Aug 28, 2012

Lach, stock and both barrels: who’s killing Channel Ten?

Five years ago, the Ten Network -- thanks to its focus on the advertiser-friendly young demographic -- was the country's most profitable network. Now it's the least profitable. So what happened?

Matthew Knott

Former Crikey media reporter

The champagne was flowing, Sydney Harbour was sparkling and Lachlan Murdoch was full of optimism.

“To be brutally honest, a couple of years ago Ten had lost its mojo,” Murdoch, the Ten Network’s then CEO, told the crowd at the station’s glittering programming launch last August. “But we have rediscovered it, we have reinvested in it and we have re-energised it … Ten is back.”

Free Trial

Proudly annoying those in power since 2000.

Sign up for a FREE 21-day trial to keep reading and get the best of Crikey straight to your inbox

By starting a free trial, you agree to accept Crikey’s terms and conditions


Leave a comment

19 thoughts on “Lach, stock and both barrels: who’s killing Channel Ten?

  1. Johnny1P5

    Time TEN took a bit of chance and did something for 2 months plus (keep at it in other words), PG shows like Merlin, Psych, Monk, Eureka and White Collar, put them in at 7:30pm for an alternative, Once Upon A Time worked for Seven (even pulling 900,000 when on 3 times a week up against the Olympics and better against The Voice).

    Sure some of those may be repeats, however White Collar is almost 2 seasons behind and Psych was running on ONE and pulled after 2 episodes of Season 5 (they’re up to Season 7 in the US), give prime-time PG drama a try. Like when I was growing up and we got the A-Team, Incredible Hulk, Hawaii Five-O (Jack Lord one), McGyver and etc at 7:30pm, TEN would do well to find those PG type shows to put on (in my humble opinion).

    Note: White Collar is a PG rated show in the US, not sure if it is here with our classifications as Chuck was rated PG in the US as well and Nine had to show it as an M rated show, however I think the shift has come and people are looking for more now (why Once Upon A Time did well).

  2. klewso

    No mention of their nailing their political colours to their mast, in the form of their “Blot on the Political Landscape”?

  3. Matt

    “He’s a bad decision maker in a job where you need to make solid decisions,” said another. What job requires bad decisions, one wonders?

    Seriously though, this is about TEN having abandoned their traditional form to become a kind of ABC for bogans.

  4. Post thick graduand

    Now that both Nine and Seven have grabbed their big football competitions (the two most popular sports in the land), is TEN in desperate need of something similar?

  5. Ian

    The reasons I don’t watch ten all that much….three words;

    Murdoch, Rinehart, Bolt.

  6. James K

    Ian – spot on. I stopped watching 10 when Andrew B_lt was given a regular show. I rang them and told them that too: any station that can put a big_t like him on does not deserve any suppport.

    The only glimmer of relevance might be the hour long news with the young faces commentating and reading. But even that is often polluted by liberal stooges there to “keep it conservative”. I am sad to see those young guns sell out to it really.

    10 has lost the plot, and are paying for it. But things do change. Channel 7 use to be useless and now it seems to nab a lot of the more watched shows.

  7. zut alors

    Lachlan has certainly made his impression on the Ten Network. But at least he’s not as big a git as his brother. Faint praise.

  8. JacetheAce

    Warburton is a salesman, not a creative and no amount of wishing himself to be one will get him there if he doesn’t have the talent for it; and by the looks of Ten’s schedule he certainly doesn’t. As for Murdoch, well, let’s just say someone got lucky in the gene pool stakes. Money only gets you so far in life if you don’t have the smarts to back it up. But, at least Ten isn’t One Tel (at least, not yet). Murdoch’s ‘attention to detail’ has been noted in various other roles he has performed when he was with News Ltd/Corp.

    I presume Mott was disposed of because Ten wants to grab Adam Boland who created Sunrise; although it seems the spike of interest in breakfast television has past. It’s the only thing that can explain the continued presence of Ten’s breakfast show, which is probably outrated by the Russian news on SBS. Mott was, by and large, a good programmer; it’s only in the last two years that the output has really stunk up the joint. Ten is streets ahead of Nine and Seven in the drama department, with Nine relying on the interminable Underbelly and Seven on its cheapo Rafter/Blue Heeler/All Saints rubbish for years. Now that Nine has had success with Howzat, expect a raft of mini-series based on cultural icons of the 70s. Up next, the warts and all of Hey, Hey It’s Saturday. At least Ten has given us Offspring from John Edwards (who was also responsible for FOXTEL’s Love My Way).

    Ten is seriously in danger of falling behind even SBS on some nights. For that, the entire management team needs to be replaced, because that is simply unacceptable on any level.

  9. Owen Gary

    Was it ever alive?

    Cant say I ever noticed.


    Shock horror what on earth is going on at TEN!
    The question should really be why does TEN treat there potential audience like a pack masochistic coach potatoes who compliantly sit in front of of there telly’s and soak up the garbage fed to them by the TEN network…the shire.. Being Lora somebody.. reruns of sit coms..and the list goes on.Wake up TEN and start by dumping the crap you cosign to good entertainment and stop treating your potential audience like intelligent human beings and not morons.

Share this article with a friend

Just fill out the fields below and we'll send your friend a link to this article along with a message from you.

Your details

Your friend's details