Menu lock


Mar 27, 2012

Why power generators are terrified of solar

In Germany, solar PV is not just licking the cream off the profits of the fossil fuel generators -- as happens in Australia with a more modest rollout of PV -- it is in fact eating their entire cake, writes Giles Parkinson, of RenewEconomy.

Here is a pair of graphs that demonstrate most vividly the merit order effect and the impact that solar is having on electricity prices in Germany; and why utilities there and elsewhere are desperate to try to rein in the growth of solar PV in Europe. It may also explain why Australian generators are fighting so hard against the extension of feed-in tariffs in this country.

The first graph illustrates what a typical day on the electricity market in Germany looked like in March four years ago; the second illustrates what is happening now, with 25GW of solar PV installed across the country. Essentially, it means that solar PV is not just licking the cream off the profits of the fossil fuel generators — as happens in Australia with a more modest rollout of PV — it is in fact eating their entire cake.

Both graphs were published last week on the website Renewables International, and were sourced from EPEX, the European power price exchange. The first graph, from 2008, shows peaking power prices rising to about €60/MWh and staying there for most of the day, with some visible peaks around noon and the early evening — the size of which would depend on the temperature and the usage.

The second graph shows a brief leap to €65/MWh around 9am, before the impact of solar PV takes hold — erasing the midday peak entirely and leaving only a smaller one in the evening. The huge bite out of day-prices is also a bite out of fossil fuel generators’ earnings and profits. Note that the average peak price in the second graph is barely higher than the baseload price.

Deutsche Bank solar analyst Vishal Shah noted in a report last month that EPEX data was showing solar PV was cutting peak electricity prices by up to 40%, a situation that utilities in Germany and elsewhere in Europe were finding intolerable. “With Germany adopting a drastic cut, we expect major utilities in other European countries to push for similar cuts as well,” Shah noted.

Analysts elsewhere said one quarter of Germany’s gas-fired capacity may be closed, because of the impact of surging solar and wind capacity. Enel, the biggest utility in Italy, which had the most solar PV installed in 2011, highlighted its exposure to reduced peaking prices when it said that a €5/MWh fall in average wholesale prices would translate into a one-third slump in earnings from the generation division.

Imagine how that graph might look in Australia with a similar deployment of solar in a country that actually has some sun. Wind has already helped reduce wholesale prices in South Australia, although it has left daytime peaks more or less untouched. Solar would have an altogether different impact.

The NSW government — which owns the state’s generators, if not their output — doesn’t want to find out, and has abolished the feed-in tariff, on the basis that it costs too much. But here’s another interesting graph.

Components of average retail bill 2011-2012

It comes from the Australian Energy Market Commission’s report on its “Power of Choice Review”, looking at range of demand management and energy-efficiency opportunities, that was released on Friday. It suggests pretty clearly that the cost of green energy incentives — the renewable energy target, feed-in tariffs, and demand management and energy efficiency schemes — in Australia is minimal. They total just 6% of the cost.

The average power bill is dominated by transmission, distribution, wholesale and retail costs. This is what the AEMC report is trying to address — what measures can be introduced that can help consumers protect themselves against rising electricity costs? — and it canvasses a whole range smart grid and smart appliance opportunities that could be introduced.

It’s not quite clear how easily that can be introduced. Most utility, generation and retail businesses are geared towards simply selling more electrons, or building more poles and wires. The AEMC report says some $11 billion of current $45 billion spend on network upgrades could possibly be avoided, but it is not yet ready to offer solutions. Notably, it says it has to try and unravel how to apportion costs and benefits among consumers, generators, retailers and network providers. IPART tried to do the same thing in its review of solar feed in tariffs and declared it to be too hard.

And just letting the forces of the market work is not necessarily an answer either. Competition in the retail market hasn’t achieved much because, as the AEMC pointed out in a previous report, “the increase in retail competition has served to increase costs” and increased retail margins are expected to contribute more to rising energy costs than green energy schemes.

While the AEMC report is at least a step in the right direction, there is a big question remaining over whether the energy industry is moving fast enough. It’s not simply a matter of changing the rules and the incentives, it is also a question of culture.Having spent decades simply delivering their product to the door using a “take it or leave it” approach (did the consumer have any choice?) the energy utilities now realise that they have to learn how to bring their business inside the household — in ways that the AEMC envisages; with smart meters, in-house displays, load controllers, storage and the like.

A study in 2010 from Ernst & Young showed how difficult a task that would be. Electricity retailers were not skilled at customer service. There was little interchange with the customers, and if there was, it was sparked by complaints around blackouts and connections.

The report noted that, with the deployment of new technologies, power and utilities companies will come under competitive attack all along the value chain, as new interactive customer relationships and new competitive models allow third parties to enter the market. The incumbents can choose either to evolve, or face a revolution where “market rationalities and business strategies change completely”.

The recent experience with feed-in tariffs suggests that the utilities will be slow to evolve. The first graphs from Germany illustrate their fears, but as David Crane from NRG pointed out last week, trying to stand in the way of this evolution could be pointless.

The arrival of solar PV, and the achievement of parity against retail prices, means that consumers do now have a choice. As Jeff Bye, the head of solar at CBD Energy told RenewEconomy last week, he is fielding dozen of calls each week from consumers asking how they can install solar and be taken off the grid.

“People are annoyed by their growing bills — even if they reduce their usage, the bills are still going up,” he says.

Bye is advising his customers to stay connected to the grid, but to use it simply as a back-up, a sort of battery of last resort. This can be done, he says, by using a 3-5kW system on the roof, battery storage and a power router — which can set excess PV power to go into the battery instead of the grid, and can source energy from the grid to top up the batteries when they get low.

“Customers are making decisions on what they are spending — 20-30c/kWh — not on what they export,” he says. On a larger scale, the City of Sydney is planning on achieving its own independence for the 300MW of capacity used within its boundaries through a network of cogeneration and tri-generation installations, backed up with distributed energy such as solar PV and battery storage.

*This article was first published at RenewEconomy

We recommend

From around the web

Powered by Taboola


Leave a comment

26 thoughts on “Why power generators are terrified of solar

  1. Jimmy

    My sister installed solar panels last year and, although there was significant issues dealing with the power company initially and they were on her roof for some months before the pwer company got all the paper work and inspections completed, her 3 monthly bill she received in Feb was $60. She lives in Eastern Surburban Melbourne, hardly the most sunny of climates.

    While I do not know the size of the unit it cost around $5k 12 -18 months ago (Ordered Oct 10 finished Mar 11).

  2. Blaggers

    “…a question of culture”

    Couldn’t agree more. Both from the utilities and the consumer.

    Kinda reminds me of the retail sector and internet sales…

  3. hooleys

    I don’t think you make much out of the two charts. The graphs only show the prices and volumes for one day of the year, and you wonder whether they are representative. (Was it especially hot or especially cloudy those two days?). Note that the volume traded in 2012 (722 GWh) is nearly double that for 2008 (445 GWh) so that the actual value in euros of energy sold is about one-third higher in 2012, with the solar panels, than it was four years ago. If anything, the data suggest that solar panels actually increase the amount of energy traded and generated, and presumably increase the income of big fossil fuel generators!

  4. Lord Barry Bonkton

    Jimmy , i have just had a 1.9kw ( 10 x 190 watt ) solar panels with a 3kw inverter fitted on my shed and got them to run power from the house to my shed as well, fire proofed the meter box, isolation switches , safety switches for the solar and shed for $3549.00 . My 3 month bill is about $170-$190 (have had solar hot water for 15 yrs ) and they say that i will wipe my bill out and may get a small amount of cash. The best way is to do your washing at night, using the cheaper power (22 cents ) and letting the solar (50 cents )pump the meter backwards at peak times. I am in sunny qld. Took about a month to get it up and running, just waiting for Energex to replace the old meter with a digital + and – meter . Then i can get paid for my excess power. Later on i can put another 6 x 190 watt on the system .

  5. John64

    Sorry, I don’t buy it. That price drop must be hurting the solar power producers as well surely? I have a sneaking suspicion that the only reason it’s so low is because the solar producers don’t care about price, they’ve got their guaranteed rebates and tariffs all paid for by the Government (which have been as high as 70c per kilowatt hour). In other words: of course the price will drop when “someone else” is paying the bill.

    @Jimmy: I’d be interested to know what the subsidies are on that system. How much of that $5k was paid for by the Government? And for your bills now, how much of that money is actually the feed-in tariff? If you take that all of that out, how much did your sister’s system really cost and how much does she really save?

    For example, a friend of mine installed his own small 1 kw system a year or so ago. The cost was about $1,000 and his first bill was pretty good. But take into account that the system /actually cost/ about $2 – $3k but was reduced thanks to the Federal Government rebate. Then there’s all the power that’s he’s “selling” back to the grid at some ridiculous price of around 40c per kilowatt hour. The only reason anyone is buying that is because of State tariffs… No electricity producer would pay 40c per kw/h for something they can produce at around 3c per kw/h from coal.

    If you actually take both of those out, what happens is his system is generating power when no-one’s home to use it (from 1 – 5 pm in the afternoon) and most of the power he uses is actually coming from the grid (IE: Coal). The only reason his bills look so good is because of the tariff. If that power wasn’t being sold at such a ridiculous rate, he wouldn’t actually be any better off. And he’d never actually pay off the initial cost of the installation before it passed its use-by date.

  6. Jimmy

    Just spoke to my sister, apparently she got a 2.5kw system for $7500 after a $5k rebate. As for how much did it really cost and how much did she really save well, it cost her $7500 and she save about $250-$300 for that quarter, the fact that the tax payer subsidised it to a degree is a different story.

    Lord BOnckton – “just waiting for Energex to replace the old meter with a digital + and – meter . Then i can get paid for my excess power. Later on i can put another 6 x 190 watt on the system .” That is where my sister ran into troubles, it took a few months, they had to send out an inspector and then he issued the notice, and then someone else had to come out and install the meter and then I think there had to be another inspection and then they wer able to go live.

  7. Filth Dimension


    Does the figure you use of 3c per kw/h factor in direct or indirect Government subsidies to coal fired electricity producers? Also, do coal fired electricity producers even have to pay $$$ for coal?

  8. outside left

    Germany, in decommissioning their nuclear power plants by 2020, which supply 20% of their power, is spending $260 BILLION dollars on solar and wind. Our conservative,and very popular state govs in Victoria, NSW, WA & now Qld want to cut back or limit the growth of renewables. Contemptible!

  9. Jimmy

    Outside Left – I find it interesting that these conservative govts who are so dead against the federal carbon price are now saying that they don’t need to spend money on climate change because of it.

    Also both Victoria and Queensland have today said that if they kept their renewable energy targets it would result in people in their states paying more than other states. I assume NSW and WA are making similar arugments which means that if every state kept their commitments they would all be paying more and therefore no one would be paying more than the other.

  10. AR

    This article, with pictures & emoticons for the terminally thick, should be printed on A3, laminated and nailed to the backbenchs in Fed & State parliaments, so that the lobby fodder dozing there will know their leaders are lying, or dumb, or both – unfortunately probably the latter.
    I’d prefer nailing it to the foreheads of the pollies but that might be thought cruel – not sure why, no brain, no pain.