mmm … ‘My First Policy by Tony Abbott’ displayed on a copy holder, there, in the header … mmm … me seriously thinkit this is ‘My First Baby-Steps Policy by Aony Tappit’ (adjusts pince-nez).
A policy on bathers, not on swimmers, Zut!! Innocent Until, are you egging Zut on or just opinionating regards this as an attempt at apolitical correctness?
Wouldn’t it be funny if they did call a snap election. Bereft of policies, Knuckles would be caught with his bathers down and would have very little to talk about…..in more ways than one.
Innocent Until: Pun alert. Swimmers, yes, bathers … swimmers are also wrigglers (the wrigglers that make babies) … double entendre (my exclamation means ” a policy on bathers, not swimmers [after all].”
Regards my quip about correctness: I was teasing further by asking if you were ‘egging’ Zut on, thus attempted a follow-up biological quip taking gender into consideration. I asked further…or [are you] in general opinionating for apolitical correctness [ie that the word ‘swimmers’ ought not be used but bathers].
I attempted to fool/tease as well by playing the characters, Zut Alors and Innocent, tongue-in-cheek.
Please let me know if this explanation does not suffice. Accept all my humble apologies. (yellow jello gooey melting face).
31 thoughts on “Juliar vs The Babies”
klewso
February 29, 2012 at 4:32 pm“Brer Rabbott and the TA baby”?
And here’s one I prepared earlier!
(And I think it depends on how you cook them – wrens not babies.)
Sandshoe
February 29, 2012 at 5:21 pmmmm … ‘My First Policy by Tony Abbott’ displayed on a copy holder, there, in the header … mmm … me seriously thinkit this is ‘My First Baby-Steps Policy by Aony Tappit’ (adjusts pince-nez).
Sandshoe
February 29, 2012 at 5:26 pmA policy on bathers, not on swimmers, Zut!! Innocent Until, are you egging Zut on or just opinionating regards this as an attempt at apolitical correctness?
drmick
February 29, 2012 at 5:36 pmWouldn’t it be funny if they did call a snap election. Bereft of policies, Knuckles would be caught with his bathers down and would have very little to talk about…..in more ways than one.
drovers cat
February 29, 2012 at 5:57 pmIf Jasper does come up with a winning strategy for the Bad Abbott,
will it be a case of pulling a rabbit out of a cat?
yeah, ok, it’s late in the day …
Andybob
February 29, 2012 at 6:35 pmFrame 3, is Jasper giving Tony the bird ?
Mike Jones
February 29, 2012 at 9:50 pmDrovers, thanks for a lift at the end of an otherwise depressingly grey day.
I particulardly move a langled sentrance.
Innocent Until
February 29, 2012 at 11:43 pmNot at all, ‘shoe; just nostalgiaising. Bathers is Adelaidean for what Sydneyites call swimmers.
May I second MJ’s salute, Drovers Cat.
Holden Back
March 1, 2012 at 10:26 amTogs, anyone?
Sandshoe
March 1, 2012 at 11:47 amInnocent Until: Pun alert. Swimmers, yes, bathers … swimmers are also wrigglers (the wrigglers that make babies) … double entendre (my exclamation means ” a policy on bathers, not swimmers [after all].”
Regards my quip about correctness: I was teasing further by asking if you were ‘egging’ Zut on, thus attempted a follow-up biological quip taking gender into consideration. I asked further…or [are you] in general opinionating for apolitical correctness [ie that the word ‘swimmers’ ought not be used but bathers].
I attempted to fool/tease as well by playing the characters, Zut Alors and Innocent, tongue-in-cheek.
Please let me know if this explanation does not suffice. Accept all my humble apologies. (yellow jello gooey melting face).