Oct 11, 2011

Cutting The Monthly … violence in Egypt …

Across the inner cities of the world, goes out the cry these days -- has The Guardian completely lost the plot? That's due to rising prices and making the paper a crowd sourced affair. Plus, other media news of the day.

What’s going on at The Guardian? Across the inner cities of the world, goes out the cry these days — has The Guardian completely lost the plot? Three weeks ago, the paper edition of what is increasingly a news site had a hefty 20% price hike, to £1.20 an issue — enough of a psychological barrier for many former addicts to wonder if we really needed it every day. Then editor Alan Rusbridger posted a “letter to readers” in which he claimed among other reasons for supporting the paper, the WikiLeaks/cablegate stories — months after its journalists had written a peekaboo book about the affair, traduced their source in numerous stories, and sold the book to Hollywood.

Now, news editor Ian Katz is sourcing stories on Twitter:

Free Trial

Proudly annoying those in power since 2000.

Sign up for a FREE 21-day trial to keep reading and get the best of Crikey straight to your inbox

By starting a free trial, you agree to accept Crikey’s terms and conditions


Leave a comment

4 thoughts on “Cutting The Monthly … violence in Egypt …

  1. Steve Carey

    Re “What’s Wrong At The Guardian?”: couldn’t disagree more. As an exile I don’t see the print edition, but I visit the website and have the iPhone app and read both (each depending on my location) voraciously. The Guardian feels to me like a paper with real vigour and energy, cf the ways it uses data, its coverage of the MP rort stuff, its lone voice howling about the News International hacking scandal, its imaginative and intelligent coverage of the recent riots… the list goes on. As for it opening its daily newslists, this is just part of the gradual breaking down of the “we the journos” versus “you the great unwashed,” recognising that when news happens (such as the riots, or the London bombings), technology has now made it possible for, literally, the Man on The Clapham Omnibus to capture and transmit, if not broadcast, it.

    If the nearest Australia has to the Graun is The Aged, the SMH and the Australian, which would YOU choose? Gimme my Guardian. Every day.

  2. michael r james

    Guy, the reason for the 20% price increase, as ineffectual as it may be, is that–as you surely must be aware–it is losing something like £50 million per year! (So, even with it and the Observers feeble circulation of <250k per day, it would bring in an extra £18m.) Even more than any Murdoch paper (NY Post, or The Australian, reportedly about $50M and $25M losses respectively). It can only do this because it is funded by the Scott Trust but one wonders how sustainable this is. And obviously this is why there is often discussion about how long they can persist with the free online access model.

  3. Guy Rundle


    – i didnt say the paper wasn’t good, hence the first sentence. i was asking whether some of its recent strategies werent a bit whacky. as far as breaking down the barriers goes, that would be better done by a more inclusive and open editorial structure rather than getting readers to do unpaid newsgathering and feedback. the centre of the guardian remains unchanged.


    – so the price rise is to earn more money. well i never. i wasn’t bewildered about that, i was bewildered about the way they were going about it

  4. Andrew

    Just out of interest, the Al Ahram headline reads “Egypt bleeds in Maspero”.
    “24 dead and 313 injured in confrontations between Copts, army and security”
    “Minister of Justice: Military prosecution has begun its investigation today into the circumstances of the events”
    “Sharaf (Egyptian PM): What happened is not sectarian tension, but a conspiracy for the downfall of the state”

Share this article with a friend

Just fill out the fields below and we'll send your friend a link to this article along with a message from you.

Your details

Your friend's details