PM should take the next step

Her Green allies might not like it but Julia Gillard should take the next step in letting the people give their verdict on her carbon tax regime.

Richard Farmer

Crikey political commentator

Take the next step. Her Green allies might not like it but Julia Gillard should take the next step in letting the people give their verdict on her carbon tax regime. At last night’s community forum she started down the path that might blunt the anger people have that she broke her election promise not to introduce such a tax. She argued that judgment on the carbon tax should be reserved until the 2013 election, by when people would have had a ”lived experience” of the new regime. The necessary next step is to promise that Labor would accept the electoral judgment and not attempt to block in the Senate any attempt, should there be a Coalition Liberal-National government elected, to repeal Labor’s legislation.

The Greens, who already are relishing their balance of power position, would not like that prospect much for it would make them irrelevant again but it would allow the Prime Minister to argue that allowing people a real test drive of a policy was even fairer than giving them the chance to judge it in a pre-election campaign brochure.

Free Trial

Proudly annoying those in power since 2000.

Sign up for a FREE 21-day trial to keep reading and get the best of Crikey straight to your inbox

By starting a free trial, you agree to accept Crikey’s terms and conditions


Leave a comment

5 thoughts on “PM should take the next step

  1. Gavin Moodie

    Yes, Turnbull’s performance was excruciating. It would have been better for the Coalition had he said simply that he was going to vote against the Bill, if that is indeed his plan.

  2. Daniel Bond

    Brilliant! Of course the democratic thing for the ALP to do would be to ignore the will of the constituents that voted of it in the seats it won, and support the policy of another party because it won more seats in the house! The democratic thing to do is to make the house of propotional representation subservient to the house where a party with 12% of the vote has one seat and a party with 3% of the vote has six!

    If the Libs voted in favour of the repeal of WorkChoices after the 2007 election, I sure as hell don’t remember it.

  3. Gavin Moodie

    @ Daniel

    I agree. Furthermore, the next election may be decided on several issues of which by then the carbon tax may be only minor.

  4. Meski

    With Abbott being his usual obstructionist self, why the h*ll would Labor do this, or agree to it? It the voters dislike it that much, then they have an opportunity to give Abbott control in the upper house. But that wouldn’t be wise.

  5. Ray Quigley

    Simple idea.

    An election asking only 2 questions.

    1. Do you believe in “Global Warming” = Carbon Tax.

    2. I don’t believe in “Global Warming”= Carbon Sequestriation.

    Maybe if you were going to vote for 2. then the question of why the proponents of that argument need any “remedy”?

Share this article with a friend

Just fill out the fields below and we'll send your friend a link to this article along with a message from you.

Your details

Your friend's details