At the same time as many Australian households live in dwellings larger than they need, others can’t find affordable homes big enough to cope with family life.

The average number of bedrooms in our homes has increased over the past 15-20 years, yet average household size has declined. Older Australians in particular are spoilt for space — 84% live in homes with one or more spare bedrooms.

The problem with this mismatch is it makes it harder for some households to find affordable, appropriately sized housing in locations they prefer. Some may travel longer distances to work than they otherwise would. Some, like “empty-nesters”, who already occupy dwellings larger than they want are deterred from down-sizing.

A key reason is the high level of stamp duty levied on home purchases by state governments. In Victoria, for example, a dwelling that costs the median price (circa $530,000) incurs a stamp duty liability of $23,770.

Stamp duty scale for purchase of principal place of residence (Victoria)

That’s equivalent to 4.5% of the purchase price. For households who have the option of staying put, that’s a very large disincentive to moving to a dwelling that’s a better fit. It limits the ability of property markets to sort households into appropriately sized and located dwellings.

new study undertaken by the Spatial Economics Research Centre at LSE throws light on just how large that impediment can be. The researchers, Christian Hilber and Teemu Lyytikäinen, find that higher stamp duty on dwelling purchase negatively affects a household’s propensity to move.

The scale of the effect is astonishing. Their headline finding is a “2 percentage-point increase in the stamp duty may reduce mobility of home owners by around 40%”. Hilber and Lyytikäinen exploit a “discontinuity” in the UK tax schedule where the duty payable jumps particularly sharply, from 1% to 3%:

“This discontinuity allows us to isolate the impact of the stamp duty from other determinants of mobility. Specifically, we compare households with self-assessed house values on either side of the cut-off, while controlling for flexible but smooth functions of house values.”

They find stamp duty in the UK has “very substantial detrimental effects on the functioning of the housing market”. However its impact is largely confined to short distance moves (less than 10 kilometres).

Peter Fray

Fetch your first 12 weeks for $12

Here at Crikey, we saw a mighty surge in subscribers throughout 2020. Your support has been nothing short of amazing — we couldn’t have got through this year like no other without you, our readers.

If you haven’t joined us yet, fetch your first 12 weeks for $12 and start 2021 with the journalism you need to navigate whatever lies ahead.

Peter Fray
Editor-in-chief of Crikey

JOIN NOW