Jun 27, 2012

Ashby is no Grech moment…unless you’re Mal Brough

The Ashby saga is unlikely to do much damage to the opposition but it will do plenty to Mal Brough, once touted as a future leader.

Bernard Keane — Politics editor

Bernard Keane

Politics editor

In the wilder fantasies of some government members at the moment, the James Ashby story will eventually explode and inflict massive damage on the Coalition and Tony Abbott, as if, having failed to land a blow on Tony Abbott for two-and-a-half years, Labor can relax and watch him be destroyed by his own handiwork. Comparisons to Godwin Grech and, with a considerable stretch from Anthony Albanese, Watergate, have been invoked. Albanese continued to try to draw Abbott into the saga this morning, calling a media conference at Parliament House to demand the opposition leader reveal every last detail of the Coalition's contact with Ashby. The clumsy handling of the matter by a number of senior Coalition figures over how many had met with Ashby -- particularly Christopher Pyne, whose normally sharp memory seems to have started playing tricks on him in relation to his dealings with Ashby -- gives a patina of credibility to Albanese's "who knew what and when" demands. But alas for Labor, the Ashby saga has little in common with Godwin Grech. Abbott has been quick to accuse the government of sleaze over Craig Thomson and Slipper, but he hasn't made dramatic claims of prime ministerial corruption based on the word of one mentally fragile individual, like his predecessor did. Indeed, Abbott has preferred to let others, like Pyne, carry much of the attack on the government, a lesson he presumably acquired from watching Malcolm Turnbull lead with his chin on "Utegate". While it won't have much impact on Abbott's political future, it's already done a pretty fair job of wrecking Mal Brough's return to politics. Twice now Brough has been revealed as having misled the public over his role in the affair. The first time was in early May when, in the aftermath of Fairfax's Jessica Wright outing him as having met with Ashby, he arranged a tell-all explanation to The Australian, complete with photo shoot with his wife, to explain he'd met with Ashby three times and had only spoken to a small number of trusted legal advisers about the matter, and not anyone else in the Coalition or LNP. That marked a change from his position of just a few days earlier, that claims he was aware of the legal action beforehand were "nonsense". We now know, courtesy of yesterday's document release by the Federal Court, that he was misleading the public again with his claims to The Oz, and was a key player in the co-ordination of what appears to have been a campaign to damage Slipper, trying to arrange a job within the LNP for another disaffected Slipper staffer, Karen Doane. Ashby is also alleged to have emailed Brough with confidential material from Slipper's diary. What's bizarre about Brough's involvement is that it was wholly unnecessary. Brough has -- or had -- a lock on preselection for Fisher. He was guaranteed to re-enter federal politics at the next election. But the route of a man once touted as leadership material since he lost Longman in 2007 has been a circuitous one. He led Liberal moderate resistance to the establishment of the LNP by the Queensland Nationals (who were aided by Queensland Liberal conservatives led by Santo Santoro, who ironically now finds himself a target of the man who bankrolled the merger, Clive Palmer). He thus became the highest profile casualty of the merger -- Lawrence Springborg mockingly demanded to know "where's Mal" when the merger was approved. Brough moved to Melbourne to lick his wounds but managed to overcome his anger and join the party he swore he'd never go near in 2010, targeting Slipper's seat (perhaps to the point of obsession) and rebuilding relations with at least some of the LNP hierarchy. Now he's put all of that in danger with a remarkable display of poor judgment in not merely becoming involved in a campaign to damage Slipper -- who could always be relied upon to damage himself, regardless of who else was trying -- but then lying about it publicly. Even if he returns to politics, he's damaged goods, and the former minister may find his stint on the backbench an extended one under a Coalition government. The Liberals have had a fair infusion of talent since Brough was last in Parliament, and most of the people in the queue ahead of him have been smart enough to keep away from the sort of thing Brough now finds himself embroiled in.

Free Trial

You've hit members-only content.

Sign up for a FREE 21-day trial to keep reading and get the best of Crikey straight to your inbox

By starting a free trial, you agree to accept Crikey’s terms and conditions


Leave a comment

32 thoughts on “Ashby is no Grech moment…unless you’re Mal Brough

  1. bluepoppy

    There are different issues here:

    1st: Is Slipper guilty of any of the charges laid at his feet. Only a Court can decide.

    2nd: Was LNP guilty of conspiring against Slipper because a) Slipper was known to be dodgy anyway and thus an easy mark for revenge or b) Slipper is innocent of all charges but the LNP knowing the taint of suspicion is often enough for an outcome.

    3rd: Is Ashby guilty of concocting false charges against Slipper? Only a Court can decide.

    The rest is purely guesswork, but the LNP has done a good job of getting their hands dirty in this whole affair.

    The worst Opposition Australia has even seen for many reasons including the Slipper affair.

  2. geomac62

    You never get anything that shows the libnats in a poor light so whats new ? Brough has not been very bright and was caught out thats plain and simple . Pyne of the formerly sharp brain retention forgets like a Downer and then remembers when evidence crops up . If texts are to be telling in this case I would think that the texts Ashby sent Slipper show that crude language and expressions are the norm for the staffer . On standards alone if not deceit and working against his boss while claiming loyal allegiance he doesn,t deserve his job . The tone of those texts by Ashby refutes any fear about his boss as the reason not to go through proper channels . The media set up and bringing the case against Slipper while he is abroad are further evidence of a set up . You wont get it but the court will and I imagine a lot of voters as well .

  3. Paul

    The query in the article as to why Brough did what he did and said is actually explained later.
    He was trying to get 2 sleaze bags a job for shafting Slipper, what was in it for him takes little imagination.
    The government have been right onto this from the start and now they are questioning Abbott, they clearly know something. I hope he and Pyne have to go to court and answer questions under oath, we will see both have a total memory loss, on some matters, for a brief period.
    Of course they may tell the truth and if so I am really looking forward to seeing pigs fly.
    On another note I read a Gratton article that actually criticised Abbott, wow, next the ABC will become balanced.

  4. GeeWizz

    Geomac incorrect.

    I have actually stated here for a long time that the Slipper affair may well indeed be a Coalition setup to rope-a-dope.

    See the coalition know Slipper a lot better than you or me and there are rumours that he has a habit for this sort of behaviour…. so what do you do? Parachute in some good looking young man who is a member of the Liberal Party then sit back and let Peter Slipper do his “thing” and record all of it.

    The problem for the Labor Party is that EVEN IF they can prove what I am saying is true…. even if this was all just a massive setup by the Liberal Party… only Peter Slipper himself is responsible for actions he took. Sure he may well have been baited… but he took it hook, line and sinker when he needed have to.

    And thats why he will never be speaker again.

  5. Gavin Moodie

    I’m surprised that no one has commented on the involvement in this mess of the Australian’s journalist Steve Lewis. He seems to have been closely involved in trying to ‘get’ Slipper, not just report Ashby’s complaint.

  6. Lord Barry Bonkton

    Gavin , that’s why it was called ” UTEGATE 2 ” same reporter and same dodgy LNP party. The only reason MSM have woke up , because Slipper has put the texts in the court.

  7. klewso

    Does Lewis work from the office of the Coalition Leader – with all those “scoops” of his?

  8. eric

    Because a fair amount of voters dont like phoney Tony very much they will take this affair as another sign the he is not fit to be PM of the nation.
    It would be great to see one of the worst mudslingers of all times get hooked on this one.

    BTW wheres Suzie???

  9. Mack the Knife

    The head of the octopus is the H R Nicholls Society that Costello set up.

    On the face of it it appears that elements of Fair Work Australia connected to Kathy Jackson and a growing list of others will be found to be the tentacles that will lead to the head of the Octopus who are, anyway funding Ashby and Jackson for free.

    They seem to find out everything these days about secret links and hidden stuff.

    This may yet turnout larger than the Utegate affair, Bernard

  10. Michael de Angelos

    Aussies basically don’t care about a person’s sexuality and despite Mr Slipper’s Wildean approaches to said staffer, they abhor a honey trapper and sympathy will be falling Slipper’s way.

    I can tell you know-Sydney eastern Suburb’s types, who naturally support Malcolm Turnbull cannot believe what a bungle this is and sheeting blame home to Abbott.

    We may well see in late 2013 Turnbull and Rudd go head to head in a GE.

    I’ve always said : it is not in Tony Abbott’s destiny to be PM and I’ve studied chook entrails on this and never been wrong yet,

Leave a comment

Share this article with a friend

Just fill out the fields below and we'll send your friend a link to this article along with a message from you.

Your details

Your friend's details