Jul 25, 2011

Into the abyss of the Norway massacre

The Oslo massacre was turning out to be an abyss, the sadistic mass murder of the young -- but there its resemblance to a high school massacre ended.

Guy Rundle — Correspondent-at-large

Guy Rundle


When police are caught off guard by a massacre, it is usually for good reasons — the society is so unused to them that there is no contingency plan, no automatic reaction. Thus, it took Oslo’s SWAT team more than an hour to get to Utoeya island where Anders Behring Breivik was allegedly slaughtering teenagers attending a Social Democratic/Labour party youth camp; they had no helicopter at their disposal; indeed, it took them 20  minutes to find a boat.

The global right-wing commentariat were not so slow off the mark. Barely had the news of a bombing and a massacre hit the wires, than they responded with due caution, diligence, and seriousness — by blaming Muslims. Though they had absolutely nothing to go on, and though the mass-shooting profile did not fit the model of European Islamist terror in the slightest, the theme was irresistible to them — peaceful country in leftish Scandinavia, largely staying out of Western military adventures, hit equally by the “global war”, etc, etc. How could it not be?

Free Trial

Proudly annoying those in power since 2000.

Sign up for a FREE 21-day trial to keep reading and get the best of Crikey straight to your inbox

By starting a free trial, you agree to accept Crikey’s terms and conditions


Leave a comment

54 thoughts on “Into the abyss of the Norway massacre

  1. pk_x

    So many right-wingers were perfectly happy to condemn the association that was made between Loughner and Sarah Palin’s violent rhetoric and militaristic slogans. And yet they jump at the chance to condemn Islamic terrorism when it’s completely untrue.

    Andrew Bolt, ‘Loughner and the Rorschach reporting of the Left’:
    “It also shows how easily media reporting of events like this can be nothing more than the response to a Rorschach test, with journalists imposing on an event a narrative shaped by their prejudices and not by any evidence. ”
    It’s a pity he didn’t heed his own sanctimonious advice.

  2. nuytsia

    Mostly a good commentary Guy, although I think that an initial assumption that the attack was Islamist on the basis that an Islamist group had claimed responsibility, is probably reasonable. If journalists were not free to make that sort of interim assumption, we would never receive any news until a full police investigation and court hearing. The error was in not immediately and fully correcting the reasonable but wrong assumption as soon as the facts became clear.

  3. Allison

    “meanwhile, it is highly possible that Breivik will be no isolated author of atrocity, but the start of a new period in which terror once more comes from the Right”… how utterly chilling a thought. Please no.

  4. Ben Aveling

    According to Europol, there were 249 terrorist attacks in Europe in 2010, of which Muslims launched three.

    Source:, Section 4.1

  5. Pamela

    Surely time our own aussie crazies were reigned in. This constant drum beat – Labor government only one death from falling rhetoric etc etc is unhelpful in keeping the lid on the right wingnuts.
    A reading of blog responses to refugee and asylum seekers issues is positively frightening.
    Do we really share this country with people wanting to Shoot/Drown/slaughter human beings arriving by boat?
    Time our politrical leaders pulled their heads in and close their loose lips.
    This is not censorship – it is common sense and good manners not to engage in hatemongering.

  6. mikeb

    First thought (I must confess) was that it was islamic terrorism but, as in the case of Port Arthur, the truth is much more difficult to understand. Just waiting now for the conspiracy theories to come out as happened after Port Arthur, 9/11, etc etc.

  7. Delerious

    I woke up in the morning reading the ABC and knowing that 2 bombs had exploded and a man was shooting on an island but, thank god for ABC, no suppusitions on who was responsible. Even then I guessed it was an US style home-grown terrorist but I was willing to wait to hear more. Then they started saying he was a right wing Christian conservative. Well there you go.

  8. Liz45

    @NUYTSUA – What is wrong with a ‘journalist'(I use that term advisedly, as Bolt is certainly not one) stating, that we do not know what was/is behind the attacks/murderers/assaults/bombings etc? Better that then shooting their mouth off, only to look like fools!

  9. klewso

    Anyone here tried reading “political correspondent Blott’s” political correspondence with a copy of the Limited News “Professional Conduct Policy” open nearby? To get some sort of grasp of his (and those that employ him), real “regard” for such “piffle” – beyond the empty motherhood rhetoric?
    Like Howard’s “Ministerial Code of Conduct”.

  10. JoolianP

    Guy, you are spot on.

    Not only in the mainstream media but also on social media there was instant blame of Muslims.

    And even now, the media is having a hard time calling him a “Christian Fundamentalist” when “Muslim Fundamentalist” trips so easily off their tongues.

    Weirdly the ABC yesterday ran an item “Should violent video games be banned in Australia because of what happened in Norway?” Hmmmm… maybe but what about Christians or guns first?

    This isn’t the start of anything, Timothy McFjord or whatever his name, is just a mentalist. His mentalist ideas will be as interesting and worthy of discussion as a blocked toilet.

Leave a comment

Share this article with a friend

Just fill out the fields below and we'll send your friend a link to this article along with a message from you.

Your details

Your friend's details