Nov 7, 2011

Accessing free publicity from an uncritical media

Access Economics benefits from free publicity from the biggest media outlets in the country. And what does it do with it?

Bernard Keane — Politics editor

Bernard Keane

Politics editor

Ah, the time-honoured rituals of the Australian fiscal cycle.

In the first week of May, every year, as tension and excitement — well, OK, mild interest — mounts in Canberra over the last remaining unleaked details of the budget, economic consultants Access Economics (these days part of Deloitte) produces its own economic and fiscal forecasts, in accordance with its status as a sort of alternative, private sector Treasury. The media accords these forecasts the same status as if they were inscribed on stone tablets and hauled down from Black Mountain nearby, and Chris Richardson, with his finely honed instinct for the proximity of any live camera or microphone, is all over the media, speaking authoritatively about what will happen in the coming years.

Free Trial

Proudly annoying those in power since 2000.

Sign up for a FREE 21-day trial to keep reading and get the best of Crikey straight to your inbox

By starting a free trial, you agree to accept Crikey’s terms and conditions


Leave a comment

41 thoughts on “Accessing free publicity from an uncritical media

  1. Suzanne Blake

    Access just trot out research that lying Gillard wants? Alco Tax, RSPT you name it

  2. Damien

    As Rory Robertson said at the start of the GFC: “There are two types of economist – those who don’t know and those who don’t know they don’t know”. Says it all.

  3. cicero

    The ABC leads the way when it comes to fawning over Access Economics. Tonight’s bulletin will have Mr Richardson up near the front as usual despite as you rightly point out, they get it wrong as often as they get it right

  4. Jimmy

    SB – Is that a statement or a question? Plus if you actually read the article you would see that access took the side of those opposing the govt on those issues.

    This economic modelling for hire reached it’s worst point in the lead up to the last election when Abbott got his policies costed by a private firm. The fact that he was later shown to have an $11b hole shows you can get what you pay for.

    As an aside the govt must have had a good week last week, the Sun gave dear old Andrew a special column today to bag Gillard out, the must be getting worried.

  5. john2066

    Actually Suzanne, Access was acting FOR the Alcopops industry, and for the miners against the RSPT.

    Acesss are a joke, pompous twits in suits who will produce a report and ‘modelling’ to support any old garbage argument their clients are making.

  6. beachcomber

    Didn’t the Coalition get Access Economics to check their figures before the last election?

  7. Suzanne Blake

    I use to work for a company that did Government “research” I was in a different area, but knew people in there and it was all crafted to suit the government position, with solid backup and talking points

  8. Mick Devine

    Ah, so you expect the media to be more critical? You expect journalists to understand economics? Since reading in Saturday’s Townsville Bulletin that “there is a 50/50 chance of above-median rainfall this summer” I’ve given up.

  9. fredex

    Who pays the piper calls the tune.

    Usually its not the government, sometimes it is.

    During the Howard COALition government years both groups [govt and so-called ‘independent’] joined forces overwhelmingly to spread the corporate agenda with right wing ‘think’ tanks, media and govt all parroting the same agenda [eg IPA, CIS] and with well documented examples of the silencing any independent research or thinking from govt depts.
    CSIRO for just one of many examples.

    It was a huge problem, Labor, to its credit, has not indulged in the silencing of expert opinion to quite the same degree as did the COALition, but it still occurs.

    I suppose the worst offender is the media, including their ABC, who regularly trot out ‘research fellows’ [read ‘ideologue] of think [sic] tanks to push their rightist line.
    Even Crikey succumbs.
    The IPA brag about their success in penetrating the media.

  10. SusieQ

    I was quite annoyed to hear the ABC running with this both on the morning prog and the radio news – lots of free publicity for Access and lazy journalism by Aunty and all the others who just reprint the summary of the report.

    I know our media can do better, but do enough people care?

Leave a comment

Share this article with a friend

Just fill out the fields below and we'll send your friend a link to this article along with a message from you.

Your details

Your friend's details