Early this year, I did something I had always sworn I’d never do. On a quiet, late-night hour I set foot in IKEA, wandered its furnished labyrinth and behemoth aisles, and came away with four Billy bookcases, which my boyfriend and I spent the next day assembling and loading with the books that were overflowing from our other, less-disposable shelving.
IKEA. Now there’s a company that understands price-points, starting with the price range it believes consumers will pay for its items and then working its way backwards to create objects at those prices. As we stood before the rows of bookshelves, I noticed several signs informing customers that, due to IKEA’s buying power and recent negotiations with suppliers, the price of Billy bookcases had actually come down in the past year.
Later, we passed full-sized kitchen clocks priced at three dollars. Back at home, once we’d negotiated the Allen keys and drilled in a couple of holes the IKEA-bots had missed, we filled our entire wall with bookshelves for $300. This was the global economy at work, and I was a part of it.
The Book Depository is the global economy at work, too. Don’t get me wrong: I’m not comparing half-baked furniture with books. The similarity lies in the fact that they are both rational outcomes of a global market in which price is the defining consideration. Like IKEA, The Book Depository is incredibly efficient and, like IKEA, it is particularly efficient in terms of price — thanks, in large part, to the power of scale (The Book Depository’s managing director Kieron Smith said in 2009 that his company is “a volume-led business, and we can get very good deals with couriers as we are shipping upwards of 130,000 products per week”).
The difference is that while I’ll occasionally put up with the many things I don’t like about IKEA in order to get my furniture cheap, The Book Depository and its Amazonian siblings don’t get any of my business. Why? I care more about books than about the furniture they are stacked on.
Obviously, I have a vested interest in my consumer dollars going to local bookshops – I edit a trade journal for the Australian book industry. Without that industry, there will be no magazine. But my interest in this issue extends far beyond ensuring my next pay cheque. My job has given me an awareness of the chain of production for books that I otherwise wouldn’t have had. It’s this understanding of the trade as it currently stands — and what’s in it for me — that influences where I buy books. In this sense, I see my decision to purchase books in good local bookshops, as opposed to online UK megastores, as a self-interested one. I like those shops and the local publishers they support, and I want them to stick around.
So what do I think I’m paying for when I buy my books locally? Well, taking my bookshop of choice, Readings, I’m paying for online and in-person recommendations and reviews; the physical space the store provides to meet and browse with friends, discussing books or the ideas they provoke; an undeniable sense of community which extends beyond the realm of the book; the very act of collation that highlights books I am interested in among the thousands more around; and — through the Readings Foundation — financial support for an adult literacy program at Melbourne’s Western Suburbs Indigenous Gathering Place, educational scholarships for disadvantaged students, a tutoring program for children of migrant families from Sudan, a regional programming stream at the Emerging Writers’ Festival and several Victorian Writers’ Centre residencies (which I like thinking I might experience one day), as well as many other great projects.
My interstate ‘locals’ include the hive of literary activity that is Avid Reader in Brisbane (a bookshop that has produced several authors from its ranks of staff, all of whom have their literary ears to the ground on readers’ behalf), the beautiful Riverbend Books across the way in Bulimba, whose owner Suzy Wilson founded the Indigenous Literacy Project and hosts wonderful author events on the store’s huge deck; Gleebooks in Sydney, which fosters a sense of community around reading — where the launch of a Harry Potter book, for example, might be cause for a special steam-train ride and picnic for young fans (and where owner David Gaunt’s contribution to his community was recently recognised when he was made a member of the Order of Australia).
At these and other great bookshops around the country I encounter engaged staff, author events — and in some cases, whole writers’ festivals and book fairs (not to mention the best cards and gift-wrapping going). And that’s in addition to the books themselves.
When it comes to the books, I know my dollars are also serving me in the long term: when I buy from my local bookseller — whether the book I am buying is Australian or not — part of that money is almost always going to a local publisher. They, in turn, are ensuring both that fantastic overseas titles continue to be brought to my attention (such as Every Man in this Village is a Liar, whose author Megan Stack visited Australia for last year’s Byron Bay Writers’ Festival thanks to her Australian publisher), and that books of social and cultural import, like local writer Chloe Hooper’s The Tall Man, continue to be published.
The importance of local booksellers to small, independent publishers was demonstrated recently when the Small Press Underground Networking Community (SPUNC) worked in partnership with a local retailer (Readings) to make its members’ ebooks available to consumers. At a time when small presses are increasingly branching out in promotional strategies, reaching niche audiences through social networks — as so many pundits suggest publishers will need to do in the future — the continued necessity of bricks-and-mortar booksellers is evident in this decision to partner with Readings on their ebook venture.
I’m not saying that some of the benefits provided by Australian bookshops mentioned above are not available online from overseas; I’m saying that, given how much I value them in their current form, and given the broader gains I see along the chain of production, I choose to factor these benefits into my purchasing decisions. And I suspect many who feel the way I do about their local bookshop and local publishers might choose to shop locally rather than on overseas websites if they had the chance to ponder some of the implications of their decisions.
Like looking for local produce at the supermarket or choosing locally-designed and made clothing, I’m shopping for my books with an awareness of the bigger picture. The phrase ‘ethical consumption’ surfaces with regard to a range of other goods, and in the simplest sense it should apply here. I’m not talking about human rights, animal rights, the ethics of life-and-death, but that very simple, individual question of whether my book-buying habits are compatible with my broader life values. Whether my decisions and actions are contributing to the kind of world I’d like to create — or to something else entirely.
To me, the assumption that so long as prices are getting lower the consumer must be benefiting is a pretty naive one. Something that is often assumed when modelling economic behaviour is that an individual has ‘perfect information’ on the outcomes of their purchasing decision. While few would argue anyone can ever have truly perfect knowledge of such outcomes, it doesn’t hurt to try to add to the data.
In the United States (where the number of independent bricks-and-mortar booksellers has reportedly dropped from around 6000 in the 1990s to just over 2000 at present), remaining booksellers have a whole campaign built around this — it’s called IndieBound, a movement that identifies local independent shops (booksellers or otherwise) and thanks customers for shopping in them, using a number of mediums to highlight the wider benefits of their purchasing decisions.
Indiebound was officially launched in Australia at the Australian Booksellers Association conference over the weekend.
Some will try to tell you that it’s impossible for Australia’s book industry to do any better on prices. It’s not true. There are aspects of the local and international book industries that are incredibly inefficient — the supply chain for non-Australian titles being one example. Too often, local publishers or distributors hold exclusive rights to overseas-generated titles but do not hold stock, preferring to import from overseas. As these publishers wait to receive enough local orders to fill a pallet (and thus save on freight), local orders from booksellers can take weeks to fulfil. Such inefficiencies present a complex challenge, but not an insurmountable one.
When the government announced in 2009, following a report from the Productivity Commission, that it wasn’t going to change Australia’s laws regarding the parallel importation of books (that is, it would uphold the status quo which says a bookseller cannot import a title if there is a local supplier for that book) it made its stance clear: “If books cannot be made available in a timely fashion and at a competitive price, customers will opt for online sales and ebooks.” Put simply: the government didn’t need to change legislation to ensure competition, ebooks and the web were already doing that for them.
Last Christmas, almost half of Australian booksellers my publication surveyed reported sales had dropped compared to the same time the previous year. Many of them also reported customers in-store talking to each other about The Book Depository, or seeing browsers take photographs of the books and their ISBNs — in order, presumably, to go and buy them elsewhere online. And while some in the industry blame the group’s woes on poor management, there’s no denying that REDgroup Retail’s demise has highlighted some of the pressures facing all local booksellers.
Certainly, publishers and booksellers will have to lift their game. Any bookshop without an online sales facility and an excellent online search function is condemning themselves to oblivion; those bricks-and-mortar shops that do provide online sales report increases in that area year after year, while exclusively online booksellers here (who, by definition, funnel all their efforts into online business) are reporting exponential growth — with sales up 800 per cent, in one case. Shops that have survived without knowledgeable, egalitarian and friendly customer service (and yes, some have) won’t for much longer.
Booksellers who have entered the game because they romanticised a life surrounded by books and eschew necessary business management considerations will go, if they haven’t already; the rest will need to focus on their points-of-difference in a way they never have before. These stores will also have to get better at thanking their customers. If a result of community discussion of this topic is that a customer makes the decision to buy local, they should be genuinely and regularly thanked for it at every point in the transaction, whether it’s in-store or online (as IndieBound encourages US bookshops to do).
Publishers, on the other hand, face the enormous challenge of shifting a century-old and rapidly outmoded business model while simultaneously trying to stay afloat — not unlike attempting to steer a slow-moving ship around an iceberg. They will be mixing print-on-demand and short-run printing into a business model that was built around the initial multiple-thousand-copy print run necessitated by traditional print technology.
The supply-chain earthquake that ebooks will cause aside, the tide of consumers who don’t care if their bookshop disappears, replaced by an IKEA-sized book factory on the other side of the world, will be enough to force the local industry to change. So have no fear: the book industry will adjust itself. At the same time, those of us who care about more than price should buy with our eyes open, knowing that with our purchases we are also, in part, choosing the kind of local bookish community that is left at the end of that process.
Inevitably, there will be winners and losers. Because even though the industry as a whole will become more efficient, not all the factors cited by the local book trade as reasons for Australia’s prices can be solved. The issue of basic wages, the challenges posed by a small population, the high cost of retail and office space: these factors won’t disappear. Which means, if price is genuinely all we care about, most of our bookshops will.
Instead of subscribing to a position that says price will be the only deciding factor in who wins, I’d like to recognise that I have a role to play in choosing who I’d like the winners to be. I would like to be one of them. I would win by getting to keep my local bookstore, which brings me much happiness, great local publishing and, ultimately, economic benefit. I would like the losers to be the Ikeas of the bookselling world, the ones that offer nothing above and beyond price and convenience. And so I shop accordingly. When it comes to books, anyway.
When I was a toddler my father was a carpenter, making furniture on commission. I remember playing in the wood shavings of the converted stable in Flemington that he used as a workshop. The other day he visited our home, and when he saw our new shelves he stood, momentarily, in that kind of reverie people experience when some part of their former life returns unbidden, like a curious surprise. He ran his hands along the melamine, and began telling us how he used to measure up spaces like our wall, built shelves like our shelves – though out of actual wood and with none of those little IKEA holes.
With his big carpenter hands resting on one of the shelves, he calculated what something like this bookcase would have cost to make back then. Of course, he said, even then he never really made any money, because things had already begun to change. Today, even if we had asked my father to make those exact crappy shelves for us without charging for labour, he wouldn’t have been able to beat IKEA’s price. Such is the bulk-buying power available in the contemporary global market.
One day, the continuing growth in ebooks suggests, I may well choose to have most of my library on my computer rather than my wall. Recommendations and reviews and conversation about books might have moved entirely online, along with most of the books themselves. If that happens, I’ll be considering a whole new set of values and factors in making my book-purchasing decisions. But for now, I’ll continue to spend my money on the thing I value most — which is having wonderful bookshops here in my small part of a very big world.
Matthia Dempsey is a writer, reviewer and editor-in-chief of Bookseller+Publisher magazine.
This is an extract of ‘Meaning-of-life Type Stuff: The Survival of Australian Bookshops‘, which appears in Issue Five of Kill Your Darlings. Purchase the issue here.
36 thoughts on “Death of the bookshop: what you pay for when you buy local”
Shane Nixon
July 28, 2011 at 10:39 amI have a vested interest in not been gouged at the checkout and that is why I buy books from on-line retailers.
IF the book is a locally published Australian publisher and Australian author I will go out of my way to purchase locally. I will even buy foreign authors published by some of the local indie publishers. I will not buy, for example, a locally published Stephen King just because the publisher is big enough to do a local print run too. It will cost 20% to 100% more than importing anyway.
RamaStar
July 28, 2011 at 11:31 am@Shane Nixon
Maybe, but as put in article, it’s those print runs of overseas books that allows Australian publishers to invest in and publish Austrailan authors who’s sales won’t cover the expense of publishing them. For example, without doing print runs of Lord Archer, publishers wouldn’t have the money to gamble on Matthew Riley.
Captain Planet
July 28, 2011 at 11:48 amAppealing to the buyer’s altruism to encourage the buyer to spend considerably more money on a local product is a highly unreliable business plan.
Purchasers have an extremely poor track record of opting for local products at a higher price than imported products, even when the quality of the local product is significantly better than that of the imported product. To suggest that a local industry which produces a poorer quality product at a higher price than imported alternatives, can be saved by well – meaning purchasers being willing to voluntarily pay a premium price for a crap product, in order to nostalgically prop up a blatantly uncompetitive local industry, is a serious exercise in wishful thinking.
freecountry
July 28, 2011 at 12:11 pmRamastar – Maybe, but they do so by using the parallel import law to handicap the overseas competition.
Overseas publishers have to wait until 30 days after a book has been published elsewhere before they even know if any Australian publisher will exercise its local cartel option. Of course, Australian publishers don’t inform the overseas rights holder whether they’re interested, they just wait for it to expire. Until that happens, the overseas publisher can’t risk all the advance logistics and marketing to prepare for an Australian release. It will be months before the book can appear in Australian bookshops, and by then the moment has passed, the book reviews are forgotten and the literary world has moved on, and there’s little point in the book appearing here at all. Especially when shoppers can go online and avoid the local publishing cartel pricing, as well as GST, local marketing expenses, and the risk premium of shipping an exotic title to Australia.
Protectionists always have someone to hold hostage in the public eye to justify kneecapping their overseas competitors in this way. According to Australian publishers, local authors and local culture will be ruined if they are no longer able to us the parallel import rule to limit our reading choices in this way. Our government seems to think that’s a small price to pay.
freecountry
July 28, 2011 at 12:19 pmhttp://www.alia.org.au/advocacy/copyright/your.ques.answered.html
Shane Nixon
July 28, 2011 at 1:12 pmEbooks are another example of the cartel at work. Anybody wonder why the take up of eBooks is so low in Australia? Because half the titles on Kindle, for example, aren’t available to Australians. A little while ago I tried to get an eBook version of a best selling Australian author. The Kindle version was about 7.99 but it wasn’t available to Australians. I finally managed to wade deep into the Australian publishers website to find an E version available that was about the same price as trade paperback or the hardcover. Now why would I jump through hoops to pay an extortionate amount for something that is available elsewhere for 1/4 the price?
Something is rotten in the Australian (big) publishing industry. I don’t have a problem with Aussie small press, and as I mentioned earlier, I go out of my way to buy direct from them.
And really? As a consumer I should have the honour of paying 2, 3, 4 or 5 times as much just so the Aussie publisher can find and make millions off the the next Matthew Riley? Maybe the publishers should apply for charity status so we can get a tax deduction book purchases.
Then there is the publisher’s lament at just how tiny the Australian market is. Apparently we turn over about 30% of what the UK does – about AU$1.4 billion in 2010 (UK was about AU$4.4 billion). That doesn’t suggest as tiny a market as what we’re lead to believe.
RamaStar
July 28, 2011 at 2:13 pmFreecountry.
Your premise rest on the fact that retailers will drop their prices for books imported from overseas. Book retailers may import cheaper books yet not pass on the savings to the consumer and take more profit from themselves. Considering that on firm sale from publishers, retailers get up to 50% of RRP anyway and don
RamaStar
July 28, 2011 at 2:13 pmMy post seemed to get cut off
Considering that on firm sale from publishers, retailers get up to 50% of RRP anyway and don’t pass that onto consumers, there is no evidence to suggest that lifting the rights will improve the cost of books. Also considering the coalition pushing for the lift of the important rights is made up of major chain retailers (Woolworths et. al), they’ll use the lift to fatten their profit margins at the expense of local publishers and local authors.
Again
“assumption that so long as prices are getting lower the consumer must be benefiting is a pretty naive one.” Market efficiency comes from asymmetric information, not from the cheapest price. An market that is the cheapest can still be an inefficient market.
Also, where is this notion that Publisher are gluttonous and making ‘millions’ off consumer bucks. Publisher profits (if the make profit) are paper thin. Many publishers, including Penguin, & Harper Collins have been laying off staff and implement hiring freezes. It’s amazing this ‘publishers are the problem’ attitude. Yes they need to evolve, and charging eBook version at trade paperback price is ridiculous, but the state of the industry is hardly because of millionaire publishers kicking back in swimming pools of your hard earned. (and no I don’t work for a publisher, or even in the industry, I just take note of all the information)
freecountry
July 28, 2011 at 4:00 pmRamastar – How much mark-up business people charge on goods is a function of various things, including how much competition they face. It’s got nothing to do with whether they go to church, have haloes around their heads, or vote for progressive parties. If a business has to choose between dropping its prices or being undercut, it will drop prices if it can afford to do so.
If you read the Australian Library and Information Association link I posted above, they draw on the Productivity Commission report to explain why the parallel import law results mainly in overcharging Australian consumers for books. That’s less choice, for higher prices, and most of the excess prices go to foreign publishers anyway. The PC report explains this in detail, but essentially we’re ripped off by legislative barriers to entry, giving us less competition, less choice, and higher prices.
By the way, ALIA is not in the book selling business; it is made up of librarians, who are book buyers, who want more choice for less price like the rest of us. It’s worth having a read of what they say and what the PC said.
Smithee
July 28, 2011 at 10:12 pmThe main thing Matthia Dempsey needs is a good sub-editor. Twice as much has been said in half as many words. And I suppose she does own a computer? The old cliche about “personal serice and reviews” is bollocks: you get much better reviews and in-depth discussions on any number of interantional forums.
She’s closest to the mark when she says she has a vested interest in the industry. Well stuff ’em I say. They’ve gouged us for years and now it’s too late to make friends. I buy all my books overseas and couldn’t be happier.
Unlike the author of this piece, I buy books for the actual book, not all the social palaver and worthy causes that are tacked on like toys-in-the-cereal-box.