Menu lock

Federal

Nov 7, 2011

Accessing free publicity from an uncritical media

Access Economics benefits from free publicity from the biggest media outlets in the country. And what does it do with it?

Bernard Keane — Politics Editor

Bernard Keane

Politics Editor

Ah, the time-honoured rituals of the Australian fiscal cycle.

In the first week of May, every year, as tension and excitement — well, OK, mild interest — mounts in Canberra over the last remaining unleaked details of the budget, economic consultants Access Economics (these days part of Deloitte) produces its own economic and fiscal forecasts, in accordance with its status as a sort of alternative, private sector Treasury. The media accords these forecasts the same status as if they were inscribed on stone tablets and hauled down from Black Mountain nearby, and Chris Richardson, with his finely honed instinct for the proximity of any live camera or microphone, is all over the media, speaking authoritatively about what will happen in the coming years.

Now, as the fiscal cycle has expanded to make MYEFO a landmark event, Access has responded by making a big event of its own mid-year forecasts. And didn’t they get a lot of bang for their buck today, with front pages on The Oz, The Age and The AFR and follow-up media coverage. Just shows what releasing a report on a lazy Sunday (an old Access approach) can do.

As Glenn Dyer and myself have lamented before, Access’s prediction record is none too flash (and I should know, given my own dreadful prediction record), but this doesn’t seem to perturb the media, which enthusiastically details the latest Access forecasts down to decimal places. Apart from the annual ritual throughout the 2000s of predicting that the mining boom was about to collapse, there was its 2008 prediction that unless Wayne Swan went Hannibal Lecter on spending, interest rate hikes would be needed to stop rampant inflation.

By that stage, the threat of the US financial crisis was already enough for Swan and Treasury to put the meat axe away for fear of dramatically cutting demand going into a slowdown, a judgment that subsequent events vindicated. Then there was Access’s early 2009 warning that it would be “impossible to avoid a recession”. The Rudd government promptly did exactly that.

Where this gets more serious than how prediction is a mug’s game and people forgetting the track record of consultants is what Access does with the remarkable free publicity it generates for itself. Access is an economic consultancy that hires itself out to anyone who wants an “independent” economic research report to strengthen their case. And Access isn’t shy about taking sides on major public debates. There was its intervention, paid for by the Distilled Spirits Council of Australia, in the alcopops debate, labelled “as dodgy as a three-day-old kebab” by Nicola Roxon. Then there was its pro-industry efforts to sway the debate over carbon pricing — for the Australian Industry Greenhouse Network and the states, and its work for the big miners over the RSPT (on both the industry’s current tax rate and the apocalyptic consequences of the RSPT), just to name a few.

Access was the groundbreaker of the economic consultancy industry that has emerged in Canberra in the past 20 years like a carbuncle on the public policy process, an industry that is shameless in offering anyone with enough money the imprimatur of “independent modelling” for their cause. It has been one of the key reasons  economic reform has become harder for those politicians committed to it, because every industry affected by reform can now craft its own self-serving modelling to argue why it should receive favourable treatment. The media are the enablers of this process, willing to uncritically run such reports either as part of a partisan agenda, or simply because they lack the interest or resources to subject reports to some critical analysis before running them.

And when you’re in the position that Access is in, of having the media give you free front-page advertising, it’s a licence to print money.

We recommend

From around the web

Powered by Taboola

41 comments

Leave a comment

41 thoughts on “Accessing free publicity from an uncritical media

  1. Suzanne Blake

    Access just trot out research that lying Gillard wants? Alco Tax, RSPT you name it

  2. Damien

    As Rory Robertson said at the start of the GFC: “There are two types of economist – those who don’t know and those who don’t know they don’t know”. Says it all.

  3. cicero

    The ABC leads the way when it comes to fawning over Access Economics. Tonight’s bulletin will have Mr Richardson up near the front as usual despite as you rightly point out, they get it wrong as often as they get it right

  4. Jimmy

    SB – Is that a statement or a question? Plus if you actually read the article you would see that access took the side of those opposing the govt on those issues.

    This economic modelling for hire reached it’s worst point in the lead up to the last election when Abbott got his policies costed by a private firm. The fact that he was later shown to have an $11b hole shows you can get what you pay for.

    As an aside the govt must have had a good week last week, the Sun gave dear old Andrew a special column today to bag Gillard out, the must be getting worried.

  5. john2066

    Actually Suzanne, Access was acting FOR the Alcopops industry, and for the miners against the RSPT.

    Acesss are a joke, pompous twits in suits who will produce a report and ‘modelling’ to support any old garbage argument their clients are making.

  6. beachcomber

    Didn’t the Coalition get Access Economics to check their figures before the last election?

  7. Suzanne Blake

    I use to work for a company that did Government “research” I was in a different area, but knew people in there and it was all crafted to suit the government position, with solid backup and talking points

  8. Mick Devine

    Ah, so you expect the media to be more critical? You expect journalists to understand economics? Since reading in Saturday’s Townsville Bulletin that “there is a 50/50 chance of above-median rainfall this summer” I’ve given up.

  9. fredex

    Who pays the piper calls the tune.

    Usually its not the government, sometimes it is.

    During the Howard COALition government years both groups [govt and so-called ‘independent’] joined forces overwhelmingly to spread the corporate agenda with right wing ‘think’ tanks, media and govt all parroting the same agenda [eg IPA, CIS] and with well documented examples of the silencing any independent research or thinking from govt depts.
    CSIRO for just one of many examples.

    It was a huge problem, Labor, to its credit, has not indulged in the silencing of expert opinion to quite the same degree as did the COALition, but it still occurs.

    I suppose the worst offender is the media, including their ABC, who regularly trot out ‘research fellows’ [read ‘ideologue] of think [sic] tanks to push their rightist line.
    Even Crikey succumbs.
    The IPA brag about their success in penetrating the media.

  10. SusieQ

    I was quite annoyed to hear the ABC running with this both on the morning prog and the radio news – lots of free publicity for Access and lazy journalism by Aunty and all the others who just reprint the summary of the report.

    I know our media can do better, but do enough people care?

Leave a comment