Clancy Moore writes: Pan-a-ma…

If you shut your eyes and say the word, you probably think of white straw hats, the famous shipping canal or the 2001 movie adapted from John le Carre’s spy novel, the Tailor of Panama.

Invest in the journalism that makes a difference.

EOFY Sale. A year for just $99.

SAVE 50%

For Panamanians, its meaning is grounded in place and nature, as they believe Panama means “an abundance of fish, trees and butterflies”.

So what will Panama bring, with its natural themed meaning, to the next round of UN climate negotiations starting this Saturday?

Panama is the last opportunity before the important UN Climate Summit in Durban, South Africa (November 28 – December 9) for the negotiators to make progress on key issues around the scale of emission reductions, the UN Climate Fund and the future of the Kyoto Protocol (the current global agreement to tackle climate change set to end in 2012).

On emission reductions, negotiators will continue to grapple with the gap between current emission reduction pledges and the amount needed to limit warming to below the 2 degrees — the target set at last year’s climate summit in Cancun.

To provide some context, Australia is currently aiming to reduce emissions by 5% by 2020 on 2000 levels whilst Britain is aiming to reduce emissions by 50% by 2025 on 1990 levels. In addition, recent research by Oxfam estimates that over 60% of emissions cuts by 2020 are likely to be made by developing countries. It is clear that rich countries, like Australia, need to do more.

Last weekend’s meeting of G20 finance ministers in Washington also provided some meaning for these talks. Bill Gates announced his support for a financial transaction tax (also known as the ‘Robin Hood Tax’) to contribute to the $US100 billion a year needed to help poor countries adapt to climate change. This week, European Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso unveiled the EU’s planned Financial Transactions Tax arguing that banks must make a contribution back to society after the €4.6 trillion of taxpayers’ money they have received in the last three years.

These announcements will no doubt impact upon the negotiations around the UN Climate Fund in Panama and Durban. Australia is reluctant to talk about some of these new sources of climate finance at the UN talks, preferring to commit money from the aid budget.

On the issue of the Kyoto Protocol — the international agreement signed in 1997 which recognises “common but differentiated responsibilities” meaning that developed countries have a greater responsibility to reduce emissions — debate will continue around agreement on a second commitment period.

For Australia, the negotiations in Panama are significant. The carbon pricing legislation has entered parliament, with the House of Representatives set for a vote on October 12. We know that the world is watching to see if we will pass the legislation prior to the Climate Summit in Durban. If so, it will likely add much needed momentum to the climate talks.  It will help us catch-up to international efforts to deal with climate change.

I will be tracking progress from Panama and Durban via tweets, blogs and videos so sign up for regular updates or follow me on twitter @clancymoore.

Until then, here are some interesting, amusing and somewhat bemusing facts about Panama…

  • In the early 80s it was illegal to jog or exercise in Panama whilst wearing a white t-shirt and beige trunks!
  • Almost 30 million kilograms of dynamite was used to excavate and construct the Panama Canal in 1901.
  • Panama is the only place in the world, where you can see the sun rise in the Pacific and set in the Atlantic.
  • Ropa vieja (old clothes) is a common Panamanian dish made up of shredded beef served, chili and rice.

Clancy Moore is blogging from the UN negotiations in Panama (Oct 1 – 7) as part of Oxfam Australia’s UN Climate Tracker project

Save this EOFY while you make a difference

Australia has spoken. We want more from the people in power and deserve a media that keeps them on their toes. And thank you, because it’s been made abundantly clear that at Crikey we’re on the right track.

We’ve pushed our journalism as far as we could go. And that’s only been possible with reader support. Thank you. And if you haven’t yet subscribed, this is your time to join tens of thousands of Crikey members to take the plunge.

Peter Fray
Peter Fray
Editor-in-chief
SAVE 50%