Australia

May 29, 2012

Electoral Commission on a roll as hunt on for the unenrolled

The Australian Electoral Commission today launches "Count Me In." As it describes it: "a nationwide hunt for voters missing from the electoral roll."

Charles Richardson — Editor of The World is not Enough

Charles Richardson

Editor of The World is not Enough

The Australian Electoral Commission today launches “Count Me In”: as it describes it, “a nationwide hunt for voters missing from the electoral roll.” Commissioner Ed Killesteyn expresses concern that “the estimated number of missing voters is serious and comparable to a city the size of Perth or most of Brisbane disappearing off the map”.

But wait before getting out your dart gun; it’s the commission itself that will be doing the hunting, and that by relatively non-invasive means. There will be “a postcard to every Australian household”, outlining “the three easy steps to enrol or update enrolment details”, plus “A national online advertising campaign, stencil art on the pavements of capital cities, and community radio advertising”.

Free Trial

Proudly annoying those in power since 2000.

Sign up for a FREE 21-day trial to keep reading and get the best of Crikey straight to your inbox

By starting a free trial, you agree to accept Crikey’s terms and conditions

24 comments

Leave a comment

24 thoughts on “Electoral Commission on a roll as hunt on for the unenrolled

  1. Gavin Moodie

    I agree. If voting is compulsory it should be implemented as conveniently as possible. Keane’s counter argument leads to the erosion of trust in the legal system: we have a law on the books but wont try seriously to enforce it.

  2. garydj

    Thanks, Charles, for another excellent article.

  3. Bo Gainsbourg

    OK I kind of liked this article, but the bit about compulsory rolling up and registering on voting day as an infringement of civil liberties is a bit….meh. I can think of a pile of stuff higher on that list than that tiny inconvenience. Just has a Libertarian flavour about it that possibly passes muster in a 1st year philosophy/politics class but really…its a bit of a yawn as an issue. Do you really feel your civil rights are grossly violated by that absolutely minor requirement? Its not as if anyone wanting to lodge a ‘they can all get stuffed’ great moral protest is somehow stopped from doing it, fact is, when the vast majority of people are gently invited to participate in at least one aspect of the democratic process, they are fine with it. But I’m sure Eric Abetz would lend you a sympathetic ear if its really that bad.

  4. Liz45

    I heard someone today suggest, that the AEC do an ‘opt out’ formula? All people to be automatically put on the AEC list at 18, and then it’s up to people to have their name removed? Then they’d have to give a reason. AEC just go by the info Govts already have re family payments etc.

  5. Andrew

    It’s helpful that you have distinguished two issues that so often are mixed together – automatic enrolment and compulsory voting. The AEC is actually doing people a favour with automatic enrolment – they can be enrolled without bothering to have to fill out a form when they turn 18, move house etc. I’m sure the AEC have better uses for taxpayer money than sending out enrolment forms all day, or sending out those roll update people who knock on your door a few months before elections. This initiative would ensure that anyone who wants to vote can vote regardless of when the election is called, stop the avalanche of enrolments when an election is called and stop the ridiculous Labour/Coalition to and fro about the close of rolls date.

  6. Jillian Blackall

    I think it’s a concern that there are so many people out there who either don’t care or think that they can’t make a difference. Introducing automatic enrolment does not resolve that underlying problem.

  7. drsmithy

    As it happens, I agree with Keane about the obnoxiousness of compulsory voting (or, for pedants, compulsory showing-up-to-a-polling-place-and-getting-your-name-crossed-off — why anyone thinks this distinction matters is completely beyond me).

    Because one thing forces you to influence an outcome you may not agree with and the other does not.

    That’s the debate that we should be having. If compulsory voting is bad, let’s argue against it directly rather than rely on people being able to evade it by subterfuge.

    Compulsory voting isn’t bad. It’s one of, if not the, best features of our democratic system.

    I find it strange that someone would, on the one hand, complain about imaginary disenfranchisement of voters, yet on the other argue for a system that must – by the same logic – create even more.

  8. drsmithy

    OK I kind of liked this article, but the bit about compulsory rolling up and registering on voting day as an infringement of civil liberties is a bit….meh. I can think of a pile of stuff higher on that list than that tiny inconvenience.

    Indeed. One can barely conceive the sort of oppression jury duty, K-12 schooling and immunisation represent to Messrs Richardson and Keane.

    Imagine if they had to live in one of those totalitarian states like Switzerland where you have to register with the local authorities whenever you move house !

  9. Meski

    @DrSmithy: Choosing not to choose is a choice in itself. 🙂

  10. drsmithy

    Choosing not to choose is a choice in itself.

    No aspect of our compulsory voting system prevents you from choosing not to cast a valid vote.

    I have yet to see anyone complaining about compulsory voting being an infringement of their rights have the intellectual integrity to attack the vastly greater imposts of jury duty and 12 years of compulsory schooling – to name but two other responsibilities of living in modern society – so enthusiastically.

Share this article with a friend

Just fill out the fields below and we'll send your friend a link to this article along with a message from you.

Your details

Your friend's details

Sending...