A plume of radioactive particles extending into the stratosphere from the Fukushima Daiichi reactor complex makes a mockery of claims that Japan’s nuclear crisis isn’t comparable to the Chernobyl disaster in 1986.
The stream of nuclear contaminants are being driven by an intense heat source consistent with exposed fuel rods burning in air, the process that inevitably leads to meltdown unless massive and prompt intervention is successful.
These radioactive clouds are now mixing with higher altitude air currents and being dispersed more widely across northern Asia and the north Pacific.
They are being tracked by the international Volcanic Ash Advisory Centre in London, which is authorised by the International Atomic Energy Agency to alert airlines and airports to accidental releases of nuclear contamination.
The VAAC this morning issued 10 nuclear emergency flight information regional advisories (FIRs) to enable airlines to route flights well clear of the hazard along air corridors across northern Asia, southern China including Hong Kong, all of Japan and Korea and the high latitude or sub-polar routes that are used to connect North America to dozens of Asia-Pacific cities.
Qantas either has or will soon re-route its Narita flights to achieve a minimum time turnaround at the main Tokyo airport and return via Hong Kong, where there will be a crew change.
This change will avoid overnight stops by crews in Japan for occupational health and logistical reasons, but the airline is closely monitoring the changing situation and all travellers (and on all airlines) are advised to check for late changes to the northern Asia flights.
There is a line of six nuclear reactors at the Fukushima plant, four of which have now experienced one or more large explosions with the remaining two that had been taken off line before the earthquake and tsunami of last Friday now heating up to levels so dangerous Tokyo Electric is considering breaking down the reactor block walls to allow a build-up of hydrogen gas to escape.
Exasperation with the quality of information coming out of the Japanese nuclear authority, the government and the Tokyo Electric company led to harsh words from the French nuclear authority this morning.
It said the Daiichi accident could be classed as a level 6 event on the scale of one to 7. The Chernobyl calamity in 1986 began as a level 6 event and was then elevated to level 7, which until now consist of the only level 6 and level 7 events recorded.
An official was quoted as saying “Tokyo has all but lost control over the situation”.
This morning the Japan nuclear authority insisted that level 4, an event with purely local effects, was the appropriate level, which is clearly not what the normally ultra-tactful International Atomic Energy Agency thought when it directed the VAAC to issue the warnings to airlines, and also to the airports at which any aircraft exposed to radiation must be thoroughly decontaminated under international conventions.
The major European and China flag carriers have variously cancelled services to Japan or re-routed flights to ensure that flight crew do not overnight in Tokyo, similar to the action that Qantas is about to take.
The quality of information from the Japanese has descended into farce, with simultaneous claims that radiation levels are harmful in the Chernobyl-sized exclusion zone but did not constitute a threat to health. This follows the patently dishonest misuse of radiation exposure metrics used for the first 3½ days of the crisis, which understated the real levels by 1000 or three orders of magnitude.
The US think tank, the Institute for Science and International Security, said the situation at Daiichi had worsened considerably and was now closer to a level 6 event and “may unfortunately reach a level 7”.

231 thoughts on “Japan’s nuclear farce”
twobob
March 16, 2011 at 3:35 pmDANR
You assume much and are wrong, I bought shares in geothermal power and I expect long term I will do v.well indeed!
gregb
March 16, 2011 at 3:40 pmdanr: “Wickipedia gives Liquid density of U238 at m.p. 17.3 g·cm−3 which means that the molten amalgamated core, being denser than the earths surface (approx 2.9) will sink into the crust.
The hole thus drilled will need to be capped quickly to avoid molten magma and dangerous gases, such as carbon dioxide, from the Earths core spouting all over the Japanese coast.”
Please, please, please tell me that you’re trying to be funny….
lindsayb
March 16, 2011 at 3:40 pm@Damien
Good luck with that. I hope for your sake that your regulator has fearless and thorough auditors, and that your judicial system is tough enough to persue criminal actions agains corporate criminals.
danr
March 16, 2011 at 3:40 pmcongratulations. I hope you do OK.
twobob
March 16, 2011 at 3:41 pmThere is a slow motion disaster occurring here with one definite causality.
Public trust in the nuclear sector is dead and buried and cremated! Dead and buried and cremated I tell ya, right where it belongs too.
Bob the builder
March 16, 2011 at 3:47 pmNuclear power is safe and cost-effective.
Climate change is a conspiracy by a tiny minority of scientists.
The earth is flat.
Frank Campbell
March 16, 2011 at 3:51 pmQuite a different view from that pumped out by the BBC etc in the last few days. Not to mention the string of “experts” who have played down the “incident”. Barry Brooks for instance, the local nukeflak.
One thing anyone can see- the info from the Japanese govt/nuclear industry has been confused, opaque and contradictory. The locals are well aware of the cover-ups and lying which has characterised the Japanese nuclear lobby for decades…which is why the “stoic” Japanese are so worried. They know their own political pondlife all too well.
Broinowksi said as much a couple of days ago.
One good thing might come out of it- squash the Oz nukeboys, who’ve crawled out of their concrete sarcophagi to save us from global warming. Back in your box, Barry.
Better say it again: stop arseing about with nuclear, “carbon taxes”, PV roof panels and wind and get on with basic renewables R and D.
danr
March 16, 2011 at 3:51 pmThere are fields in the good old US of A where there are upwards of 14,000 wind turbines.
They stopped working. Can’t afford to repair them, won’t pull them down, certainly not going to replace them.
A blot on the desert landscape.
A taxpayer funded green white elephant.
Jim Reiher
March 16, 2011 at 3:53 pmshooba – “almost zero probability” is not good enough to do it. In any danger analysis you ask two main questions:
– how likely is it to happen?
– what impact will it have?
If the first answer is “almost zero” but the second answer is catastrophic, then we still would not do the action.
It just is not worth the 1 in 10,000 – or whatever, risk.
Jim Reiher
March 16, 2011 at 3:58 pmDan R tell me more about the fields of irrepariable wind turbines….
– is it a true story or an urban myth put out by the mining companies?
– is it partly true (numbers a lot less, the decision was political to not repair them, to pamper for the fossil fuel companies interests – like decisions to kill solar projects under George W)?
– you are just making it up off the top of your head?