Queensland floods:

Anne Cooper writes: Re. “‘Hardest times still ahead’: Queensland floods” (yesterday, item 1). Things are so depressing up here in Brisbane. Imagine the Yarra River flooding — pretty much the same. Richmond, CBD, MCG, Doncaster, Warrandyte — everywhere. That’s similar to our Brisbane River. We only just got the power back on this morning. Hope it stays that way. The house is high and dry, but 11,000 others in Brisbane’s suburbs and CBD are flooded. Energex has had to switch off power to stop sub-stations from blowing.  Sorry, you probably know all this from the media coverage.

So upset that the SES wont deploy us. If authorities and media knew that thousands of the local SES volunteers are sitting around BUSTING to help, and instead interstate and OS people are on the job, they would have a fit that we are not being used. I could scream. We are all so frustrated.

There’s no milk up here. No “D” size batteries left for radios and torches. The only vegetables left at supermarkets that I went to yesterday was celery. Not one loaf of bread. Apparently shelves were cleaned out by 10am yesterday morning. Paul’s Milk is flooded and not producing and a lot of produce from up north is stopped getting through because Bruce Highway has been cut. No flour either for the supermarket bakeries.

Sorry … just venting.

A Crikey reader writes: A few people are making the mistake that the biggest difference between ’74 and this week’s flood is the existence of Wivenhoe Dam. That’s the second biggest difference. The critical issue is that the amount of  water in the catchment/river is much bigger than ’74.

The premier quoted 2.5 million litres (think she meant 2.5 million megalitres) for this event compared to 1.5 million in ’74. That’s the real difference. If this was just a ’74 style weather event, we wouldn’t be having ’74 style flooding because Wivenhoe could cope.

I think it’s worth making the point because a lot of people think Wivenhoe hasn’t done its job. It has — very well. It’s just that this is an exceptional event — more extreme climatic conditions, anyone?

Beryce Nelson writes: Thanks for the great info on the floods – the message is finally getting through. Things have improved a little upstream but not much. Smaller towns and communities in Somerset Region, EG: Esk (badly flooded on the 11th) Toogoolawah ( low level flooding and cut off since the 9th) Somerset Dam township and Kilcoy (both flooded and cut off since the 8th) are still experiencing the consequences of the storms, flooding rains, damaged infrastructure and caring for hundreds of displaced people.

The Toogoolawah IGA supermarket shelves are now virtually empty and bread supplies had to be flown in by helicopter yesterday. More importantly, many of us still have family and/or friends missing in Toowoomba or the Lockyer Valley and/or have others facing the onslaught in Ipswich and Brisbane. We are all just so tired.

Attached are photographs of the normally flat and dry farmlands at the rear of my home in Toogoolawah. They were taken over three consecutive days of the same area and reveal how quickly and dangerously high the waters rose over that period.

toogoo1

9th Jan

toogoo2

10th Jan

toogoo3

11th Jan

Keith Binns writes: I live in an area that doesn’t yet get digital TV and won’t for 18 months. We usually get five channels but have, courtesy of the Queensland floods, been reduced to three and occasionally two or one: SBS and channel 10 and the floods. SBS and the floods. The floods. I care about the floods. I’m not callous. I have friends there who I haven’t been able to contact because the phone lines are down. It’s a worry. The death toll is frightening. But I don’t want to watch endless videos of the same events while hearing similar commentary.

You can only watch cars being swept away a certain number of times before you lose interest. I’d rather watch a normal program (in my case it’s the tennis on channel 7) and have updates for five or ten minutes once an hour. But all I can watch is the floods. Normal programs have been shunted to the new digital channels which I can’t get. I’m running out of DVDs. (One also wonders at the urban planning in Brisbane after 1974 when new buildings were built on areas known to flood. Guess what? They’re flooding now. What a surprise!).

And the level of questioning by the press gallery already mentioned explains why the only nightly TV news commentary worth watching is The 7pm Project who does it with intelligence, humour and common sense. It will be sad when Packer and Murdoch inevitably ruin it.

Arizona shooting:

Cameron Bray writes: Re. “Plenty of blame to go around in Arizona” (yesterday, item 14). That armed resistance is a legitimate response to tyrannical government is a massively important part of the American psyche. It is, after all, their founding myth.

When this is combined with the — far more recent — rightist conceit that citizens have an individual right to reject some or all government, you have a potentially powerful cocktail. When you add in the catalyst — the even more recent idea that liberal government is necessarily tyrannical, and either illegitimate or unpatriotic or both — then you have a really dangerous mix of ideas.

You can’t put this all together: that tyranny legitimates violence, that the individual has a right to resist tyranny and that the current government is by its nature illegitimate and tyrannical — and then claim no responsibility for what people do with that.

Post-Tuscon apologists for rightist rhetoric essentially say “Yeah sure, we advocate active — possibly armed — resistance against Democrats. Just not that particular type of armed resistance.”

This is just too cute by half.

Peter Fray

Save 50% on a year of Crikey and The Atlantic.

The US election is in a little over a month. It seems that there’s a ridiculous twist in the story, almost every day.

Luckily for new Crikey subscribers, we’ve teamed up with one of America’s best publications, The Atlantic for the election race. Subscribe now to make sense of it all, and you’ll get a year of Crikey (usually $199) and a year’s digital subscription to The Atlantic (usually $70AUD), BOTH for just $129.

Peter Fray
Editor-in-chief of Crikey

JOIN NOW