Aug 15, 2011

Simons: ABC News 24 runs on the smell of an oily rag

What is the true cost of ABC News 24, the ABC’s 24-hour television news service? It is a question that has preoccupied ABC watchers for more than a year since the service was launched.

Margaret Simons

Journalist, author and director of the Centre for Advanced Journalism

What is the true cost of ABC News 24, the ABC’s 24-hour television news service? It is a question that has preoccupied ABC watchers for more than a year since the service was launched. When the new channel was announced, ABC managing director Mark Scott was uncharacteristically cagey about how he had scraped together the money. He had, after all, failed to get the any more dough from government for the channel in the 2009 triennial funding round. Scott decided to go ahead in any case. At first he declined to say how much it cost, claiming that the money had been sourced from savings achieved through, among other things, the automation of studios. Since then he has given the figures of $20 million that was achieved in savings, with some, but not all, spent on ABC News 24. Now Aunty is gearing up for the next funding round in 2012. Since the service was launched, there have been persistent allegations from inside the ABC that resources are being diverted from other news-gathering activities to pay for the new channel. And other critics (including me) have complained that the channel is too slow to switch to breaking news. So what is the truth of the matter? Last year, using the YouCommNews audience drive commissioning site and contributions from donors I put in a freedom-of-information request asking for the real story. There was a convoluted response. As you can see on the YouCommNews blog posts, on one view the ABC doesn’t know how much the service costs, because Aunty’s accounting systems are not set up to count the dollars by platform or channel. As ABC FoI officer Judith Maude put it: "My understanding is that the actual costs of ABC News 24 are intermingled with other cost areas and it is not possible to isolate all of  the particular costs which could be attributed to ABC News 24." But eventually the ABC released not the actual cost  but rather the budgetary outlook that went to the ABC board on April 15  last year, and on the basis of which it gave ABC News 24 the go-ahead. The board was told that there would be one-off costs of $3.5 million to establish ABC News 24. This included designs and sets ($365,000), launch of special stories ($200,000) project management ($254,000) and contingency ($250,000). There were capital costs of $1.26 million for cameras, field kits and a server system, and an operations production cost of $560,000. Marketing and promotions absorbed a big $616,000 of the one-off costs. Ongoing operational costs were budgeted at $15.6 million. Of this, $9.6 million came from "ABC-wide operational efficiencies", according to the ABC. The rest included the existing amounts already budgeted for Breakfast News ($3.6 million) and the ABC’s continuous news centre ($2.4 million). So much for the budget. What about the actual costs? The past year has been an enormous drain on newsrooms all over the world,  but particularly in Australia with world disasters, local floods and that extraordinary federal election and its aftermath. The ABC’s figures make it impossible to separate out what providing news would have cost had ABC News 24 not existed. As  Maude puts it: "I have investigated the possibility of providing you with information based on a comparison of annual budgets/expenditure before and after the launch of ABC News 24. However, as you would expect, there are an enormous number of variables which affect the annual expenditure of the news division. Accordingly, comparing expenditure in 2008-09 with 2009-10 (i.e. after the launch ABC News 24) does not provide a meaningful measure of the costs of operating ABC News 24." The ABC nominated Alan Sunderland, head of policy for the news division, to field my questions on the figures. He was insistent "not one dollar" had been diverted from other news services to pay for ABC News 24. The $15.6 million figure, he said, was not the real cost of establishing a news channel. Rather it was the additional cost of a new platform that made use of all the existing resources and coverage. Sunderland agreed that the news budget had been under strain. He also agreed that ABC News 24 had used far more live-to-air coverage than had originally been planned. But he painted a cheery picture of reporters happy to do the extra live crosses because it was good for their profile. News conferences and the like could be live streamed for little or no extra dollar cost, he said. So what conclusions can we draw? The figures released confirm ABC News 24 is a smell-of-an-oily-rag operation. And despite the assurances, nobody can really be sure about the impact the demands of a 24-hour service has had on the depth and quality of news gathering. It seems likely that the biggest impact is in human cost, the pressure on reporters to provide content for more for more platforms. For any broadcaster, this is an opportunity and a burden. Now the question must be whether in the next triennial funding round, the ABC’s adventurism in establishing the service with so little cash will be rewarded, or not. And if anyone from inside the ABC or elsewhere has more information, I am interested. Note: YouCommNews is an audience-driven commissioning website run by the Foundation for Public Interest Journalism at Swinburne University. I am the chair of the foundation. Given that Crikey has published this story, the donations received to fund it will be, with the donors’ consent, redirected to other pitches on YouCommNews.

Free Trial

You've hit members-only content.

Sign up for a FREE 21-day trial to keep reading and get the best of Crikey straight to your inbox

By starting a free trial, you agree to accept Crikey’s terms and conditions


Leave a comment

16 thoughts on “Simons: ABC News 24 runs on the smell of an oily rag

  1. Mike Jones

    Margaret, I strongly suspect that your title is not syntactically correct.

    When you said ” ABC News 24 runs on the smell of an oily rag”, I felt that the meaning would have been more pungent if you had said “ABC News 24 smells like and oily rag on the run”.

    Hope this helps.

  2. Gavin Moodie

    I understand how the ABC might not budget or account for expenditure by platform or channel. However, it should. It is similar to hospitals introducing casemix funding and universities knowing how much each program and graduate costs. While it may not reflect the organisation’s internal operations it is basic information for internal control as well as external accountability.

  3. Joceyln Tan

    The most obvious fact in this data is that the ABC planned to fail. The fixed cost increment says that no new capacity was put in place, which means that the whole plan assumes that existing infrastructure is adequate. The operating cost budget is plainly just enough to turn on the lights in the barely tarted-up studio(s) and nothing like what it costs to go LIVE to major events such as Pakistan floods, Christchurch earthquakes, Afghan terrorist bombings, London riots, Horn of Africa famines, Washington, Athens, Rome, etc debt dramas and so on.
    If Mr Scott did not intend to make LIVE TV, why oh why is he spending a dollar on ABC News 24?????

  4. Suzanne Blake

    ABC News 24 is extremely left wing. They just rabbit on the ALP and Green line

  5. David Hand

    ABC News 24 is my primary source of televised news and information.

  6. Suzanne Blake

    @ David Hand

    Do you like being 2 – 8 hours behind!!!

  7. Pamela

    ABC NEWS RADIO – YES – DO-ABLE and vital
    but watching re run clips on ABC tv News- urrrgh
    What about putting the money into some entertaining exciting drama
    Some of us need distraction – our own lives and too tied up with the news
    My two bobs worth

  8. David Hand

    News 24 covers all the stories in a timely way as far as I’m concerned although their ability to gear up for a big, breaking news story is clearly not there. But I did get to see someone throw a cream pie at Rupert Murdoch live on News 24…..
    The fluff on commercial TV is just rubbish, celebrity gossip and cross promotions for other TV programmes.
    Virginia Trioli is my favourite TV journo.
    Sky? They’d be second.

  9. Suzanne Blake

    @ Peter Hand

    I agree Virginia is good. But News 24 is too much old news. Recall they were rubbished for being 5 hours late on the Bomb Hoax a few weeks ago. All they had was a news ticker, nothing live until 7 hours after the event started at 2.20pm

  10. Hugh (Charlie) McColl

    Seven hours later than the others reporting a hoax bomb. Er, priorities Suzanne. Doubtless numerous other hoaxes weren’t reported at all.

Share this article with a friend

Just fill out the fields below and we'll send your friend a link to this article along with a message from you.

Your details

Your friend's details