Facebook Google Menu Linkedin lock Pinterest Search Twitter

Advertisement

Federal

Oct 19, 2011

The media release the minister should've written on the NT Intervention

Here is a draft alternative media release for Jenny Macklin -- what she should have said as a response to the current consultation rather than harping on about truancy and grog.

The following is a draft alternative media release for Jenny Macklin (and what she should have said as a response to the current consultation rather than harping on about truancy and grog!).

I want to again say sorry! Despite our 2008 apology, this government made more policy  mistakes and added to the pain of indigenous people. The intervention we inherited had already failed to engage the local communities and unfortunately we have continued down this path. The latest consultations showed that we still have not really listened to the local communities as local groups told us clearly that we needed to change the way we do policy and programs, i.e. bottom up, culturally appropriate programs.

So rather than announce more punitive Canberra-devised programs to be put in place, we are going to start by shifting decision making power to a real partnership with local Aboriginal communities. We will sit with people for days, not hours and try to unwind the bad stuff from the good. This time we will not arrive with a paper already written on what we intend to do, but really start by asking what people want to change. This is what you told us and we have heard it this time.

Next time we won’t ask the bureaucrats, local and Canberra-based to run things because we know that makes it harder for you to say what you think. We will allow you to manage the processes and pick the facilitators. We will listen when you say that schools have to engage culturally and socially with parents and children, so they want to be there.

So we need to fund extra resources to make the serious changes that will satisfy local people and their school. Then we understand that attendance will rise.

We understand that we need to work collaboratively and build trust and goodwill rather than start by forcing attendance by cutting payments.

It’s time for the federal government to seriously reassess how we do indigenous policy. We have been told by the head of the Productivity Commission and the Australian Institute of Heath and Welfare that programs work if they are bottom up, culturally appropriate, long term and engage local people. We have not yet adopted this model and it’s time we did. We still make decisions quickly in Canberra, put words in the mouths of those we consult and decide what we think is good for them.

This is why much of the intervention has failed. We have spent a lot of money on staffing and personnel. Income management costs us $80 per week in administration and we now think this money could be better spent in local communities supporting those with need for support on payments. Some new data and some earlier studies show that income management is seen as a negative and shaming by a high proportion of those who are  compulsorily covered by it. So we will not expand it.

There have also been studies showing it has not improved the food purchasing of families and other indicators that, rather than improving self-control and management, it may be making recipients even more dependent on others. We will therefore abolish compulsory income management and stop pressuring on people to stay on it. Autonomy comes from  giving people choices about the assistance they need. Of course, seriously incompetent individuals and families who need case management will still be eligible. However, we will no longer assume incompetence just because people are on a certain payment or maybe find it difficult paying bills on a very low income.

It is now more than four years since the intervention started and nearly four years since my government took it over. Our record is not good. There are no improvements in many indicators such as school attendance, despite extra teachers, hospital admissions, health indicators, child abuse notifications, suicides or other such hard data indicators. There are some improvements in service numbers but we are not sure whether these are being effective. We have to acknowledge that our latest report gives not outcome figures, just records the many extra bureaucrats and service providers we brought in.

Abolishing CDEP, as employment, has undermined many local services and enterprises. The consultations also exposed anger that many new local jobs were filled by outsiders. The shires have reduced local employment and control, and limiting resources on outstations has caused serious distress. As many residents of these often have better health status than those in larger townships, we are restoring  CDEP funding and prepared to look at how we make these communities more viable.

This time we will take into account all the stuff that people told us. Despite the limits of the process and short time frame, it was obvious that people want us to stop making centralised punitive decisions and work with them. We respect what people tell us in its entirety, and this time the government will not cherry pick the comments that agree with what we wanted to do before we started the process.

Again, my apologies for what we have done by failing to listen to indigenous communities and our own advisory bodies. This time we have heard you and we are genuinely resetting the relationship.

Jenny Macklin

(I wish.)

Advertisement

Advertisement

We recommend

From around the web

Powered by Taboola

17 comments

Leave a comment

17 thoughts on “The media release the minister should’ve written on the NT Intervention

  1. Jim Reiher

    Terrific. Wouldn’t it be something else if such was the case…..

    But hey… I am just sitting here looking out my office window watching all those pigs flying….

  2. Michael James

    Terrific, Crikey’s army of columnists have nothing better to do than make krap up.

    Whatever happened to reporting and analysing the news? Or is that so pre-Twitter and factual content doesn’t count anymore for pseudo-bloggers?

    If I wanted sophomoric (or was that sophomoronic) attempts at political fantasy I can find that in student newspapers.

    I pay my subscription for news and analysis, if I want left-wing diatribes, well any number of bloggers do it so much better for free.

    Crikey used to be known for political news and breaking stories, however that seemed to suffer a blow when “Hillary Bray” aka Christian Kerr departed, and has not improved since.

  3. JMNO

    It would be nice to think that Canberra-based bureaucrats might come to trust the community to know its own needs and how best to meet them but I’m not holding my breath.

  4. davidk

    Once again Labor rehashes a failed Howard gov’t policy and expects us to believe it works. The sooner they reinstate the anti discrimination act and try to work within its’ parameters the better.

  5. kennethrobinson2

    The onl thing that has been accomplished, is that all people have been inconvienenced, by having to show identification to purchase takeaways, which some pass on to the ones blacklisted, but I suppose someone is profiting from this stupid scheme

  6. nicolino

    One would think that after 223 years we could come up with something that doesn’t smell of paternalism. Seems not and here they are about to get a whacking great pay increase.
    For what?

  7. Solomon Grundy

    Perhaps Ms Cox should spend some time in Aboriginal communities and with (cultural) Aboriginal women before she starts shooting down policies.

    “shifting decision making power to a real partnership with local Aboriginal communities” was what was done in the self-determination period of the 80s and 90s and it is what failed that generation of Aboriginal people. Those women are the ones who can’t read or write and rely on their grandmothers to act as interpreters at every meeting they have with Centrelink, the police, their GP, etc.

    I know so many Aboriginal women who are grateful for income management. It stops their men from spending it on grog, ganja or gambling, and stops family standing over them, threatening or actually using violence to spend what is quarantined. It means kids don’t go hungry for the few days prior to the next payday.

    Income management works. My eyes have seen it help people in a huge way and remarkably empower Aboriginal community women. I’m sorry if it is inconsistent with your worldview but this piece from such an accomplished writer does the women I work with no favours.

  8. David Lowe

    … a well-respected and long-term friend of mine wrote: “Eva Cox should try living in my street and see if she feels the same. Fact is, some parents DON’T care about their kids and a future for their kids, some ppl LIKE being oxygen-thieving wastes of space. No amount of middle class romanticizing will change the fact that some ppl like to blame everyone else for the failure of their lives. Where i live needs an intervention, coz no amount of decent free schooling and healthcare makes a difference to ppl who don’t think further than their next centrelink payment. Anyone who wishes to condemn me is welcome to come spend some time with me in my neighbourhood.”

  9. Peter Ormonde

    Again … a denunciation of the intervention without a single mention of child abuse!

    It’s all about process innit? About letting communities run themselves – about giving “everyone” a voice… Trouble is – it didn’t, this endless consultation.

    Instead it led to a widely corrupt and dysfunctional system of patrimony and nepotism – and no one – no one – gave the victims of abuse, the raped girls, the bashed and neglected kids a voice at these endless chats. It led to a system where traditional law was deformed and distorted to become a system of gang violence and revenge.

    Instead the perpetrators were protected, were elevated within the process, the issue was buried, accepted, denied. The consultation process is full of perpetrators and their protectors. Full of them.

    There are very real problems about the intervention – about everything we do in our dealings with Aboriginal people. The road to hell is paved with the most caring of concerns. It it was women and kids put in that hell Eva. People you would normally be first to defend. If they were white.

    To sit back and do nothing while the next generation – perhaps the last generation – is brutalised and deformed by a neglect and abuse is completely and utterly unacceptable. This is not a moral or ethical issue – it is about survival.

    Make up a press release about that Eva. And have a chat to Bess Nungarrayi Price first.

Advertisement

Telling you what the others don't. FREE for 21 days.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.