Jan 11, 2012

The car industry’s (not so) merry-go-round

It's only three years since the car industry was last rescued. Meantime, other parts of manufacturing have got on with the job of lifting productivity.

Bernard Keane — Politics editor

Bernard Keane

Politics editor

Here we are again, just over three years on from the last effort to save the automotive industry …

In November 2008, it was an extension of what became the Automotive Transformation Scheme to 2020, a Green Car fund (since mostly nixed in budget cuts) and some structural adjustment support for component manufacturers. Total cost over a decade: several billions of dollars, to support around 50-60,000 jobs.

Free Trial

Proudly annoying those in power since 2000.

Sign up for a FREE 21-day trial to keep reading and get the best of Crikey straight to your inbox

By starting a free trial, you agree to accept Crikey’s terms and conditions


Leave a comment

32 thoughts on “The car industry’s (not so) merry-go-round

  1. Modus Ponens

    You also forgot the perpetually protected aluminium industry which the Grattan Institute wrote: that because the smelters are so old and inefficient that if they stopped being subsidised and closed down to have their market share replaced by existing smelters overseas – would see a significant drop in global C02 emissions…

  2. Gavin Moodie

    Quite right.

    On Monday Crikey posters sought protection for farmers and food manufacturers to protect ‘food security’. On Tuesday governments announced more protection for 1 car manufacturer, with presumably more to come. Keene anticipates more protection for steel and defence manufacturing. As the protected sectors multiply they increase pressure on the remaining efficient parts of the economy, and of course cost all consumers and taxpayers.

  3. John

    Car protection costs $300,000 per job per annum.
    It’s a price which is not worth paying.
    It will be cheaper to retrain and even relocate the car workers.

  4. D. John Hunwick

    Once again BK has hit the nail on the head. Australia should have at the most one car manufacturing plant and it should be producing electric vehicles and/or other “green” cars that will be needed in a world that won’t be using much of coal or oil (too expensive in the near future). One does not need a degree in economics to conclude that propping up a specific industry like petrol guzzing cars is uneconomic let alone foolish from an environmental view. Plan now to reemploy car workers – using the money to be invested in “saving” GM or Ford. There is something grotesque about governments giving these bastards hand-outs when they can’t even run their own industry properly. But as BK says – they can’t do that unless they feel directly the cold winds of change. Let’s get on with it now.

  5. chpowell

    GM, Ford: The ultimate corporate welfare queens. They don’t even make vehicles which Australians want to buy-on a permanent bailout trajectory!

  6. Edward James

    If Australians are so clever. Why would our Federal Government keep doling out our tax dollars by the hundreds of millions to keep an overseas company in business in Australia? when will our representatives resolve to build australian transport for Australians we have the resources and we have the expertise. Edward James

  7. Daniel

    Provided adequate support is provided to workers who will lose their jobs if/when the Holden plant closes down there shouldn’t be too much of a problem. I live in Elizabeth, and I don’t want to see this place become a rust-belt satellite city a la Flint, Michigan or Detroit due to the whims of global capitalism.

    Above all, priority should be given to the people who will lose the most. This group does not include the capital owners or the poor-dear ‘taxpayers’.

  8. Maxwell

    I worked briefly at Mitsubishi in 2001. I started the day after 9/11, and the expectation was that since the Magna was exported to Saudi Arabia, production was probably going to drop off once hostilities in the Middle East got underway. So it proved, and I was laid off 2 months later.
    More interesting is a remark made by our foreman during the induction – according to him, Mitsubishi’s second-in-command had a tour of the Adelaide plants back in 1993, and wanted to close it all down there and then.
    So the general consensus around that place for years had been that it was only a matter of time before it did get shut, and all the state and federal money poured in was only prolonging the inevitable. Auto manufacture actually only accounts for, like, 0.5% of what Mitsubishi Corporation does worldwide (they’re mainly in finance nowadays), so it seems they thought car-making was just too insignificant to bother with and had spent some effort trying to get out of South Australia. It might be a conspiracy theory, but apparently the 380 was deliberately designed in such a way that it would fail in the marketplace and give them the perfect exit strategy.
    Unfortunately, our politicians forgot to slug them with a big fat Leaving Town Tax equivalent to all the funds they’d lapped up in decades prior. Call me old-fashioned, but I thought the way capitalism was supposed to work was that firms bribed governments, not the other way around.
    Mitsubishi escaping Adelaide in the ’00s meant that thousands went jobless (me included), and I acknowledge no government wants to be seen letting that happen without a fight (albeit a fight against the taxpayer on behalf of the corporation). Still, I can’t help thinking that if we’d just told them to go in 1993, those workers would still have lost their jobs – except they’d all be ten years younger (and we all know how hard it is to be re-employed the older you are) and the taxpayers wouldn’t have been pissing – no, gushing – in the wind.
    Moral of the story: If businessmen can’t run their operations without public money, then they’re not real businessmen. If they’re not real businessmen, they should be arrested for fraudulently posing as businessmen, their operations should be seized and sold off at auction. The end.

  9. Peter Bayley

    Holden and Ford have had the inside running – through subsidies etc and squandered the advantage for far too long. This is normal behavious for a protected industry anywhere in the world. The people have decided and they have voted for the God of Wisdom, Intelligence and Harmony (Ahura Mazda). Bolstering inefficient, lazy industries NEVER works – all it does is prevent innovation elsewhere. Forget the petrol engine – we can import them cheap as chips – especially as the Great Wall department really gets cracking. Instead lets pay 60,000 engineers $300,000 a year each to come up with the worlds best sustainable / low pollution alternatives. In a country like Australia with so much abundant alternative energy it’s a crime we are not leaders in the field. Besides, we DON’T have a car industry anyway. We pay for some bloated US has-been companies to make their cars here rather than in Asia – big deal. The world’s changing rapidly, people. Time to wake up and take an initiative (somewhat different to the solar panel fiasco). Who knows, in a few years we might be exporting the Solaroo XR2000 all over the world

  10. Edward James

    Yes the world is changing rapidly, and while that happens labor federally is busy selling off gas, and subsidizing over seas car builders. So we Australians can get busy fracking ! Edward James

Leave a comment

Share this article with a friend

Just fill out the fields below and we'll send your friend a link to this article along with a message from you.

Your details

Your friend's details