Jul 9, 2012

IEA says renewable energy set to boom

The IEA says renewable energy deployment to accelerate despite economic downturn. And it notes solar PV is increasingly competitive, even for miners. Giles Parkinson of RenewEconomy reports.

The International Energy Agency has delivered a bullish outlook for renewable technologies, saying its deployment would accelerate even beyond the rapid growth of recent years — despite the winding back of incentives and subsidies in some countries.

IEA executive director Maria van der Hoeven said more than 710GW of renewable energy capacity is expected to be installed in the next five years, a 45% jump over the previous five years. But it is still well short of what is needed to meet emission abatement and climate change targets.

Free Trial

Proudly annoying those in power since 2000.

Sign up for a FREE 21-day trial to keep reading and get the best of Crikey straight to your inbox

By starting a free trial, you agree to accept Crikey’s terms and conditions


Leave a comment

29 thoughts on “IEA says renewable energy set to boom

  1. Hamis Hill

    Perhaps renewables facilitate economic expansion outside the present constraints of the grid.
    This might follow the effect of Henry Ford’s affordable car which delivered North Americans out of their overpriced, central city slum accommodation and into the American Dream of sustainable suburbia. In that free market, unlike Australia, farmers set the lowest land prices by competing with each other to simply put pegs into the ground for their car -delivered new customers. No water, sewer or electricity grids and only rudimentary roads. With former high rents freed up for investment in purchasing the products of mass production, and by expanding Ford’s “Five Dollar Day” method of creating a market for his goods.
    (Adam Smith’s “returning capital” which describes how manufacturers’ wages costs are returned when the goods are sold, which is were the manufacturing nations’ trade surpluses at the expense of US consumers comes from).
    To reiterate; renewables may be enabling technologies which liberate spending from a high cost sector like the grid with its expensive, monopoly-like housing options and services.
    Just a thought which focusses on unaffordable housing as the major economic problem today and
    renewables as a liberating solution. Pity the Liberals aren’t interested in anything besides “conserving” the status quo.

  2. Mark Duffett

    Note in all the, ahem, sunny figures and forecasts about renewables deployment, not one word about how emissions have or will reduce as a result. Rather, despite Europe being “a key centre for renewable deployment”, and “the deep economic crisis and negative growth”, it has just burned its most coal since 2006 (businessweek.com/news/2012-07-02/europe-burns-coal-fastest-since-2006-in-boost-for-u-dot-s-dot-energy)

    Join the dots – renewables, by themselves, will not do the job required.

  3. Andybob

    My daughter is in Germany for the year and says there are solar panels everywhere. When people ask her about solar energy in Australia, she feels slightly embarrassed.

  4. Hamis Hill

    One supposes that the Japanese Daibatsu, who have read Adam Smith, will be manufacturing their own renewables and keeping the wages in the country.
    This tends to marginalise deabate about price because the increased employment facilitates the market.
    As with Japanese Cars, a large domestic economy creates the economies of scale and profits are enhanced by exports.
    We are talking about markets are we not? “OECD countries had locked in fossil fuel dominated grids”.
    Australia should regard itself as a developing country and just get on with regional development.
    It is a bloody “Continent” after all. Not a clutch of capital city mortgage slaves who are kept in captivity lest the banking sector fail. Renewables! you have noyhing to lose but your chains!

  5. Frank Campbell

    Andybob: your daughter should not be even slightly embarrassed.

    The German craze for solar is a case study in self-defeating absurdity: $130 billion to cover the cost of PV installed between 2000-2011 (over 20 years), and $370 billion after the recent changes in the EEG, up to 2030.

    And all for what (so far)? barely 3% of total power production. And it’s unreliable power of course. Not a single nuclear or FF power station can be retired- leading to expensive redundancy.

    Here’s some detail from DS:

    “Der Speigel” 12 april 2012:

    “Solar subsidies cost German consumers billions of dollars a year and are widely regarded as inefficient. Even environmentalists are concerned that Berlin’s focus on solar comes at the detriment of other renewables. But the solar industry has a powerful lobby, and politicians have proven powerless to resist.
    Next year, a three-person family will likely have to pay up to an additional €175 ($220) to finance the construction of renewable energy infrastructure…. Erdmann has calculated the effects that the latest changes to the EEG will have between now and 2030. He believes that subsidies for renewable energy, including an expansion of the power grid, will saddle energy consumers with costs well over €300 billion ($377 billion).

    Photovoltaics are threatening to become the costliest mistake in the history of German energy policy. Photovoltaic power plant operators and homeowners with solar panels on their rooftops are expected to pocket around €9 billion ($11.3 billion) this year, yet they contribute barely 4 percent of the country’s power supply, and only erratically at that…
    the German Physical Society writes in an expert opinion, stating, “Photovoltaics are fundamentally incapable of replacing any other type of power plant.” Essentially, every solar array must be backed up with a conventional power plant as a reserve, creating an expensive double infrastructure…
    To save one ton of CO2, Weimann explains, we could either spend €5 on insulating an old building, €20 as investment in a new gas-fired power plant, or around €500 on photovoltaic arrays.”

  6. Lord Barry Bonkton

    Lucky i jumped in with solar panels before CanLie axed the solar price paid to solar power generators (44 c + 6 c (Origin ) ) to 8 cents a kw and then sell it to my neighbor for 22+ cents + GST. That’s theft ! It goes on your Inverter size and not the panels fitted , so i can still add on 6 x 190watt panels to make 3 kw. 3.5 yrs to pay off and then its free power to add to my free Solar hot water (15+ yrs old )Long term with 3kw system, will get a small cheque every quarter and one less monkey on my back . Water runs past my house , so cannot get out of paying for water CONnection Fees ? The COALalition must get Coal donations and shares?

  7. T.Williams

    Nice takedown here of Frank Campbell’s “Der Spiegel” reference. Try quoting figures from an unbiased source next time, Frank.
    Meanwhile, the UK forges ahead registering a 1st quarter record for renewable generation of 11% . Stupid stupid Australia.

  8. GeeWizz

    Lord Bonkers,

    The price of electricity takes many things into account not just energy production. Maintanence of power poles and power lines, administration costs, building NEW power connections, building NEW power plants, etc etc etc.

    Therefore your power isn’t worth 22 cents.

    BTW CanDo is doing what all other states are doing and thats dropping huge solar subsidies. There are three main reasons for this.

    1. The high costs of solar FIT’s are pushing up the price of other things to fund them, including power prices.

    2. Gillards Miracle Carbon Tax is meant to solve all the worlds global warming problems, so why should the QLD government pay for solar panels? Abbotts direct action plan would actually fund programs such as solar but the lefties told us we needed a great big tax

    3. Solar Panels have become so cheap that the FIT means that panel installs are now paid off within 3 years, versus about 10 years only a few years ago.

    CanDo is doing what he can to repair QLD’s finances after the usual spendathon by incompetent Labor governments.

  9. jeebus

    @Frank, expensive and inefficient? Actually, German solar has saved consumers (especially those who have never even invested in solar panels themselves), many a Euro off their electricity bills.

    “Afternoon peaks used to be when German utilities could charge more for electricity supplied to the grid. But solar has changed all that – by having the lowest marginal costs (zero) at a time that coincides with its peak production.

    The result is that solar has lowered the peak prices of electricity to lower than off-peak prices in the dead of night.
    Deutsche Bank solar analyst Vishal Shah noted in a report last Friday that German utilities are being significantly impacted due to excess solar generation – a result of the merit order impact. This is true not just of the German market, but Italy as well, which actually exceeded Germany last year for the amount of solar PV installed in 2011.”

    So there you have it. Solar power provides the energy equivalent of liquidity to the power market during critical peak times, which leads to a much more efficient, and much more competitive energy market.

    This benefits consumers who do not own solar panels just as much as those who do.

  10. Hamis Hill

    “IEA Says Renewable Energy Set To Boom”, but reading the above posts you’d get the impression that Photo Voltaics is the only renewable energy source.
    Or that the mature sector of mechanical batteries will have no impact on the intermittent supply of some renewables.
    The call from other posters to broaden the debate is routinely ignored.
    PV is expensive but reliable and will always need back up by batteries, generators or the Grid.
    We all know this, move on!

Share this article with a friend

Just fill out the fields below and we'll send your friend a link to this article along with a message from you.

Your details

Your friend's details