Crikey
INQ
  • Subscribe
  • Sign in
Subscribe
  • Politics
    • Immigration
    • Defence
    • Education
    • Energy
    • Environment
    • Health
    • Welfare
  • Business
    • Economy
    • Markets
    • Companies
  • Media
    • Advertising
    • Digital
    • Print
    • Journalism
    • Glenn Dyer’s TV Ratings
    • TV & Radio
  • State Politics
    • Australian Capital Territory
    • New South Wales
    • Victoria
    • Queensland
    • Western Australia
    • Tasmania
    • Northern Territory
    • South Australia
  • INQ
    • About INQ
    • Travels with George
    • The Big Stack
    • The Dark-Art of Lobbying
  • Features
    • Prying Eyes
    • Holy Wars
    • The Art of the Interview
    • Up Yours with Helen Razer
    • Beating the Bandits
    • Shooting Tsars
  • Culture
    • Film & TV
    • Food & Travel
    • The Arts
  • World
    • Asia
    • Pacific
    • North America
    • South America
    • Africa
    • Middle East
    • Europe
  • Crikey Newsletters
    • Crikey Worm
    • Crikey Daily
    • Crikey Weekender
    • Side View
  • Start your Free Trial
  • Sign in
  • Subscribe
  • Give the gift of Crikey
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Tip off
  • About Crikey
  • Careers
  • Contact Crikey
Scroll to top
Sign in
Forgot password?

Talking Points

  • Coronavirus
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Health
  • Media
  • Culture
  • World
First Dog On The Moon

Suffer little children to come unto me, and forbid them not: for of such is the kingdom of God

First Dog On The Moon

Oct 12, 2012

18

Share

Topics

18 comments

Leave a comment Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.
Not already subscribed? Get your free trial, access everything immediately

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.

18 thoughts on “Suffer little children to come unto me, and forbid them not: for of such is the kingdom of God”

  • 1
  • 2
  • Next
  1. ianjohnno1
    October 12, 2012 at 1:05 pm

    Love the wolf in priest’s clothing (if that’s what it’s meant to be).

    Log in to Reply
  2. SBH
    October 12, 2012 at 1:21 pm

    I’m offended by the portrayal of His Eminence the Archbishop of Sydney, George Pell AC as a dog. I like dogs

    Log in to Reply
  3. Stevo the Working Twistie
    October 12, 2012 at 1:46 pm

    I don’t think that’s an Archdog, more like an Archweasel. Or maybe an Arch-hamster: they are known to devour their young.

    Log in to Reply
  4. paddy
    October 12, 2012 at 2:28 pm

    I suppose we should just be grateful that his eminence is not drawn to resemble seafood.
    Good to have you back FD.

    Log in to Reply
  5. zut alors
    October 12, 2012 at 3:06 pm

    ‘You know you’re in trouble when the Victorian Police call you corrupt and violent.’

    Thanks for today’s belly laugh, Mr Dog.

    As to the philosophical question of which religion is worse: ALL of them.

    Log in to Reply
  6. drmick
    October 12, 2012 at 3:17 pm

    The squawking prostate was perfectly demonstrating a painfully obvious trait in all the “popular” religions, (including his own); they are the creation of dried up old men who hate or do not respect women. They all pretend to be based on “love” and “peace” but they all have the same dried up old tenets of deranged, psychopathic, sour old men. They hide behind their “rules”/sacrements/fatwahs to justify the exact opposite of peace & love. All the horrors performed in the name of religion over the centuries continue unabated; they just have different weapons now. The victims are the same though.

    Log in to Reply
  7. Andrew L
    October 12, 2012 at 3:25 pm

    Gumpy old men (often in frocks) who practice sophistry – key component of all religions (including where T. Cruise fills the gig) – same same)

    Log in to Reply
  8. ernmalleyscat
    October 12, 2012 at 3:48 pm

    Zoroastrianism is the worst religion.
    Anyone who reckons Mazda is better than Ford is a deadset nong.

    Log in to Reply
  9. paddy
    October 12, 2012 at 3:48 pm

    @drmick….Standing ovation!

    Log in to Reply
  10. Microseris
    October 12, 2012 at 4:22 pm

    For a man of god, he seems selective in his morals.

    Australian Reforming Catholics described him: “he is rather a nasty man with very few redeeming features”.

    Log in to Reply
  • 1
  • 2
  • Next
Crikey
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Media
  • Culture
  • About Crikey
  • Careers
  • Advertise
  • Contact us
Follow Crikey
Crikey Level 6, 22 William St, Melbourne, 3000 Australia
Ph: (03) 8623 9900
  • Submission guidelines
  • Moderation guidelines
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Privacy policy
  • Privacy collection notice
  • Code of Conduct
  • Terms of use
  • Anonymous News Tip Line

Copyright © 2020 Crikey

  • Private Media
  • The Mandarin
  • SmartCompany
  • StartupSmart
Send to a Friend

Share this article with a friend

Just fill out the fields below and we'll send your friend a link to this article along with a message from you.