It’s the deliciously bitchy tale of a non-existent cream puff, the media’s obsession with skinny models and Australia’s largest department store chain.

To promote the relaunch of its plus-size range Big is Beautiful, Myer recently ran a modelling competition aimed at “real” women who wear dress sizes of 14 and above (i.e. the majority of Australian females). The event was a PR coup for the brand and Myer received walltowall coverage of its use of professional and “everyday” catwalk models. But what did the models get in return — apart from a rabid fashion media calling them “fat”?

The Big is Beautiful competition offered the chance for 40 finalists to go to Sydney for a judging, from which a final 10 were awarded a spot to walk alongside curvy model-of-the-moment Robyn Lawley in Myer’s Big is Beautiful catwalk parade for the Sydney Fashion Festival. The overall winner would be bestowed with a $5000 Myer wardrobe, a 12-month contract with Bella Model Management and a $2000 “style make-over”.

So far, so good.

Sadly, this isn’t the heart-warming tale of a fashion retailer caring for its consumer, curves and all.

Myer didn’t cover any travel, food or accommodation costs for the model competition entrants — many who travelled interstate.

In comparison, the 2011 Girlfriend Rimmel modelling competition covered the cost of flights and accommodation for finalists travelling to Sydney for its final shoot. It also offered to pay travel costs “in its complete discretion” of contestants who were preselected to attend the state finals but didn’t live in the capital cities. City Chic, a plus-size clothes brand, ran a modelling competition with BGM models to win the chance to walk in its parade at the L’Oreal Melbourne Fashion Festival in March. City Chic covered the costs of flights, accommodation and meals for the winner.

But while Myer didn’t pay costs, it did happily pimp out contestants to media outlets for interviews about the Myer parade. It arranged for press interviews and gave competition winners Myer clothing to wear for accompanying photo shoots. But it failed to provide any advice or support to non-professional “real” sized models dealing with a potentially hostile fashion media. And how hostile it turned out to be …

In an opinion article in The Sydney Morning Herald last week, fashion writer Georgina Safe recounted how she’d recently interviewed two of the competition winners, including Yvette Coyne, a first-time model from WA. Safe wrote:

“Like many women of fuller figure, they said they felt marginalised by fashion’s fixation on thinness. They professed they ate healthily and took care with their appearance — they were simply bigger-boned girls.

Then came the clanger. Coyne told me that when she heard she had been selected for the show, she thought: ”Oh, I can eat a cream puff now or a few cream puffs and it won’t matter, in fact, it will be a good thing for the show. But then I felt guilty, so I didn’t.”

Problem is, Coyne never said the words “cream puff”. Instead, after Safe had put her notebook away, making it appear the interview was over, Coyne made a comment about looking forward to eating and checking out Sydney restaurants now she’d been selected. The other model being interviewed, Tanya Briggs, told Safe not to use the eating quote, because years ago she’d said a throwaway line about cream puffs in an interview and subsequently the main focus of the article had employed the stereotypical “fat girl eating” angle, despite the fact that she’d mainly spoken about being comfortable in her own body.

A week later, Brigg’s “cream puff” reference appeared in Safe’s article, attributed to Coyne.

Coyne’s response? “I can honestly say I never uttered those words. She was so nice when she interviewed me that I’m shocked that she would do that … I felt like ordering some cream puffs from a local Sydney bakery and sending them to Georgina.”

The rest of Safe’s opinion article questions why plus-size models are being encouraged on the catwalk. “The simple fact is that clothes look better on beautiful, slender young women,” declared Safe.

“The whole point is that there women who are a size 16 and plus and they want to know how clothes look on women that size,” replied Coyne.

After Coyne and Crikey contacted The Sydney Morning Herald, the offending quote was removed from the article on Tuesday afternoon and a correction run in yesterday’s paper:

Safe — a former fashion writer at The Australian — was apparently inspired to write her column about reading this article in The Australian by Damien Woolnough on Myer’s plus-size parade.

Woolnough declared “Big can be beautiful but fat should never be in fashion.” “Most of the models looked healthy but some looked obese. While most fashion festivals ban models for being too skinny, why is it OK to see fat women on the runway?” he asked.

Bella Model Management, whose models walked in the show, fought back against the claims of obesity in an article on its Facebook page. “To use the word ‘obese’ to describe any of the women involved in Tuesdays show, professional model or competition winner, without having the statistics of each is ignorant, and a blatant attempt to cash in ‘controversy currency’ and grab headlines,” wrote the plus-size modelling agency.

But it wasn’t all bad news. Myer got impressive international and national coverage for its plus-sized parade. Media monitors counted 117 mentions in the Aussie press in the past month for the Myer parade, thanks to 34 television mentions, 35 press mentions, seven radio mentions and 41 internet mentions. Global coverage — covering the parade and the backlash — came from the US (including well-known gossip blogger Perez Hilton’s fashion blog Coco Perez), the UKCanadaNew Zealand, the Netherlands and even Ghana.

What did the competition model finalists get in return for spruiking the store? A Myer gift pack worth $25.

They covered all their own expenses — although several had to either fly home interstate or stay in Sydney for the week between the final judging and the catwalk show (it clearly states in Myer’s terms and conditions of the competition that “Travel to and from and all other expenses associated with this event are at the participants’ expense.”)

Many had to purchase new nude-coloured underwear for the parade. The non-professional models were forced to practise in the hallways of the Myer office at the back of the store and only got the chance to practise on the actual catwalk an hour before the show started, although they say minus-sized models in other shows were given ample time to practise on the real catwalk, despite being accustomed to modelling.

Competitors complained that several of the Myer parade clothes were ill-fitting, with one competition contestant telling Crikey although she is a size 14-16, she was given size 18 pants to wear. “You can see in half the photos that the clothes don’t fit properly and I’m not sure why Myer didn’t make more of the opportunity to showcase their clothes by having them fit the models properly.  Oversize clothes always make someone look bigger,” she said. One of the backstage crew on the parade apparently told the models “you girls should have worn what you came in with, you all looked gorgeous when you arrived”. You can check out photos from the parade here.

“The second that it was over, we were cleared out really fast. No email or anything … such a lack of appreciation”, said the model, who asked to remain anonymous. “I’m not sure if they [Myer] just thought ‘we’ll do token fat girl show’.”

Afterwards, despite the media backlash against whether these average-sized women were “healthy enough”, they received no support or follow-up from Myer. “I just did it for a bit of fun, I wasn’t expecting to be insulted. Maybe Myer could have prepared us for it,” Coyne told Crikey.

Not that the feedback was entirely negative. “People over size 12 love fashion too, but up until recently there hasn’t been much to love about fashion for them, as they haven’t been catered for, so it’s going to take time to build momentum and has to start somewhere,” noted the anonymous model contestant. “It’s a beginning and Myer should be applauded regardless.”

Despite numerous attempts to contact Myer, it didn’t respond to Crikey before deadline.

Peter Fray

Save 50% on a year of Crikey and The Atlantic.

The US election is in a little over a month. It seems that there’s a ridiculous twist in the story, almost every day.

Luckily for new Crikey subscribers, we’ve teamed up with one of America’s best publications, The Atlantic for the election race. Subscribe now to make sense of it all, and you’ll get a year of Crikey (usually $199) and a year’s digital subscription to The Atlantic (usually $70AUD), BOTH for just $129.

Peter Fray
Editor-in-chief of Crikey

JOIN NOW