Federal

Feb 15, 2012

The tent embassy: fact v fiction, black v white

There is perhaps no event in the last few decades that better sums up the divide between black and white Australia than the debacle that engulfed the Embassy celebrations.

Chris Graham

Tracker managing editor

There is perhaps no event in the last few decades that better sums up the divide between black and white Australia than the debacle that engulfed the Embassy celebrations. It had everything: media misreporting; white political mischief; black political disunity; police violence; frustrated activists. And it had the odd rat-bag, black and white. If nothing else, the debacle that engulfed the Tent Embassy celebration has once again exposed to the rest of the world the racist underbelly of a very ignorant nation. But first the facts, because a lot of people have formed opinions on the Embassy based on media reporting. And that is almost always a bad idea. The Embassy celebrations kicked off with a large march through the streets of Canberra. It was loud and proud – by some margin the most inspiring march I’ve been to. It was a festival atmosphere and a celebration in every sense of the word. There was virtually no mainstream media present, certainly nothing comparable to the pack that would descend on the Aboriginal Tent Embassy a few hours later. The rot began to set in shortly after lunch on January 26, when one of Julia Gillard’s senior media advisers, Tony Hodges, phoned Kim Sattler, a union official who was visiting the Tent Embassy. According to the official version of events Hodges told Sattler that Tony Abbott had just been interviewed by media about the Embassy, and he expressed the view that it was time to move on. But what Sattler passed on to Embassy activists was something else altogether. Audio of the exchange between Sattler and young Central Australian Aboriginal leader Barbara Shaw, reveals that Sattler says Tony Abbott has just told the press the Tent Embassy should be “pulled down”, not that it’s time to move on.  It’s a pretty subtle difference, but Shaw relays that message – pulled down -- to the crowd, word for word. Shaw then directs people to The Lobby Restaurant, a few hundred metres from the stage. The rest, as they say, is history. Or in this case, the whitewashed version of history. Several hundred protestors descended on the restaurant. A small handful of them began banging on the glass walls on two sides of the building. The crowd was chanting ‘Shame’ and ‘Racist’. The object of their anger was Tony Abbott. Anyone who has seen the footage can understand that Abbott, Gillard and in particular their security minders had reason to be concerned. Protestors were furious at what they’d been told Abbott had said. After half an hour, Gillard’s security detail is captured by a Channel 9 news crew informing the Prime Minister that they’re becoming increasingly concerned for her safety, and have decided it’s time to go. The subsequent images of Gillard being bundled out of the restaurant are startling. Gillard looks terrified as she’s rushed to her vehicle, surrounded by her personal security team and police, including one with a riot shield. Not surprisingly, the story made headlines around the world. The fact that Gillard stumbled and lost her blue suede shoe in the process only added to the colour. Also not surprisingly, the vision sparked widespread outrage among average Australians – news sites that offered the opportunity for comment on the issue were inundated. Overwhelmingly the responses from readers were negative. The coverage from the ABC – supposedly the moderate national broadcaster – best sums up the unfolding media circus: ‘Gillard puts on brave face after riot rescue’. It’s a pretty compelling headline. It’s also complete bunkum. The ‘riot’ – at a glass-walled restaurant, mind you – saw not one pane of glass cracked, let alone broken. There were no arrests and no injuries. It was a loud, angry protest. Nothing more. Of course, it did have the potential to get out of hand, but all protests do. It’s worth noting, the only damage to the Lobby restaurant was to a door – the one which Gillard is rushed through as she exits the building. And who caused the damage? Police. The National Capital Authority, which owns the building, inspected the Lobby the day after the protest, and confirmed to Embassy organisers that the AFP had broken the door in its haste to leave. Not only was there no riot, but there was never any actual threat to Gillard’s safety, nor that of Abbott. As footage that emerged after the media had already written the script clearly showed, the only people pursuing Gillard and Abbott when they were rushed from the building were police, journalists and photographers. There were no protestors within coo-ee, and certainly none chasing down a terrified Prime Minister nor an Opposition Leader, who can be clearly seen smirking and smiling as he’s rushed to the car. But that’s not such a newsworthy story. So instead, we got this, from Channel 9:
“They made for the safety of a getaway car. The only thing between them and an angry, raging mob were police with shields. “The Prime Minister, cradled by an officer, lost her shoe, stumbled slightly in the mayhem, the moment of terror, captured here on Julia Gillard’s face. “Tony Abbott was pushed to the waiting car. “When she got to the vehicle you can see Julia Gillard shoved inside. “And in a sign of the danger, the rare sight of Mr Abbott bustled in beside her.”
The media reporting gave the widespread view that Gillard had somehow been attacked, as the comments on news sites consistently showed. But in defence of the Channel 9 journalist, he did get one aspect of his story right: he noted that AFTER the Prime Minister’s vehicle left, the violence began. One of the most memorable images from the ‘riot’, at least from the Aboriginal perspective, is footage captured by a news crew of a police officer punching an Aboriginal man – dressed in traditional costume and carrying a spear – in the face). It can be seen 15 seconds into this clip.

The images were replayed around the globe – BBC World News, for example, used the footage over and over again during its coverage of the event. Alternative footage, captured by an embassy activist, sheds new light on this officer’s behaviour, and what led up to the assault. Shortly after Gillard’s vehicle has left, the protestor’s footage shows the officer unleash a barrage of abuse – and blows – at protestors and media. At 1:05 he comes into the shot screaming “Media f**k off or get out. Get out media, get out”. He turns his attention to a cameraman from SBS and yells, “F**k off c*nt,” before manhandling a sound technician. The exchange clearly shows the officer as the aggressor. At 1:17 the cop starts yelling, “Move rear, move rear. Move f**king rear,” as he continues to push and swing at protestors, before finally hitting one of them in the head (at 1:28). At 1:30,a second cop stars in the video, with wild eyes and a huge grin on his face, nodding his head and willing protestors to take him on, all the while pushing and manhandling them. As soon as one protestor yells “Get him on camera”, the cop seems to realize he’s being filmed, wipes the smile off his face and steps back from the crowd. The camera pans back to the red-headed officer, who is now in full-swing, literally. He’s screaming “Get back off the road idiots” as he pushes more protestors. You can hear one off camera respond, “Little f**king big man. Little big man, pushing people eh?” It draws the attention of the officer, who responds by pushing him in the chest. The protestor replies, “Hey, you push me, I’ll spear you brother.” The cop pushes him again, and you see the protestor push the cop back. The cop looks down at his own chest – an act which people widely interpreted to mean he was spat on (he wasn’t) - then hits the protestor in the head. You can’t actually see the hit – it’s slightly off camera. But it’s of such force that you can certainly hear it. The news footage BBC ran shows it nearly knocked the protestor off his feet. What follows is one of the more ironic images from the demonstration. Tiga Bayles, an early Embassy activist and a former Queensland Father of the Year, steps into the frame and blocks the cop, saying ‘No, no, no, it’s alright’. Other protestors – including the first man assaulted -- also surround the cop to prevent further attacks. It’s not often you see groups of peaceful protestors having to step in to try and calm a police officer down. The cop keeps pushing and swinging until a female protestor puts her hand on his shoulder (at 2:04) and says, "You are inciting, you are inciting." Like his colleague earlier, the cop’s demeanor changes completely – he seems to realise that everything he’s just done has been captured on film. He stops yelling, and starts pleading, “I’m just trying to get you off the road.” Seconds later, Sergeant Chris Meagher – a community liaison officer who spent the five days working cooperatively with Embassy officials -- can be seen walking into the shot, and removing both officers from the front line of the confrontation. A protestor can be heard yelling, "This officer here is way too pumped up. The officer in the middle, this one right here.” You can hear someone reply, “Yeah, we got him.” And remember, all of this occurred AFTER Gillard has left the scene. The supposed threat has gone. So why the police violence? A measure of how pumped up the red haired officer was before confronting protestors is captured in this video. 

Free Trial

You've hit members-only content.

Sign up for a FREE 21-day trial to keep reading and get the best of Crikey straight to your inbox

By starting a free trial, you agree to accept Crikey’s terms and conditions

96 comments

Leave a comment

96 thoughts on “The tent embassy: fact v fiction, black v white

  1. Jim Reiher

    Chris Graham – Suzanne Blake is determined to ignore all the facts and stick to her bizarre belief that there was a riot and labor was to blame and Labor was trying to get Abbott physically hurt or even killed, … because she was saying that kind of thing yesterday in another crikey article blog space. The timing of your article has been most helpful to put her frightened ideas to rest. Pity she just cant accept the facts.

  2. David Hand

    A lovely spin followed by another lovely spin. Beautiful to watch. Yep, all Tony had to do was step outside for a friendly chat with a crowd of people interested in dialogue. Julia could have sat with him for a glorious new paradigm of a civilised Australia.

    Yeah right.

  3. Venise Alstergren

    @JIM @ADVOKATO: SB lives in a rural area. This means she gets all her lack of information from The Weekly Times.

  4. Jim Reiher

    David: nobody is saying that there was not a frustrated and noisy crowd there that day. But think about it: not a pane of glass got smashed, or even cracked. No cars turned over. No cars set on fire. No rocks thrown at the police…. And the only actual phsycial violence between some protestors and police happened after all the main politicians were gone.

    So: a riot?….. No way. Those who say that are nuts. Since when is a noisy protest a riot? Isn’t that a part of democracy? Freedom to protest, freedom to call politicians to account? Freedom to assemble?

    For those who call what happened a riot, they are falling into the 1984 Orwellian double speak: Changing words to mean new things so that they can rewrite history the way they want to.

  5. Bill Hilliger

    Footage showing the sheer look of terror on Tony Abbott’s face whilst being hustled away by police behind Julia Gillard said it all – he will always run in second place when the going gets tough. I’m surprised not to have heard Tony in this instance exclaim “oh well, shi*t happens”! Instead the usual opposition effort to blame Julia Gillard personally for aiding and abetting in setting it all up was entirely predictable. Thanks to Chris Graham for the excellent article we now find out how overblown (by the media) and farcical the whole fiasco really was. The supressed panic look on Tony’s face was priceless.

  6. feelgoodcause

    You only have to be in the thick of a protest with a handful of particular protesters who are a small minority to the majority of well behaved to understand those particular protesters will do ‘anything’ to draw the pack media of which only happened when there was a perceived danger. They travel the country to fill their people with hatred.

    Last time I was amongst a particular indigenous person who attended a protest day the said person had enthralled so much anger in nearby indigenous a large kitchen knife was produced; a day when the Prime Minister was prior present and observed by police.

    The end result was a stunt that had the officers take reasonable cause for caution based on past previous scenarios. As usual the media will focus on officers indiscretion outnumbered by some ignored disgusting aggressive dangerous behaviour based on a whisper. Yeah, intelligent bunch of people right there.

    Then there was the flag burning footage and the child spitting on the Australian flag. If my child spat on an indigenous flag Id clip him round the ear then drag him off for the spray of his life.

    The media divide and conquer, the same minority ‘professional’ protesters divide and conquer again inciting violence. Professional protesters that disgrace their elders and the future indigenous children that receive the result of their actions. Tony Abbot has more respect for their children than they do.

    Its same old, same old. Next!

  7. feelgoodcause

    Imagine if it was The President of the United States?

    Bang, bang, they shot me down?

  8. davidk

    Yes great piece. It seems that if video footage is available any construct of the facts is acceptable to the MSM, and the more dramstic the better. Truth comes a very poor third.

  9. Peter Ormonde

    Innit interestin’ … here you have a “race riot” – sorry RACE RIOT – right on our very national doorstop on our very national day… and all anyone can talk about is who said what to whom when… gossip and conspiracy.

    Nuffin at all – not a bloody word – about why they were there these black ambassadors … again, after all this time. Not a word about why these outraged people sniffing out conspiracy and scandal are quite comfy with the idea of a RACE RIOT… like well what else would you expect… saw it coming… we’re always having RACE RIOTS here. The real scandal doesn’t get a mention.

    Aside from the glaringly obvious – that this looked more like a family Christmas gathering than a RACE RIOT – it speaks volumes about how issue-shy – how de-politicised – how trite and trivial our political discussion has become.

    Maybe in five years time we’ll be seeing real riots. Then who will we blame?

    You did it. No you did. No she did. … and meanwhile the reality of Aboriginal life and death grinds on.

    Orestraya … where only the ore is refined.

Leave a comment

Share this article with a friend

Just fill out the fields below and we'll send your friend a link to this article along with a message from you.

Your details

Your friend's details

Sending...