May 10, 2012

‘You overpaid, overeducated parasite’: ANU climate scientist emails

Abusive emails and accounts of threatening behaviour towards climate research staff have been released by ANU following an FOI request. Graham Readfearn reveals what they say.

Abusive emails and accounts of threatening behaviour towards climate research staff have been released by the Australian National University, following a Freedom of Information request.

The Canberra-based university has decided not to appeal against a Privacy Commissioner’s finding that 11 documents unearthed through a FOI request should be released.

Free Trial

Proudly annoying those in power since 2000.

Sign up for a FREE 21-day trial to keep reading and get the best of Crikey straight to your inbox

By starting a free trial, you agree to accept Crikey’s terms and conditions


Leave a comment

44 thoughts on “‘You overpaid, overeducated parasite’: ANU climate scientist emails

  1. Edward James

    Interesting Crikey. As you and your readers know. I have published on this site a link to my published allegations identifying politicians who have shown no interest in the NSW coroner being misled by my local council. Not one of your people at Crikey have contacted me to question my often published position and often published links to allegations our elected reps accommodate systemic corruption. Edward James Central Coast NSW 0243419140 near where Craig Thomson resides {:-)

  2. Sancho

    Organisations like the IPA and Heartland Institute pitch their arguments directly at people who regard “overeducated” as a term of abuse.

  3. ochre1954

    Your wasting your time Edward. This site is not interested in a balanced argument or outlook. In my opinion it is nothing more than the propaganda journal of the Labor/Greens Coalition.
    I do believe that there is climate change, however when the head of the commission has been proven to have been misleading and telling downright lies, who do we “ordinary” Australians believe.
    I have a degree in business not in climate science and neither does Tim Flannery.
    So who do we believe.
    The emails have proven to have not been as abusive and threatening as reported in the media and the alleged death threats; come on. It made for good news.
    Again when distortions like this occur how can you believe the climate scientist and the Climate Commission.

  4. bluepoppy

    What is it about climate change that brings out the rage. There are certainly many more issues one can think of that might rate this angst such as lies about WMDs, corruption, peodphiles, sexual abuse, children in detention, persecution of organisations like Wikileaks, Bradley Manning, but climate change seems to have a much more heightened and polarising effect.

    Whether one agrees or not with a carbon tax or the causes of climate change, the tax will have negligible effect, certainly no more than any other tax like the GST. Also you can just change your habits and use less of whatever it is that incurs the tax.

    What is it with the mentality that thinks it is all a global conspiracy. For what purpose. I need to be enlightened.

  5. Liamj

    Given News Corps preemptive apologetics for the haters, i think ALL climate scientists who have received abusive comms should publish all of them. That would both prove the problem, give the AFP plenty to work with, and demonstrate what sort of people most of these deniers are. I read above that ANU are worried about further targeting but that is going to happen anyway; passive good manners are not the way to deal with bullies.

  6. Microseris

    1st comment, WTF? Off topic trolling?

    Can’t comprehend the arrogance of deniers, gambling our planet as they are just so sure they are right. Can I suggest if they want to gamble, only gamble with things they own and can afford to lose. Or just go to a pokies venue, I’m sure they will gratefully accept your money.

  7. davidk

    Fancy calling these ‘hard working normal folk’ ignorant.

  8. Son of foro

    Perhaps the Drum can dedicate a show to asking the IPA about these views.

  9. Stiofan

    These emails are no worse (and arguably a lot milder) than the abuse regularly hurled at anyone who disagrees with the groupthink on Crikey forums.

  10. Stiofan

    PS Anyone who is shocked by the these emails has clearly never been inside academe.

Leave a comment

Share this article with a friend

Just fill out the fields below and we'll send your friend a link to this article along with a message from you.

Your details

Your friend's details