May 3, 2012

Dog-whistle politics offends Indonesian ears

What should have been a brief exchange of pleasantries turned into a diplomatic disaster when Julie Bishop outlined the opposition’s policy on "sending back" asylum seeker boats to Indonesia.

Professor Damien Kingsbury

Crikey international affairs commentator

Not since Malcolm Fraser was prime minister has the federal Coalition understood, much less had an engaged relationship with, south-east Asia. This lack of understanding and engagement was reflected again yesterday when the opposition foreign affairs spokesperson, Julie Bishop, made a "courtesy call" on the chair and deputy chair of Indonesia’s legislature (DPR). What should have been a brief exchange of pleasantries turned into a diplomatic disaster when Bishop outlined the opposition’s policy on "sending back" asylum seeker boats to Indonesia. Indonesia’s DPR deputy chairman, Hajriyanto Tohari, described the policy as unfair on Indonesia and said that Bishop was arrogant in her expression of the policy. Bishop admitted that the discussions in Indonesia had been robust. But, in keeping with the previously expressed view of Coalition leader Tony Abbott, Bishop said she was confident a Coalition government would work well with Indonesia. That does not, however, appear to be the view in Jakarta. Australia’s policy on boat people, driven by a media panic over an unfounded sense of "invasion", has never made sense in an era of high levels of unregulated population movement, mostly by plane. It certainly makes little sense in Jakarta. As the main regional transit point for refugees, Indonesia sees the issue as distinctly regional and shared. Given most regional asylum seekers hope to come to Australia, Indonesia has long wanted to see a more humane policy on one hand and on the other a greater recognition of Indonesia carrying what it generally regards as an Australian -- not an Indonesian -- problem. Bishop’s visit only highlighted to Indonesia Australia’s denial of its ownership of the issue and the Coalition’s intention to step even further away from any sense of shared responsibility. And, by "robustly" prosecuting the Coalition’s "send them back" policy, her visit has driven a wedge between the Indonesian administration and the Coalition. Should there be a break-down in Australia’s sensitive arrangements with Indonesia on refugees, Indonesia could simply walk away from its current policy of trying to regulate the flow of people. That would open the boat-people flood-gates. In opposition, Bishop’s visit to Indonesia identifies Australia’s alternative government as, at best, diplomatically inept. Should the opposition achieve government, however, as widely indicated by a succession of public opinion polls, such ineptitude will create critical problems in the bilateral relationship and, by extension, in Australia’s regional strategic and economic engagement. International relations has always been, in large part, about playing to a domestic audience. But Bishop has just discovered that while "dog-whistle" politics might work in Australia, its shrill, isolationist call is internationally offensive.

Free Trial

Proudly annoying those in power since 2000.

Sign up for a FREE 21-day trial to keep reading and get the best of Crikey straight to your inbox

By starting a free trial, you agree to accept Crikey’s terms and conditions


Leave a comment

13 thoughts on “Dog-whistle politics offends Indonesian ears

  1. Bill Hilliger

    Unlike what would have happened if it had been labour government ineptness on refugee issues; for this one which relates directly to the coalition I bet there will be no megaphone reporting in the electronic media on the Julie Bishop arrogance in dealing with the Indonesians.

  2. robinw

    Wouldn’t it be ironic that a Coalition victory could mean that the Indonesians, pissed off by the Coalitions ineptitude, de-regulate their side of the fence thus allowing a flood of boat people to hit our shores. Good one, guys, I’m sure you planned for this all the time.

    A good spin off for us is that we could finally see the so called ‘boat people’ as genuine refugees from a situation that in some of the cases at least, we had a hand in creating in the first place. The most worrying part of all of this is that this opposition of ours could place us all in a very sticky situation thanks to their stupidity should they gain the Treasury benches. It seems that the White Australia Policy is still there with them as evidenced by this latest attempt at telling others how to run their countries.

  3. James K

    Excellent article.

    But wow: these people (Bishop and co) might just be driving the nation soon. What a disturbing thought.

  4. zut alors

    I agree with the remarks by RobinW at 2.25pm.

    The Opposition oozes its usual charm – if Indonesia thinks Bish0p was arrogant they ain’t seen nuthin’ yet. Abb0tt and Co have scarcely begun to warm up.

  5. James K

    One of the tragic ironies in all this could be a major increase in the
    number of boat arrivals after the coalition win power.

    Now what major media would stop reporting that I wonder?

  6. mattsui

    I wait for the popular response to the inevitable cheering and bluster from a coalition Government and it’s media backers when the first boat is “turned back”. One suspects that the overwhelming majority will be feeling something other than national pride.

  7. Pedantic, Balwyn

    Even sadder is that the highly professional work by our diplomats, unreported by the media, to win Indonesia’s support for curtailing the journey of mainly legitimate refugees, aboard desperately, unsafe transport, is likely to be jeopardised.
    In a country where wealth is not evenly divided, it is very challenging to arrest the flow where relatively large sums are available to profit those in the “boat people” business for greed, or even those few with more humane intentions.

    The Indonesian Government is actually quite effective, in most difficult circumstances, and crass actions by those who should know better, like Ms Bishop, do not help anyone find a resolution. In fact it demonstrates again that the Coalition is only interested in gaining power at any cost.

    However the sooner that the present Government increases the numbers of genuine refuges through recognised channels, the sooner this wholes sorry saga will end; for the benefit of both countries.

  8. Gerry Hatrick, OAP

    And so I turn on the news tonight,
    [“Coalition Boat people plans sink new low”]
    [Not here says Indonesia]
    [Get stuffed Bishop says Indonesia]

    Ohh, what a world I live in

  9. AR

    It may have been a dream but I seem to recall, almost 40yrs ago a hundred thousand refugees, indistinguishable from (if in not the same) people our troops had been fighting for almost ten years, were welcomed into Australia, by the then PM, who had been the Army Minister who’d sent our troops to that far away country. Those people became tax paying citizens.
    Fortunately, it was only a dream and i awoke to the reality of today… ah sweet Morpheus, please return all is forgiven.

  10. Lin Bowden


    You clearly did not get the memo. So, let me tell you slowly: WE will decide who comes into this country, and the methods by which they come. Any Australian political leader suspected of taking dictation to the contrary from foreigners, will be mauled by the Australian people.

    Consider the memo served. You have no excuses in future to write such ill-uninformed gutless un-Australian drivel. Where is your national self-respect FFS?

Share this article with a friend

Just fill out the fields below and we'll send your friend a link to this article along with a message from you.

Your details

Your friend's details