Dec 16, 2010

The BER outcome: time to correct the record

The latest report on the BER program again demolishes the campaign waged against it by the media.

Bernard Keane — Politics editor

Bernard Keane

Politics editor

Here, in a nutshell, is the result of months of expensive work by the Orgill review team examining the government’s Building the Education Revolution component of its stimulus packages:
  • It will support, all up, about 120,000 jobs directly and indirectly, "filling a gap left in demand from the private sector and playing an important role in supporting apprentices and skill retention in the building and construction industry".
  • The program’s impact was "most pronounced" in its first year, when it was needed most.
  • The new infrastructure is, in the review team’s opinion, "sorely needed, particularly in government schools".
  • The review received complaints from 294 schools across the entire program -- 3% of the 10,000-odd school projects.
  • The review team closely examined 57 projects, nearly all of which were drawn from "the most egregious complaints received by the Taskforce or were selected from our reading of media reports". Seventeen of those 57 projects were found to fail the value-for-money criteria established by the review team.
  • Extrapolating that 17/57 figure across all complaints (even though the selected projects were "the most egregious") suggests the rate of valid complaints about value for money is 0.9% of all projects.
  • The review has lowered its estimate of how much more the NSW government paid in order to deliver its projects quickly, from 5-6% to "at the bottom of that range, around 5 per cent".
  • The total complaint rate even for NSW government school projects, which attracted more than half of all complaints, was 7%.
In short, the report is a comprehensive demolition of the campaign that has been run against the program by the opposition -- which having missed out with two independent reports now wants a third -- and The Australian. That campaign has consisted of claims that the BER was providing poor value for money, that it was useless because it wouldn’t provide any stimulus until after the economy recovered, that the infrastructure was entirely unnecessary, that it was all a "debacle". In fact, the BER has been a gold standard stimulus program, delivering tens of thousands of jobs, when they were needed, building needed infrastructure, across a vast number of locations, with an almost derisory complaint rate even in NSW, where the government rushed the program as quickly as possible. And what of The Australian and journalists like Matthew Franklin, who has sat in the press gallery bureau and waged a campaign against the program? Or the ABC journalists happy to follow the News Limited line and parrot that the program was a "debacle" on par with the insulation program? Perhaps those journalists should ask the tens of thousands of men and women in the construction industry who still have jobs despite the collapse in private construction since the GFC, who are still in work despite the commercial construction sector grinding to a halt, despite new housing construction going into a precipitate decline this year. Ask the apprentices still learning on the job. Ask their families, their partners and kids. Ask the retailers where they shop. Ask their banks. Check with them if they think it was a "debacle". That’s not likely to happen either. The media doesn’t like the construction industry, despite it being one of our biggest employers. Maybe it’s journalistic snobbery about manual labour. Or maybe it’s because the only yarn from the construction industry that the media is interested in is about union thuggery. Particularly at The Australian, which led the charge in favour of the Howard government’s assault on the CFMEU -- an assault that led to a systematic abrogation of basic civil rights, in the form of the ABCC, and a big rise in workplace deaths. Is it any wonder the Coalition and the media despise a program that has been critical in keeping the industry going since the GFC?

Free Trial

You've hit members-only content.

Sign up for a FREE 21-day trial to keep reading and get the best of Crikey straight to your inbox

By starting a free trial, you agree to accept Crikey’s terms and conditions


Leave a comment

31 thoughts on “The BER outcome: time to correct the record

  1. Jimmy

    The Herald Sun headline for it’s report on the BER report was something like “C+ for schools stimulus” and it buried the positive statistics right at the tail of the article. I can’t see New Ltd admitting it got it wrong any time soon. In fact due to the refugee story this one will get hardly any air at all.

  2. klewso

    The problem for the ABC seems to be that too many of it’s “op-eds” seem to have forgotten what “journalism” is all about and seem to be auditioning for “Limited News”, echoing it’s interpretation of “news” – because “it’s in print”. Some even work for both now.
    Last time I looked “journos” were just as much a part of our society, and subject to it’s mores, as anyone else – but they won’t look enquiringly at what each other is doing, like they would “rubes”?

  3. zut alors

    Where’s Christopher Pyne for a comment on this? Calling Christopher Pyne, hello….?

  4. zut alors


    I don’t think the ABC scribes have much time for their own thoughts and angles on stories these days as they’re on that wretched treadmill of trying to fill 24 hours with news. Even with stocking-fillers such as old Landline and Australian Story re-runs, there’s still too much vacant airtime and the staff scramble to plug the massive holes.

    What a shame ABC News24 missed much of the Christmas Island drama – apparently our national news service was focussed on a dispute between the Ballina croquet and bowls clubs (see today’s Crikey Tips and Rumours).

  5. David

    Pyne the sleaze. He squeeled like a 12 yr old schoolgirl at a Justin Bieber concert, for months about the shame, the disgrace, the waste, the misuse of money that he considered the BER. Now he slinks away to his hole and hides, no ticker, no spine. A pathetic waste of space, SHAME.

  6. zut alors

    David, ‘He squeeled like a 12 yr old schoolgirl at a Justin Bieber concert…’

    I suspect The Hon Christopher Pyne has actually been to a Justin Bieber concert.

  7. tonyfunnywalker

    The silence on the ABC continues – I await with interest the editorial in the Australian tomorrow.

    As for “Pyne ‘o” Sleaze ” David says it all.

    Great Xmas Gift for Gillard though… hope she makes the most of it.

  8. David

    @ tonyfunnywalker…too true Tony, I look forward to hearing Julia throw it all back in the creeps face, she took a lot from him and his gutter dwelling mates, Morisson and Hunt.

  9. Jean Morreau

    The BER has only deepened cynicism in most of the schools I know.
    What is galling for Principals is that after years of scrimping and mountains of paperwork to get just a couple of thousand dollars extra for learning support and disability support, they are given a building and expected to be grateful.
    Most Principals wouldn’t bother complaining – they have done it for years with little result.

  10. Tony Eastwood

    30% of the complaints were held to be overpriced projects. It is widely held that most did not complain for fear of retribution. Would have been better if the money had been spent on improving education, (school halls and canteens does not equate to improving education). Typical Labor Party spending taxpayers money like drunken sailors, by the way the unions got a good cut from the BER program, many many millions of dollars I read, suppose they will funnell it back to the Labor party come election time.

Leave a comment

Share this article with a friend

Just fill out the fields below and we'll send your friend a link to this article along with a message from you.

Your details

Your friend's details