Menu lock

Federal

Mar 16, 2012

Costello's claims are again thin

The bizarre dispute over the government's appointment of David Gonski, rather than Peter Costello, to the chairmanship of the Future Fund has been spun as another example of Labor incompetence.

The bizarre dispute over the government’s appointment of David Gonski, rather than Peter Costello, to the chairmanship of the Future Fund has been spun as another example of Labor incompetence.

The Rudd government appointed Costello to the board of the Future Fund — and earned considerable criticism from its backbenchers for doing so — primarily on the basis that Costello had established the Fund when treasurer. He had virtually no senior corporate experience to speak of, nor was it clear he had the high-level financial skills required to oversee the investment of $70 billion worth of taxpayers’ money.

This hasn’t stopped Costello attacking the government, of course, and nor should it, but now Costello has launched a new attack on Labor for the process of appointing Gonski. The suggestion, made explicit by Tony Abbott and others in the Coalition, is that Costello was the better man for the job. Even John Howard, who knows a thing or two about not giving Costello the top job, weighed in.

Earlier this week, the Coalition suggested Stephen Smith should resign from the Defence ministry because bureaucrats and the armed services didn’t like him. Not merely is giving our defence services a veto over ministerial appointments a bad idea, such is that state of the Defence portfolio that being resented by the troglodytes responsible for gross mismanagement, procurement stuff-ups and the waste of billions of dollars should be a prerequisite for the job.

Now the Coalition appears to think the government should have allowed some of the Future Fund board to veto the appointment of the chairman.

Like the Defence ministry, the chairmanship of the Future Fund is far too important to be left to the whims of the incumbents. The government must appoint the best people and those prepared to deal with underperformance. And as its recent record suggests, the Future Fund has been significantly underperforming under David Murray.

David Gonski is an excellent appointment. Whether he is the right man for the job remains to be seen, but one thing is certain: Costello is not even in the same league as his new chairman.

We recommend

From around the web

Powered by Taboola

19 comments

Leave a comment

19 thoughts on “Costello’s claims are again thin

  1. peter.maywald@yahoo.com

    Peter Costello’s petulant dummy spit illutrates precisely why he should not have been made chair of the Future Fund – and why he never became Prime Minister.

  2. Holden Back

    Sense of entitlement, much?

  3. Jimmy

    Strange the way this story has been spun in the MSM as the govt playing politics when it clearly appointed the best person for the job and the coal ition wanting the best person when it is clearly playuing politics.

  4. robinw

    One of the most ordinary Treasurers in Costello being praised by Malcolm Fraser’s extremely ordinary Treasurer is not the sort of reference I would want nor one that I would expect the financial markets to be too impressed with.

    I don’t know enough about Gonski but if his CV is anything to go by then he would be far better than Costello by the proverbial country mile.

    One can see that in an Abbott government the ministers would be appointed by the mandarins. Likely, I’m sure.

  5. Mark from Melbourne

    Amazing the beat up over this, my understanding of the events are:

    1. Murray informs govt of plans to retire 12 months ago
    2. FF CEO resigns at same time
    3. Gov’t (or someone) decides it would be too disruptive to have both leave at same time so Murray asked to stay another 12 months. Good business sense IMHO.
    4. FF has been serially underperforming under current board
    5. Govt hires one of the main headhunters for senior positions. Not sure who they put forward but there was an approach to Andrew Mohl who declined. Sounds like there wasnt much else going on here.
    6. Govt asks Gonski to get the board’s view who all say “internal” – go figure.
    7. Gonski says “give me some external candidates”. They give him Mohl, Alexander and Gonski!!! Once again excellent business practice – keep it arms length.
    8. Govt feels that board has been divided and that board’s majority recommendation Peter Costello does not have the experience needed to do the job. Hard to argue with the latter view – Costello really has not done much in the private/finance role outside of being Treasurer which is an entirely different gig.
    9. Govt chooses Gonski who is universally applauded as being an excellent choice
    10. Mr Grumpy shows once again why he didnt get to be PM and never should have by doing a major dummyspit and reminding us all that “I did this, I did that, it was I, I…so I…”
    11. All the Government bashers come out to play. The OZ claims “Business is upset” but only seem to quote people with strong Liberal connections.

    Sickening.

  6. cheryl hunt

    Major dummy spit by Costello. I understand that most of the appointees to the future fund, were by Costello, so no surprises that they would root for him. Furthermore, under Costello the bulk of the future fund is invested in big tobacco companies and nuclear power. Well now doesn’ t that just say it all about where his head is at! Costello may have put all the money in the future fund, but a lot of that money ought to have been bankrolling our infrastructure.

  7. zut alors

    For P Costello it appears the Future Fund offered only a limited future.

    Why it is a scandal or controversial that a government instrumentation has not become an automatic pseudo-retirement home for a former parliamentarian?

  8. Arty

    We all get the job we are entitled to.

    Don’t we?

  9. shepherdmarilyn

    Poor widdle Cossie, unloved and unwanted.

    This most ineffectual and lazy treasurer thinks he has a right to what ever he wants.

    Spoilt brat.

  10. davidk

    I understand David Murray is skeptical of human induced climate change. I wonder where Gonski sits.

Telling you what the others don't. FREE for 21 days.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.