New South Wales

Sep 21, 2012

Greens crack-up in Sydney as SHY backs rival candidate

Was Sarah Hanson-Young backing a rival candidate to the Greens for the upcoming Sydney by election race? She says she was just supporting a friend but party hacks aren't happy.

Andrew Crook — Former <em>Crikey</em> Senior Journalist

Andrew Crook

Former Crikey Senior Journalist

A spat has broken out inside the NSW Greens after Senator Sarah Hanson-Young endorsed a rival candidate for the imminent byelection for the lower house seat of Sydney. Last night, Hanson-Young took to Twitter to endorse gay marriage lobbyist Alex Greenwich as Clover Moore's successor for the prestigious bearpit possie.

Problematically, the Greens have already formally endorsed a candidate, former Sydney City councillor Chris Harris, who decided not to contest the recent council poll to focus on the byelection triggered by Barry O'Farrell's "Get Clover" laws. Harris is close to Greens NSW Senator Lee Rhiannon's so-called "eastern bloc" faction, which is rarely on friendly terms with Hanson-Young. On the Greens' Sydney electoral campaign committee mailing list late this morning, De Brierley Newton -- who replaced Harris on the council ticket but failed to get elected after the Greens' vote slumped -- leapt into print to ask how Hanson-Young could be "this stupid or this calculated". "Perhaps a call to her office explaining that if Sydney goes pear-shaped it will impact on the Federal election result for The Greens and our lead Senate candidate. Might help," she said.
From: De Brierley Newton Subject: Re: [SydECC] Sarah Hanson Young endorses Alex Greenwich Date: 21 September 2012 11:54:52 AM AEST To: Matt Robertson, Greens Federal election Campaign committee

Hi Matt

Free Trial

You've hit members-only content.

Sign up for a FREE 21-day trial to keep reading and get the best of Crikey straight to your inbox

By starting a free trial, you agree to accept Crikey’s terms and conditions


Leave a comment

18 thoughts on “Greens crack-up in Sydney as SHY backs rival candidate

  1. Mike Smith

    Its out there, any damage that can be done, has been, have you never heard of caching? Don’t try and cover things up, that looks really bad.

  2. Honest Johnny

    I think Sarah’s enthusiam for her good friend may have caused her to overlook the senstivities in the NSW Greens since the tough recent local Government elections. There are many good “community advocate” so-called ‘independents’ across the state, but they do tend to soak up a large chunk of the Green vote, and also take the Greens for granted. Also, I’m not sure what the situation is like in SA where SHY hails from, but where there has been a popular ‘independent’ local member or candidate, such as Sydney or Manly, the Green vote has tended to underperform compared to neighbouring areas. That’s why, regardless of the personal friendships involved, a prominent Green, such as a Senator, should never publicly endorse an ‘independent’ candidate where a Green candidate is also standing.

  3. klewso

    So she’s a real “politician”?
    That cheap stunt of taking her baby into the house (because she could, because she’s a politician) was enough for me.
    There’s a little bit too much nitroglycerine about her.

  4. Karletta Abianac

    Oh please, nothing wrong in my eyes in saying something nice to a fellow politician. I’d rather that than the petty bagging-out that usually goes on.

  5. John Newton

    I would have thought that Senator Hanson-Young might have checked the local political landscape before leaping in with an endorsement

  6. Frank Campbell

    Neither faction of the Greens seem much interested in the environment. This reflects their class and regional limitations. Climate millenarianism is no subsititute for environmentalism- in fact subverts it. And the pressing concerns of extremely low postcodes differ markedly from those beyond the GPOs.

    I’ve been saying constantly for three years on this site that the Greens are doomed to remain stuck where they are on 10% or so- at best. Remember it’s not so long since (a) progressives were sure the Libs were about to split into impotence, followed a year later by (b) certainty that the degenerate ALP would be replaced by the Greens as the only party with the moral coherence to oppose the hard Right.

    And now? The Greens were abruptly abandoned by their talismanic leader. Brown looked old and tired. I think he knew he’d blown it. History won’t be kind to Bob: the leader who fell for climate catastrophism, seeing it as the short-cut to green Nirvana. The genuine environmental hero who led his devoted flock into the wilderness and left them to be slaughtered. They know the game is up, and (leaderless) they’re turning on each other.

  7. klewso

    “Two of three little pigs”, ideas above their station – too many not prepared to build, they want to “move in now”.

    Until they change that fringe mentality mind-set they’ll remain a boutique/niche market on “≤15%” – but that’s still 1:6-9 of us that vote for them. If we had a more proportionally representative voting system we’d have more of them in our federal house of legislation, instead of just in the more reflective Senate.

  8. Steve777

    Frank – a 68 year old man retired after 30 years in various leadership positions in the Green movement, 16 years in the Senate and 7 as Federal Greens leader. He retired mid term to give a new leader time to settle in and get the team ready for the next election. That is not ‘abandoning’ the Greens. And it was certainly not because he decided that he was wrong on Climate Change.

  9. Frank Campbell

    I agree, Steve777, Brown is still a Believer, years away from recanting climate catastrophism. Eventually he will, like James Lovelock (who has been airbrushed from existence on Crikey and similar sites since March this year).

    But Brown did finally comprehend the political cul-de-sac into which he led the Greens. Perhaps he briefly believed his own bluster about the Greens eventually replacing the ALP, but that seemed to me to be mere political piety. (Followers less astute than Brown had visions of a rapid apotheosis of the Greens). The failure of the Greens in Higgins and Bradfield- after much hubristic chestthumping- was probably the turning point.

    As for giving the new leader time to consolidate, this begs the question of why an unchallenged icon like Brown, who knew full well that the Greens were beset with competing ambitions and factions, would depart before a crucial election which could come at any time. He must have known Milne could not match his popularity, and that at best the Greens would take a hit at the next election. In effect, Brown has admitted that extra-parliamentary environmental activism is better than a fruitless slog in Canberra. As I said, Bob looked old and tired when he checked out, and now is tanned and revivified.

  10. Mike Smith

    @Frank: apotheosis? Apoptosis is, I fear, more likely, given this article.

Share this article with a friend

Just fill out the fields below and we'll send your friend a link to this article along with a message from you.

Your details

Your friend's details