimps!”

  5. AR

    Hypocrisy reigns, not from King Mudorc but the shareholders who lurve the 45% gain whilst decrying the scandalous nature of the organisation from which they benefit.
    As the Mittbot said today in the the debate with BO, “Have you looked at your pension?”
    Few do and even fewer demand that it not be invested in the moist reprehensible stocks, companies which destroy & degrade & diminish the integrity of the planet.

  6. dazza

    Should I be surprised the News Ltd journalists are very quite on this one. Why isn’t accountability questioned by these gutless hacks at murdock press? Let’s put these questions to them and let them squirm a little.

Share this article with a friend

Just fill out the fields below and we'll send your friend a link to this article along with a message from you.

Your details

Your friend's details