Police reveal ‘culture of illegal payments’ at Murdoch’s Sun
Crikey media wrap: The Murdoch-owned UK Sun tabloid is embroiled in an illegal government official payment scandal, the head of police investigations into journalistic behaviour told the Levenson Inquiry.
The Murdoch-owned UK Sun tabloid is embroiled in an illegal government official payment scandal, after the head of police investigations into journalistic behaviour told the Levenson Inquiry of a culture of illegal payments to corrupted officials.
Deputy assistant police commissioner, Sue Ackers, told the inquiry that it wasn’t an isolated issue. The “corrupted officials” included people working within policy military, prison services, government and health services.
“The cases we are investigating are not ones involving the odd drink, or meal, to police officers or other public officials,” Akers told the inquiry. “Instead, these are cases in which arrests have been made involving the delivery of regular, frequent and sometimes significant sums of money to small numbers of public officials by journalists.”
One official had received over 80,000 pounds from the News International owned paper, while others received regular retainers.
“There appears to have been a culture at the Sun of illegal payments, and systems have been created to facilitate such payments whilst hiding the identity of the officials receiving the money,” said Akers.
The revelations may result in US authorities pursuing Rupert Murdoch’s News Corporation under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.
It was damning evidence, reports David Leigh in The Guardian: “Akers’s reference to the systematic nature of alleged corruption, and its endorsement by senior executives, will be a clear signal to the US department of justice that her allegations, if proved, fall squarely within the ambit of the US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. Rupert Murdoch’s US parent company, News Corporation, could face fines of hundreds of millions of dollars unless it can show it has co-operated vigorously with the authorities in rooting out malpractice.”
“I believe that where the problem may have become significant is that a very small number of relatively senior officers increasingly became too close to journalists.
“Not, I believe, for financial gain, but for the enhancement of their reputation and for the sheer enjoyment of being in a position to share and divulge confidences.
“It is a siren song. I also believe that they based their behaviour on how they saw politicians behave, and that they lost sight of their professional obligations.’
News Corp’s management and standards committee handed over a number of incriminating emails to police for their investigations. So far ten staff at The Sun, two police officers, an army official, someone from the Ministry of Defence and a relative of a public official have been arrested over the allegations.
The revelations come as Rupert Murdoch launched a Sunday version of the paper just last week, which sold 3.26 million copies.
“The phone-hacking scandal never was simply a story about journalists behaving badly: it was and is about power.
On Monday, in an outbreak of peculiarly destructive evidence, Lord Justice Leveson’s courtroom became a battlefield for two parts of a defining power struggle.
The first was short term. In the past few weeks, those who lost some of their power last summer, when the facts of the scandal finally erupted, have been trying to reclaim it. In 20 minutes of deftly understated evidence, Deputy Assistant Commissioner Sue Akers sent them packing.”
Meanwhile, back at the News of the World phone hacking scandal, singer Charlotte Church settled her hacking claim against NotW for 600,000 pounds. She had originally wanted to take it to a full trial, but had changed her mind after the cost — both personal and monetary — was weighed up.
“You just have to look at the court room, look at News International and their 25 lawyers and then look at the individuals with maybe their three lawyers and one barrister and a couple of juniors,” Church told The Guardian. “You are fighting a massive corporation with endless resources, a phenomenal amount of power and it is just made really difficult.”
Lord Prescott, former deputy British PM and a victim of the NotW hacking, told the Levenson inquiry about the power that News International yielded with police:
“There is always a price. It is not exactly corruption: they do have interests, power, and in the Murdoch press it is particularly organised to achieve that. I never went to a social do. I thought you paid too much of a price for it. All of the leaders of the parties, and I include [David] Cameron, they believe you have to have access to editors as though they act independently [of Murdoch]. And then the paper [the Sun] says ‘we won it’.
“It is absolutely clear to me that News Group were able to rely upon the inadequate police investigation to justify its (untrue) claim that the wrongdoing was limited to one person at the News of the World. For four years the MPS [Metropolitan Police] did not contradict any of these claims. In my view, the MPS has supported and assisted an organisation guilty of criminal behaviour and prioritised this over the fights of thousands of potential victims, including ordinary people whose privacy rights had been seriously violated and who knew nothing about it.
That is deeply shocking. The public duty of the MPS is to deal with crime and to protect victims of crime. In this case they appeared to have protected the perpetrators and misled the victims.”
Today’s Guardian front page is pretty great as well, particularly with this image of Rupert Murdoch’s faced constructed with photos of phone hacking victims — both alleged and proven.