To cut straight to the chase, the “correct” answer is $15 billion. Or at least that’s the widely accepted estimate.

It’s cited in this 2010 story quoting the chairman of Infrastructure Partnerships Australia, Mark Birrell; in this 2011 interview with former deputy PM and rail enthusiast Tim Fischer; and more recently in this submission by the Australian Airports Association to the federal and NSW government’s Joint Study on Aviation Capacity in the Sydney Region.

But where the hell did this figure come from? How accurate and reliable is it? Was it estimated by a technically skilled and independent body?

Thanks to the diligent research of one of The Urbanist’s many smart readers, I can tell you that $15 billion figure first appeared in a 2010 report by industry lobby group Infrastructure Partnerships Australia (IPA), titled A realistic pathway to very fast trains. This impressive-looking report says (page 48):

“In 1999, the cost for the second Sydney airport was reported to be in the region of $6 billion to $8 billion. A more recent media article said the cost of building a second Sydney airport had inflated to $15 billion.”

That “recent media article” appears to be the real source. But here’s the interesting bit — the report says it’s an article titled Do The Numbers Support The Very Fast Train?, published byThe Melbourne Urbanist, on May 3, 2010.

Now I was flabbergasted to read that because I know the said Melbourne Urbanist rather well — after all, I am he (or at least I was up until three weeks ago when I came across to Crikey and shortened my moniker to The Urbanist). I can therefore tell you with the utmost authority that The Melbourne Urbanist did not estimate the cost of a second Sydney airport to be $15 billion. In fact The Melbourne Urbanist never attempted to estimate the cost. Period.

This is what I actually said in that post on Very Fast Trains (VFTs, also known as HSR, for High Speed Rail) on May 3, 2010:

“The cost of a second Sydney airport at Badgery’s Creek was estimated at between $6 billion to $8 billion in 1999.  Clearly the viability of a VFT will be greatly influenced by how much a new airport and associated transport links cost. If it were to cost around $15 billion and emit similar levels of GHG during construction then a VFT would be competitive on the assumptions I’ve made here.”

Cleary, my figure of $15 billion wasn’t an estimate of what it would cost to build a second airport; rather, it was an estimate of what it would need to cost in order to make high-speed rail between Sydney and Melbourne viable. I was referring to the fact that the lower the cost of a second airport, the less likely it is the numbers would stack up for high-speed rail.

Peter Fray

Get your first 12 weeks of Crikey for $12.

Without subscribers, Crikey can’t do what it does. Fortunately, our support base is growing.

Every day, Crikey aims to bring new and challenging insights into politics, business, national affairs, media and society. We lift up the rocks that other news media largely ignore. Without your support, more of those rocks – and the secrets beneath them — will remain lodged in the dirt.

Join today and get your first 12 weeks of Crikey for just $12.

 

Peter Fray
Editor-in-chief of Crikey

JOIN NOW