Menu lock

Federal

Feb 21, 2012

Rudd rumblings: no Left turn yet, with Vic MPs still wavering

Sources inside the federal Labor caucus have questioned the wisdom behind media reports claiming the "Victorian Left" have unanimously rounded behind Foreign Minister Kevin Rudd, pointing instead to a fluid situation in which caucus members are still wavering.

The latest story to feed this week’s leadership speculation feast and add to the rising sense of momentum behind Kevin Rudd was splashed across The Sydney Morning Herald this morning, as the paper reported that loyal Kim Carr enforcer Senator Gavin Marshall had ratcheted up his support of Rudd, preparing a petition to corral the required 35 signatures needed to force a spill motion when federal parliament resumes next week.

But sources close to the federal Labor caucus have questioned the wisdom behind media reports claiming the “Victorian Left” has unanimously rounded behind Foreign Minister Kevin Rudd, pointing instead to a fluid situation in which MPs are still wavering. Jagajaga’s Jenny Macklin and Ballarat’s Catherine King stand in the way of unanimous Left support for the Foreign Minister and the positions of others are not at all clear.

A source close to Families Minister Macklin said she “unequivocally” supported the leader owing to her position inside Cabinet, while King maintains her own regional fiefdom and notionally sits outside the Carr axis anyway owing to her past in the fringes of the Pledge Left (officially reunited with the Socialist Left in 2009).

That leaves Carr, Marshall, retiring numbers man Alan Griffin, Harry Jenkins, Laura Smyth and Maria Vamvakinou all notionally supporting Rudd from the Left south of the Murray. But a senior Victorian source told Crikey each MP had different motivations and should not be forced through a distorted factional lens.

“The position among the national Left caucus reflects the diversity that they have as a group. The idea that people are voting on strict factional lines doesn’t reflect reality,” the source said.

There are some historical reasons why the major poles of Left influence in Victoria — comprising Griffin and the humiliated Carr — might support Gillard’s rolling. Griffin’s clique remembers Gillard’s treachery in imposing herself on the Victorian branch and battling with Franz Timmerman, Lindsay Tanner and Gaye Yuille in the 1990s before cutting a preselection deal with the Right, while Carr is still smarting after his recent ejection from Cabinet (even though, in 2010, he organised numbers for Gillard).

In the current context, Rudd is preferred simply because he could elevate the party’s primary vote to over 30%.

The confusion over caucus support was illustrated in The Weekend Australian, which published a graphic with members spread over three columns (Undecided/Gillard/Rudd). In Victoria Darren Cheeseman appeared in both the Gillard column only hours before calling on the Prime Minister to resign. Cheeseman was previously a strong Gillard acolyte but is also loyal backer of Carr’s view of the world.

Of Rudd supporters on the broad Victorian Right, two SDA-aligned MPs, Chisholm’s Anna Burke (consistently ignored in front bench promotion decisions) and Holt’s Anthony Byrne (Rudd’s former flatmate and parliamentary secretary) have unsurprisingly fallen in behind their friend, a move that also reflects both MPs’ estrangement from Labor Unity circles dominated by Bill Shorten and Stephen Conroy.

Of the non-Ruddites, Simon Crean has popped up to remind the public of his svelte leadership skills as a “faction of one”, while Mark Dreyfus, Richard Marles, Rob Mitchell, Michael Danby all support Bill Shorten’s official diktat issued last night on Q&A. Brendan O’Connor continues to support Gillard from the soft left, as does Nicola Roxon from a position of cabinet solidarity.

A curio surrounds Martin Ferguson’s pro-Rudd position — a supporter of Gillard in the late 1990s but over the last decade clashing over “personality issues” and suffering the indignity of having some of his energy programs moved to a new “independent” authority at the behest of the Greens.

One erroneous media figment that continues to crop up is the idea that Gillard somehow maintains an alliance with the “Victorian Left”. Gillard was expelled from the SL in 1997 as she prepared to do a deal with the Right to snag preselection in Lalor. Every since, she has maintained an unofficial alliance with Michael O’Connor, and after the 2010 leadership spill emerged as the handmaiden of the NSW Right.

“It would be like Greg Williams claiming loyalty to Victoria after moving to the Swans,” a senior Left source noted this morning, recalling the champion centerman’s controversial $120,000 defection from Geelong to Sydney in 1985 to follow coach Tommy Hafey to Harbourside glory.

Also of interest was NSW general secretary Sam Dastyari’s humorous pronouncements to “support the leader” given the NSW Right’s notorious revolving door policy at state level. Dastyari is, in fact, unable to enforce solidarity in a fluid caucus.

Meanwhile, an “anyone but Rudd” alignment continues to gather pace as soundings growing louder for the inoffensive but uninspiring Stephen Smith.

We recommend

From around the web

Powered by Taboola

61 comments

Leave a comment

61 thoughts on “Rudd rumblings: no Left turn yet, with Vic MPs still wavering

  1. Jimmy

    TIme to give this story a rest, Rudd has less than 30, Gillard has more than 50 and the “undecided’s” will fall behind Gillard if for no other reason than Windosr & Oakeshott threatening to send them to an early election.

  2. puddleduck

    FFS. Gillard ‘ a dream to work with’, but unpopular with the people. Rudd the other way around. Can’t remember where I read that, amongst all the tealeaves the media is serving up on this story at the moment.

    Isn’t the simple, obvious answer, that they work together? Isn’t that what was meant to happen with Rudd as leader and Gillard as Deputy? But then something went wrong, it was all off, or it was all “on”, as the sportspeople and fighters amongst us might say.

    I can only think that egos are to blame. And more than 2 of them.

  3. Col in Sydney

    It’s impossible to understand how anyone can suggest this is a media beat up. And it isn’t really a leadership challenge either.

    Gillard is the most unpopular prime minister in history. Every single criteria on which she relied to knife Rudd now applies to her to the nth degree.

    Labor under Gillard will be wiped out at the next election. She is not going to turn around the simple disgust with which so many Australians now regard her.

    Rudd doesn’t have to challenge. Give the simple reality time to trickle into the consciousness of the trolls the Labor Party puts into Parliament and they will be begging Rudd to take over.

    The only reason anyone in the caucus is baulking at Rudd’s return is the expectation of the very well deserved castration they can expect for their disloyalty to him in the first place.

  4. Whistleblower

    Whatever happens, Gillard is a doomed leader in the eyes of the Australian public , and will lead Labor to annihilation at the next election issue if she is not replaced. As usual, factionalism is more important than political survival, otherwise Rudd would already be back in the PM’s office.

  5. shepherdmarilyn

    Enough already, it seems to me the media in Canberra are more entertained than anyone else.

  6. Jimmy

    Whistleblower – As Howard demonstrated when the election comes around a lot of the BS disappears from the voters mind and they start focusing on policies, the MRRT, NBN and Private Health Rebate are all popular, the Carbon tax will be less scary when it is being lived and the ALP will increase Helath & Education spending as election promises (Gonski for example) and Abbott’s massive hole in his costings will become an issue and he will not be able to match the ALP’s spend.

    Whether this is enough to get the ALP across the line who knows but it will be closer than a lot think.

  7. Hugh (Charlie) McColl

    So the factions that tossed Rudd out (for knifing them over selection of the ministry) have discovered how wrong they were, how untimely was their intervention and now how powerless they are in managing and manipulating public perception. Those same factions are being driven to the wall by Rudd and he will stand on their necks, even while he’s out of the country, until they collapse in a screaming heap. Rudd will be applauded by half the electorate, his stocks will rise and the future of the ALP government will again be in the hands of the Australian electorate. I’m afraid Our Julia will simply disappear – a waste really but then she could have said ‘no’.

  8. Oscar Jones

    If the idea that Julia Gillard is so unpopular because she rolled the elected prime minister Rudd, why does anyone think that by doing exactly the same and rolling the elected prime minister Gillard for Rudd or anyone else for that matter, that things will change.

    Alternatively the Labor Party could unite behind the current leader, who despite the false claims, has actually achieved things and perhaps their ratings would improve.

    At least it might get the frigging loathsome Canberra press gallery of our backs.

  9. liliwyt

    All of this leaves the Australian public questioning the wisdom behind media reports of any kind

Leave a comment

Telling you what the others don't. FREE for 21 days.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.