Online

Aug 17, 2011

To Google, we are data fodder, and I am an unperson

Google's "real names" policy, apart from being a shameless push to upgrade the company's data mining capability and unbelievable boorish in execution, is nothing short of cultural imperialism.

Stilgherrian — Technology writer and broadcaster

Stilgherrian

Technology writer and broadcaster

Google’s “real names” policy, apart from being a shameless push to upgrade the company’s data mining capability and unbelievable boorish in execution, is nothing short of cultural imperialism. Yes, this is personal.

I knew I’d be caught sooner or later. Google insists that users of its new Google+ social network use “real” names. While I haven’t done anything with Google+ yet, I did reserve my Google profile just in case.

Free Trial

Proudly annoying those in power since 2000.

Sign up for a FREE 21-day trial to keep reading and get the best of Crikey straight to your inbox

By starting a free trial, you agree to accept Crikey’s terms and conditions

19 comments

Leave a comment

19 thoughts on “To Google, we are data fodder, and I am an unperson

  1. Stilgherrian

    @fozziewossie: Well, my anger was genuine. I feel like I should parse the difference between anger, fury, rage, outrage etc… but I was simply angry at how poor the process was.

    As for surprise, well, I’d figured Google had had enough time to at least fix the wording of the dialogs, iron out the people process a bit, even if there wasn’t time to reprogram things. I’d vaguely seen that people were having problems with the “real names” policy, but when I finally saw how poorly written it was, how inconsistent and just plain wrong… I was astounded that a global brand could be responsible for such a piece of shit.

    As Gumby Roffo says, this was an alpha or even pre-alpha mistake.

  2. Socratease

    Nothing that the Google mob does surprises me. Let’s see how Phuc Yew sits with their name police.

  3. green-orange

    I believe the system is based on Unix.

    Spaces and apostrophes are reserved character codes in Unix.
    They can be included in names, but then that might create problems with sub-application processes that use these character codes.

    Unix also recognises capitals, so capitals in the middle of a word will cause errors.

  4. Keith Kube

    This is not an ‘in beta’ problem. It is a deliberate design issue.

    Removing your access to other google products because they don’t like your public name, and insist that you use an ‘acceptable real life’ name in google plus goes well beyond ‘beta’ and into deliberate social engineering.

    I run a blog for a popular online game using “blogger” (a google product), with about 500 regular readers. I will not sign up to google+ because I put access to my blog, gmail, google docs and ‘reader’ at risk. Another blogger that did sign up to google+ lost access to her entire google account.

  5. Kevin Tyerman

    To redefine a lame old joke:

    Oh Really? No O’Reilly.

  6. Licia

    Yesterday W3C published an exhaustive article on name-related design issues, Personal names around the world (How do people’s names differ around the world, and what are the implications of those differences on the design of forms, databases, ontologies, etc. for the Web?). Wondering if it is a coincidence that it came out right now…

  7. Richard Cosgrove

    I hate to let facts get in the way of complaints, but…

    _’You can’t have spaces in a name. No “Anne Marie”. No “van Dyke”. No “John F Kennedy” either, he’d have to be just “John Kennedy”.
    Wrong – http://bit.ly/qPgJFZ, http://bit.ly/oL1xBm

    _’Therefore no suffixes such as “III” or “jnr”.’_
    Wrong: http://bit.ly/otrHC8

    _’No apostrophes, so there goes thriller writer and former army Brigadier Adrian D’Hage.’_
    Wrong: http://bit.ly/qdwmdU, http://bit.ly/pvwrcx

    _’Nothing that looks like two given names, such as “David Gordon”.’_
    Wrong: http://bit.ly/nah655, http://bit.ly/pMhQK4

  8. Stilgherrian

    @green-orange: You’re barking well up the wrong tree there. While various punctuation marks do have special meaning in operating systems like Unix and programming languages, as they do in English for that matter, you can still use them quite happily as part of the data manipulated by programs. Otherwise you’d never be able to use them in word processor documents or, indeed, in comments on this website — which runs on a Linux system, a species of Unix.

    @Keith Kube: The evidence seems to be that this Google Profiles / Google+ idiocy only affects some of those services. Kirrily Robert has a list. But yes, some of those you want to use are on the list.

  9. Miss Kai'

    I’ll see you and raise you. Not only do I have only one name [two syllables, four characters pronounced ‘kaigha’] but one of its four characters is an apostrophe. The full stop cure you spoke of doesn’t seem to work for me so my latest ploy has been to place my preferred salutation in the spot usually designated as being for the ‘first’ name as evidenced here by Crikey’s requirement for two names on registering.

Share this article with a friend

Just fill out the fields below and we'll send your friend a link to this article along with a message from you.

Your details

Your friend's details

Sending...