While the wait for a government continues, here is the advice that the National Rural Health Alliance gave the independents last week:
“The NRHA proposes that interested parliamentarians seek a formal written commitment that the new Government should:
1. Plan and deliver broadband access to homes and businesses throughout the nation.
Fast broadband is essential for e-health, commerce, business, education, connectivity and recreation. The price will be affordable for consumers, irrespective of their location and the technology used. Function will determine required speed e.g. e-health requires sufficient speed to sustain real-time transmission of accurate images for telemedicine.
Get Crikey FREE to your inbox every weekday morning with the Crikey Worm.
Reporting requirement: Annual report to Parliament, against a detailed budget and timeline.
2. Bi-partisan approach to indigenous wellbeing.
In government, provide the party in opposition with the opportunity to confirm a bipartisan approach to national inter-government work to improve the state of health and wellbeing of Australia’s Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples.
Reporting requirement: Annual report to Parliament.
3. A fair share of the extra money that is to be spent on hospitals.
Require states and territories to deliver a measurable and fair share of the extra money to be spent on hospitals (beds, emergency departments, elective surgery, sub-acute care, mental health, etc) in rural and remote areas. The extra resources may at times be better directed to acute care facilities that are not “hospitals” (e.g. MPSs) and to services that are “better than hospital beds” (e.g. hospital in the home).
This commitment includes confirmation that block funding (not activity-based) will be provided to smaller hospitals. The quantum of block funds will allow for the service obligations of smaller hospitals and the number of people (weighted by health need and socio-economic status) served by them.
Reporting requirement: A report in each year of the government’s term — by region (major city, regional, rural, remote) — and stepped action if the evidence shows that there is not a fair rural share in year one.
4. A new pool and allocation system for health infrastructure.
Create a new pool of resources for health infrastructure (including the GP super clinic program, REID, the RMIF and the commitments made in the election campaign to augment infrastructure in general practices) and a new process for allocating resources from the pool. Allocations would be made on the basis of demonstrated need for such infrastructure, rather than by government decision (in the case of GP super clinics) and through competitive grant applications (in the case of REID and RMIF). In the first term of the new government, allocations would be made through a formula managed by the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. The formula would comprise data on access to a GP and other primary care professionals, socioeconomic status and population health data. Allocated resources would go to the health facility best able to provide improved services – not necessarily general practice.
Reporting requirement: A report each year assessing the allocation of these funds by region (major city, regional, rural, remote).