Nov 17, 2011

Liberals exposed as kingmakers in bitter chicken spat

A shadowy astroturf group led by two Liberal Party operatives has emerged to bend public opinion in the bitter Baiada poultry workplace dispute.

Andrew Crook — Former <em>Crikey</em> Senior Journalist

Andrew Crook

Former Crikey Senior Journalist

A shadowy astroturf group led by two Liberal Party operatives has emerged to bend public opinion in the bitter Baiada Poultry workplace dispute.

A press release was distributed yesterday on behalf of a so-called “People Power Group” comprising “non-union” employees of the chicken processor, which is locked in a stand-off with its unionised workforce over wages and conditions.

Free Trial

Proudly annoying those in power since 2000.

Sign up for a FREE 21-day trial to keep reading and get the best of Crikey straight to your inbox

By starting a free trial, you agree to accept Crikey’s terms and conditions


Leave a comment

6 thoughts on “Liberals exposed as kingmakers in bitter chicken spat

  1. John Bennetts

    It’s hard to believe that, so far, there are no comments.

    This article has disclosed exactly the type of undercover flag-of-convenience work that too often appears as management’s response to reasoned union action.

    After refusing to negotiate fairly or in good faith, the script reads straight to provoking legal action, initiation of court action whenever the workers’ representatives do anything, act the bully and stand behind a row of hired bullies.

    Bullies in the court, using as tools bulk supplies of money and the services of gun for hire lawyers.
    Bullies in the public arena – in this case, failed and discredited stooges from a political party not yet comfortable with losing not one federal election but two in recent years, a party which has demonstrated unthinking, policy-free blind opposition to everything on knee-jerk almost religious grounds.

    A party which bases its claims of legitimacy on an assumption that, since they were born to rule, these two election results must have been wrong and should be set aside, with more and more elections until the electors get it right.

    It’s no surprise, then, when there is trouble at the docks or the chicken processing works or Dollar Sweets or wherever the number of workers is greater than a couple of hundred, that management with born-to-rule attitudes are seen to be receiving clandestine support from the Liberal Party of Australia’s dirt team.

    Thanks for placing these goings-on on the public record.

  2. puddleduck

    They aren’t the only workers being abused by Baida. Everyone’s forgotten about the chickens, who pay with their lives.

    The ACCC is taking Baida to court for misleading conduct, in claiming the chickens unfortunate enough to fall into their clutches are “free to roam: – here’s the ACCC media release:

    If you eat chicken, you owe it to yourself, and the birds, to read this:
    “The modern phenomenon of “cheap chicken” comes at enormous costs to the welfare of the animals involved.”

  3. geomac

    The incident where a security guy nudges the workers line with his car had to be a set up. Tv camera there to capture the response of the workers o the provocation . Was the camera crew there the day before or even hours before the set up. You can safely assume they were there in time to capture what they hoped would be anger at a bouncer type stooge pushing his car into the line. If bosses can,t or won,t use genuine negotiation imagine how brutal they would have used workchoices. No wonder the public were repulsed by that draconian IR law. As seen with Qantas the bosses still have the upper hand in disputes yet still squeal like stuck pigs.

  4. Mac4U

    GEOMAC…you can also assume that the TV crew were the same that were at Canberra’s Parliament House when the unionists smashed down the front doors!!! … another set up!!!

  5. geomac

    Two different situations and size of participants. Parliament house which has its press gallery always at the ready and the publicised protest. A section of the protesters broke the law and probably to attract media attention. Compare that to a small picket line that has barely raised a few inches of column space and no concerns about safety. Along comes the goon to intimidate the line by nudging them with a car and the tv crew is there to record it. They were not there the day before or the day after. One illegal action by protesters is quite different from peaceful workers being provoked by a security thug to create a reaction for the camera. Why focus on what happened when its better to muddy the water with something else unrelated ?

  6. Lord Barry Bonkton

    The guy with the Man Boobs and camera looks like he was on Australia’s Biggest loser.

Share this article with a friend

Just fill out the fields below and we'll send your friend a link to this article along with a message from you.

Your details

Your friend's details