Today Crikey kicks off a special investigation into how fast food marketers use sport and sporting stars to sell their wares. And we start with the Big Daddy of them all, McDonald’s, which launched a huge TV campaign with Shane Warne this summer.
For more stories and profiles, visit the Just Chew It landing page. Profiled brands include KFC, Milo, McDonald’s and Coca-Cola.
Last month a survey of 12,000 Australian secondary school children revealed that one in four Aussie kids is overweight or obese, with numbers more than doubling over the last 25 years. According to Professor Ian Olver of the Cancer Council Australia, we are now facing a “chronic disease time bomb”, which could see today’s teenagers dying younger than their parents.
The same survey showed more than half these 12,000 children had tried a food or drink because they had seen it advertised, while roughly a fifth had bought a food or drink because it was endorsed by a sports star or celebrity.
And we’re talking about junk food here, because that’s where the biggest food companies like McDonald’s, Coca Cola, Nestle and Yum Brands spend their massive advertising budgets.
Another recent survey showed parents are just as easily persuaded by ads and celebrity endorsements, being twice as likely to buy junk (and think it healthy) if a sports star — like Shane Warne or Tim Cahill — is smiling out from the packet or the TV screen.
Yet more and more sports and stars are taking money to promote unhealthy food. Crikey’s investigation has shown that just about every junk food brand in Australia now uses sporting celebrities and sport to sell its wares. And just about every sport is taking millions of dollars to promote foods that many athletes would never touch.
Last February, the US food giant Mars agreed to pay $1 million a year to the Carlton Football Club to get its logo on Carlton’s jerseys. The deal was advertised with pictures of the team holding up Mars bars, something they would surely not normally eat.
Over in Western Australia, the burger chain Hungry Jacks is also now paying $1 million a year to get its name on West Coast Eagles shirts. The deal gives it prominent signage at the ground, which is beamed to TV audiences across Australia.
And as we all know, Shane Warne has recently struck it rich — as the new face of the huge McDonald’s marketing campaign that was all over Nine’s summer of cricket. Not only did Warnie feature on TV ads and the Macca’s homepage (he still does), he also popped up on the sightscreen behind the batsman throughout the Test and one-day series. And thousands of Aussie kids watch cricket on TV.
Even more worrying — in view of the latest childhood obesity figures — is that fast food companies like McDonald’s deliberately target children. McDonald’s sponsors Little Athletics in every state for kids as young as four and ran a Cricket Legends competition this summer aimed at boys as young as six, with a Warne coaching clinic as the prize. It also brands a Football4Schools soccer program and has 32,000 kids in Victorian basketball competitions and another 40,000 learning to swim in McDonald’s swim schools. It’s everywhere.
In 2009, McDonald’s signed a three-year deal with Collingwood and launched a series of junior football programs and events, including the “McDonald’s Mighty Footy Trip” and “McDonald’s Mighty Footy Nights”. According to the gush from Maccas and the Pies, the partnership — which Crikey understands is worth around $250,000 a year — is “dedicated to promoting healthy, active lifestyle choices to children”.
But Maccas is notorious: for giving away toys with its Happy Meals — it is now one of America’s biggest toy distributors — and for targeting kids with characters like Ronald McDonald. A 2007 US report cited research that more than half of Australian 9-10 year-olds believe Ronald knows what’s best for them to eat. More recently, McDonald’s bagged a hat trick in the Parents Jury 2009 Fame & Shame Awards for its underhand marketing to children.
“Give me the child to the age of seven and I’ll show you the man,” says the old Jesuit adage, and McDonald’s has clearly taken it to heart.
So too has rugby league boss David Gallop, who told The Sydney Morning Herald last week: ”We have got to be turning 7-year-olds on about rugby league, either as players or … fans for life.”
Coca-Cola clearly shares Gallop’s vision of grabbing them young. Despite a policy of not marketing to children, it sponsors the NRL’s U-13 Coca Cola Challenge Cup and the ARL’s U-13 Powerade Cup up north. It also brands the U-10 Powerade Cup for soccer in North Queensland, and targets pre-teens in its Kirks Lemonade TV ads, which show boys of 10 and 11 playing backyard cricket.
Gatorade, Milo, Uncle Toby’s and Cottee’s are other famous brands that are spending big to get their brands into kids sports like cricket, soccer, rugby league, AFL, basketball, swimming and athletics. Only tennis (which used to run McDonald’s-branded junior programs) and netball (which used to be sponsored by Gatorade) now remain on the sidelines.
“Commercial involvement is so important to the survival of sport in this modern day that we understand that sports are left with little option but to be associated with junk food brands,” says Netball Australia’s chief commercial officer Marne Flechner. “We don’t have a policy against the sponsorship of junk or fast food … though we are conscious of our messages to underage netballers.
“[But] we’re in a fortunate position … the only food company with a commercial interest in underage netball is pasta company San Remo… We’re delighted to have San Remo on board because we feel their brand values of healthy eating and family married nicely with junior netball.”
Sure, these brands all defend themselves with the disclaimer that their foods and drinks should be part of a balanced diet and an active, healthy lifestyle. But what the ads are saying is “buy me” and what the sports and celebrity endorsement is saying is “it’s OK”.
UPDATE 5.35pm:
A spokesperson for Coca Cola told Crikey:
Regarding our marketing to children policy, it is a policy that has been in place for a long time. On a regular basis we run training for our staff to ensure they understand the policy and checks to ensure compliance. The POWERADE Cup for under 10’s for example is a program that was picked up in one of our checks two years ago and subsequently the program was stopped. The web page you saw is out of date and we have contacted them to have the page updated. Regarding the Coca-Cola under 13 NRL Challenge Cup this is for 12 and 13-year-olds and therefore meets our policy. The young people in the Kirks ad are 12 years or over (as per our policy) when they were filmed for this ad. We checked this with the agency that hired them on our behalf.
Click on the images below for the first in a series of Brand and Sport profiles. Feel the synergy:
*Tomorrow: the experts say it’s not OK. This stuff is making us fat.


36 thoughts on “Just Chew It: how sport is super-sizing our kids”
MLF
March 8, 2011 at 10:18 amAnd that argument about if parents cant get their kids to eat good then its their own fault, they deserve to be obese – charming of you all by the way, some wonderful human qualities are shining through – is a) offensive and b) horsesh–it.
Tell me why I should have to argue with my kid who wants to eat a big mac instead of fish and vegetables? Why should I be forced to have that fight so that a) Warne can earn more bucks and b) McDonalds can earn more bucks? Why?
Why should my kid not inherently understand the difference between good food and bad food. “Athletes eats maccas, why can’t I?”
drmick
March 8, 2011 at 10:59 amBecuae if it wasn’t Maccas you would be blaming someone else.
You will always be blaming someone else.
Spend some time with your kids. Ask them. They will tell you the food is crap.
And, as far as marketing is concerned and getting them to buy more . Duuh!
Who controls the finances in your house? Who decides who their heroes and heroines are? For Christ’s sake, who would say to their kid, I want you to be just like him, he is a glory seeking, philandering show pony with the mind of a pig in heat and as smart as a very stupid sea going tadpole.
“Yeah Dad but he sure can bowl”.
“Yeah mate but that’s all he can do” He is good at nothing else. He is a failure as a father and a failure as a human being”.
Well lets go and but some greasy undercooked chicken and see if we can avoid guiardia lamblia this time?
So your point is?
Where is your Mc
Flower
March 8, 2011 at 12:53 pmOne glaring omission on this thread is the massive campaigns run by the meat and livestock industry the source of the products flogged by the junk food grim reapers. The meat and livestock industry occupies some 57% of Australia’s land mass. This is a cruel industry that is predominantly responsible for trashing the planet.
The Sam Neill ad for the meat and livestock industry portrays him holding hands with a chimp – gross. The chimp is a vegetarian for God’s sake. So are some of the strongest beasts on the planet i.e., the elephant and gorilla (our first cousin.)
I’m not a vegetarian but I’m seriously working on it – one meat meal a week. Cattle are given hormone growth promotants and chickens are force- fed antibiotics every day. Young boys are developing “man’ boobs. Girls are entering puberty earlier. And don’t forget the arsenic in the chicken feed either. This industry cares only about profits and organic food cost you big bucks so there’s more than one way to skin a rat – don’t put money in their pockets!
According to the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, the prevalence of overweight and obesity among Australians aged 18 and over rose from 56 percent to 61 percent in 2008. The prevalence of diagnosed diabetes in Australia almost tripled between 1990 and 2008.
I was raised in a very frugal environment where we only had chicken at Christmas and very little meat in the meantime and I was an athlete. The first chocolate I ever consumed was at the age of 13, albeit to my delight. Do we consumers care how many additives or fats are included in a Mars bar or any other confectionery? This toxic trash should only be consumed as a rare treat because it is unfit for human consumption but the grim reapers don’t care.
MLF
March 8, 2011 at 1:26 pmFlower, not to disregard your primary point at all – but hormones haven’t been used in chicken in Australia since they were banned over 50 years ago. Search Australian Food News for more.
drmick
March 8, 2011 at 1:39 pmTruth is the fist victim, before the facts, and after the rhetoric.
It would be nice to be able to afford principles.
Better still it would be nice to have principles in the first place.
Much easier to throw rocks.
Grinder
March 8, 2011 at 1:45 pmShould point out that Tim Cahill endorses a rather healthy breakfast cereal.
joanjett
March 8, 2011 at 2:26 pmFlower said that chickens are fed antibiotics, it’s beef which has hormones (something which Coles is phasing out to the ire of Woolworths)
MLF
March 8, 2011 at 4:33 pmNoted, thanks. As I said, I wasn’t meaning to take away from Flower’s point, I was just (incorrectly) correcting something in it…
Flower
March 8, 2011 at 4:34 pmThank you for your vigilance Joanjett in noting that I referred only to cattle in the use of HGPs. However, it appears that some antibiotics also act as hormone growth promotants.
In 2006, Canberra Hospital Infectious Diseases Unit director Peter Collignon said that people had the right to know what they were eating.
“This is an issue and we need the data,” Professor Collignon said. “It is beyond doubt that whenever you use antibiotics, you get resistance. But the animal industry seems to be denying this is happening.
“In Australia we use 250,000kg of antibiotics in people every year. In animals we use 500,000kg…….”
But the farce continues. In 2010 the Humane Society’s submission to the Australia & New Zealand Food Regulation Ministerial Council Review of food labelling law and policy advised that Australia imports around 700 tonnes of antibiotics each year, two thirds of which are used in the meat and livestock industry.
The M&L industry uses these antibiotics for therapy, disease prevention (prophylaxis), *growth promotion* (to increase feed conversion, growth rate and or yield), and protozoal disease control. In Australia, the pig industry alone utilises over 200 different varieties of antibiotics.
This is despite the agricultural reforms in Europe and the dire warnings of the US Centre for Disease Control and Prevention’s food poisoning surveillance program, “The reason we’re seeing an increase in antibiotic resistance in foodborne diseases is because of antibiotic use on the farm.” The Director-General of the World Health Organisation fears that this worldwide rise in antibiotic-resistant “superbugs” is threatening to “send the world back to a pre-antibiotic age.”
Already in Australia victims are having limbs amputated due to the emergence of antibiotic resistant super bugs. The meat and livestock industry in Australia will only consider the dire impacts of what they are doing when they are dragged kicking and screaming to a regulatory process which administers stringent enforcement procedures. They remain one of the most powerful lobby groups in this country (and unquestionably, the cruellest).
Suffer the little children of this nation, our future leaders, who are unwittingly paying the price.
MLF
March 8, 2011 at 8:59 pmDrMick if you are referring to me re: principles, this would appear to be another subject you are not equipped to discuss.
Don’t presume to tell me how to raise my children. You know nothing ahout me and you know nothing about them. They, incidentally, are just fine. Perfectly healthy kids who love good food and also relish treats. I’m not raising these points out of concern for my own children. No, I’m concerned about a generation of children who are growing up with diseases that will shorten their life expectancy. I’m concerned that low income earners are more prone to poor health. I’m concerned that role models who earn an absolute fortune stick two fingers up at the responsibility they should be honored to have.
Thats me. And how about you?
You show you are intellectually incapable of formulating a logical or cohesive argument, you absolutely failed to acknowledge the point I was making about sports people showing some responsibility for the elevated position they hold in society, and then you and then tell me to go away and die.
And you’re worried about my kids?