Menu lock

Australia

Dec 2, 2011

Bonhomie thick at ALP conference as the deal-making begins

Prime Minister Gillard kicked off ALP National conference proceedings at the Sydney Convention Centre this morning by adopting Obama's/Optus' “yes” refrain, presumably to distinguish Labor from Tony Abbott’s negativity.

The National Union of Workers is holding firm to its decision to back the ALP National Left to avoid the prime minister’s conscience vote on gay marriage, despite suggestions from the party’s Right that they had “binded” on the issue.

A senior NUW source at the party’s 46th national conference told Crikey this morning that last night’s pronouncements of unity following the Right’s 300-strong right caucus meeting and widely reported in the media, had been made in haste.

It did not include their 10-strong delegate bloc that brings the Left to within nine defectors of striking the PM down with a majority of 201. The addition of the Right’s ACT Deputy Chief Minister Andrew Barr and Victorian MP Danielle Green draws that gap to just eight. Independent delegates and others from the right’s 218 delegates could easily see the conscience vote shot down.

NUW National Secretary Charlie Donnelly was seen at one point locked in friendly discussions with Left wing AMWU chief Dave Oliver to plan their next move. Crikey understands that earlier Donnelly was personally summoned by the prime minister’s office to explain himself.

On the sidelines of conference a senior Left MP confirmed they weren’t giving up on the proposition and the situation was “enormously fluid” despite members of the socially-conservative Shop Assistants Union backgrounding journalists overnight on the Right’s non-decision to bind.

As Crikey reported on Wednesday, the move by the Left to defy the prime minister and amend the party’s platform to specifically provide for gay marriage is almost certain to pass.

Left and right caucuses are currently meeting again to refine their positions.

Gillard kicked off proceedings at the Sydney Convention Centre this morning by adopting Obama’s/Optus’ “yes” refrain, presumably to distinguish Labor from Tony Abbott’s negativity. The PM decided to take the personalised approach, name-checking everyday Australians who found success selling dog biscuits, another suffering from a skin infection and someone else with a dodgy hip.

A complicated triangular narrative linking jobs to growth to fairness and back to jobs had some delegates scratching their heads, although most still found the time for a standing ovation.

Some on the Left may well have been reluctant to embrace the moment after a last minute scramble to avoid a skirmish to pick delegates to the national executive. Late last night, a grab-bag of Left-wing union heavies including Dave Oliver, Nadine Flood, Louise Tarrant and Michael O’Connor were all persuaded to hold their fire in their earlier bid to snag one of the nine spots reserved for their faction on the party’s powerful ruling body. The Left’s representatives, formally announced as Crikey’s deadline approached, are all incumbents.

Other partial highlights this morning including Left convener and official spokesperson Doug “Doog” Cameron delivering an impressive sledge on Wayne Swan’s surplus fetish, calling on the government to go into deficit to protect jobs instead. The Senate firebrand also railed against “Armani anarchists” and “Twiggy no tax” in a call for a boost to the Minerals Resource Rent Tax.

However, Cameron reserved his greatest opprobrium for former Treasurer Peter Costello, slamming him as “lazy and gutless”. “The press should actually do some critical analysis of the state he left this country in,” Cameron said.

In response, Wayne Swan said it would be “nuts” to impose a financial transactions tax while Europe was in crisis. The amendment, the first contested vote at an ALP conference since 2007, was defeated on the voices.

This afternoon is expected to see debates on climate change, with Bob Carr corralling premiers from the “class of 2003” to speak out as detailed on his popular Thoughtlines blog.

ACTU secretary Jeff Lawrence will spruik pro-union amendments around unstable work flagged at a rousing breakfast this morning on casualisation that featured a Qantas pilot who railed against his CEO Alan Joyce’s intransigence. While some attendees expressed some reservations over the state of the skim milk, the progressive vibe was palpable.

The enthusiasm was echoed last night at the Left’s “Challenge” party as delegates ate out of Anthony Albanese’s hand when he muttered his “no-alition” zinger and revealed his historic support for gay marriage. A Rainbow Labor event at the nearby Belvedere Hotel was sold out and standing room only.

But whether the bonhomie can be translated into wins on the conference floor remains to be seen.

*Andrew Crook will be reporting from the ALP conference all weekend — stay tuned to the Crikey website for updates

We recommend

From around the web

Powered by Taboola

22 comments

Leave a comment

22 thoughts on “Bonhomie thick at ALP conference as the deal-making begins

  1. TimRichards1

    When you think about it, it’d do the ALP membership drive a world of good for the conference to overrule the prime minister and therefore indicate a measure of power attached to being a party member. And Gillard could shrug it off by saying “That’s democracy” and looking magnanimous in defeat. I suspect the sky would stay fixed in its current position.

  2. Edward James

    Keep up the good work Andrew. Crikey subscribers enjoy the extra source! Edward James

  3. puddleduck

    I doubt the PM cares about the conscience vote really – it’s just to be seen to be doing, for the conservatives inside the party (and amongst the, ahem, swinging voters). Defeat or victory, it doesn’t matter, as long as she’s tried.

    However, I don’t get why it’s important to let labor MPs vote with their conscience about whether consenting adults formalise their relationship using the m word, but not to let the same Labor MPs vote according to their conscience on the slaughter of fully conscious animals.

    Oh, I remember now. It’s all politics, innit? I keep thinking the ALP has principles. Silly moi.

  4. Suzanne Blake

    How about: YES to an election, so we can made judgements on the li es.

  5. scottyea

    If you can accept my apology via correspondence “You can stuff politics right up there, what I wantto know is why , no matter what party generally is in government for whatever spell , are taxes increasing while public services decrease?”

    Let’s see if the Labor Party union of minds can produce a policy on that.

  6. Hugh (Charlie) McColl

    Scottyea, I don’t know what state you reside in but here in Queensland there has been a noticeable increase in “public services” this year – probably directly connected to the natural disasters sent by the gods.
    Last year and the year before, “public services” were increased all over Australia as the Rudd/Gillard government rolled out the Education Revolution (school halls) program. You would have to say this was a pretty visible piece of public service which kept many, many businesses afloat so that very few people (except the usual suspects) were whining about it. Have you just become accustomed to the negativity of the Noalition?

  7. shepherdmarilyn

    Oh Suzanne, give the lies bit a rest. We are all pretty much over it.

    And if we had an election every time a pollie lied we would have them every day.

    A conference that tries to bring back law breaking over refugees and enshrine further bigotry against one section of the community to pander to the moron right is not much of a conference.

    Add to that the vile selling of uranium to an unstable nuclear power with an unstable nuclear neighbour being enraged by it and we are surely plumbing the depths of stupidity.

  8. Edward James

    @ shepardmarilyn. Anyone paying taxes and rates, who is willing to put up with lying politicians betraying our trust. Is simply wrong if they believe accepting lies from elected representatives will somehow result in honest open representative government! Edward James

  9. Neild Ed

    It might be obvious. But I would have thought that Gillard wants the Left to oppose her. In the same way that she wants an “open” conference. And a bit of distance from the Greens.
    Isn’t it about the next election?

  10. Stevo the Working Twistie

    Anyone who cares about same s-x marriage should have a jolly stern word with their local Shop Assistants Union member. Of course, they are all rather butch and scary though.