Facebook Google Menu Linkedin lock Pinterest Search Twitter


TV & Radio

May 6, 2010

Chris Uhlmann a pro, says Abbott, but is there an ABC double-standard?

ABC political reporter Chris Uhlmann isn’t hiding the fact his PR consultant wife will run for the ALP in the upcoming federal election. But do all ABC journos receive the same treatment?


When Gai Brodtmann won Labor preselection for the seat of Canberra, her husband hit the phones to talk to senior Liberals, including Tony Abbott. Chris Uhlmann wanted to know whether the opposition had a problem with one of the ABC’s most senior Canberra hacks sleeping with an opponent.

Abbott does not — a spokesperson told Crikey there are “no concerns whatsoever from our corner”. Nor does the ABC, which says it’s “comfortable” with Uhlmann continuing his role as Canberra commentator on the 7:30 Report and, later this year, taking up the position of political editor at the ABC’s new 24-hour news channel just months out from a federal election campaign.

The Liberal leader calls Uhlmann a “highly professional journalist” — a fact nobody disputes. But some inside the ABC criticise a policy left open to interpretation by management. Crikey has learned of one case where a reporter was stood down from all political reporting because of a relationship with a candidate.

Uhlmann told Crikey he can manage the conflict — he’s become pretty good at it, he says, since the couple’s first meeting in 1991, with Brodtmann working as a political adviser during the ACT government elections and Uhlmann then a journalist for the Canberra Times. Reporting on politics is conducted as carefully as conversation sometimes needs to be negotiated at home.

“We have been managing it for the course of our lives,” he said. “We’re careful in what we discuss with each other.”

Brodtmann, a PR consultant, former ministerial adviser to Bob McMullan and long-time Labor Party member, looks set for parliament after winning a messy factional fight — Canberra is held by retiring MP Annette Ellis on a sizeable 11.8% margin.

That’s fine by Alan Sunderland, the head of national programs for ABC News, who told Crikey he’s “very comfortable” with the relationship. While there’s “obviously a potential conflict to be managed”, the journalist hasn’t reported on the preselection and can avoid covering her election challenge.

“We look at what is the conflict, what has to be avoided, can he then go on and do his normal job? In this case the answer is yes,” he said. “We think they’re [the potential for conflict] perfectly manageable in the current environment.”

According to section 4.4.6 of the ABC’s editorial policies manual: “supervisors must be told about any associations or interests which an individual has that may conflict with editorial responsibilities”, and “the responsible managers … will decide the appropriate course of action”. This includes excluding a reporter from an assignment or “particular stories or programs related to the outside activity, association or interest”, and/or making a “public disclosure … broadcast or published online”.

Uhlmann is taking a position of open disclosure. He posed for photos in The Australian after Brodtmann’s win — less about his job and more because, as he asks, what husband wouldn’t stand by his wife after such a momentous occasion? — and took the matter to his bosses at the first available opportunity.

“It’s a perfectly reasonable thing to raise and I have no problems with people raising it at all,” he said.

“There is the potential there for a real conflict. I guess in the end people will judge what I do by how I conduct myself.”

But other cases have been dealt with differently. In 2008, Northern Territory Stateline presenter Margie Smithurst was stood down from the position during an election campaign that had her then boyfriend running as a candidate for the ALP. She was not allowed to return to hosting the program once he was elected to parliament, or report as part of radio current affairs in case political stories came up.

Smithurst — who has since ended the relationship and moved to Melbourne to present for the ABC’s Asia-Pacific television service — didn’t want to comment on the decision when contacted by Crikey. But she did say it put considerable strain on the relationship due “to the pressures of not being able to do the job I wanted to do”.

Sunderland confirmed the case but noted Smithurst was a temporary fill-in presenter of Stateline. He said her boyfriend, now party whip Michael Gunner, was “too central to the political debate” at the time. “Because politics was so small in the Northern Territory the notion of a back-bencher is redundant,” he said.

But others inside the ABC point to the subjectivity of what constitutes conflict and what action should be taken to avoid it. Sunderland admits matters are dealt with on a case-by-case basis, though “the principles are hard and fast”.

“Sometimes disclosure is enough, sometimes more than disclosure is required,” he said.


We recommend

From around the web

Powered by Taboola


Leave a comment

16 thoughts on “Chris Uhlmann a pro, says Abbott, but is there an ABC double-standard?

  1. SBH

    No conflict? I think John Elliott said most eloquently – ‘Pigs *rse!’

  2. Margo

    Did it matter much when Democrats Senator Natasha Stott Despoja and Channel Nine newsreader Hugh Riminton were an item?

  3. JamesK

    Probably one of the few political reporters at ‘Their’ ABC along with Leigh Sales and Barry Cassidy seen by the centre-right as at least fair.

    And now look who’s raising the issue.

    No matter how silly the Left never lose an opportunity.

  4. GC51

    Serious up people.
    Uhlmann is a fine reporter who cuts no-one slack.
    I can’t wait for the 24hr news channel, then again I also watch Question Time, (not the Senate, I’m not that bored).

  5. stephen martin

    I guess the proof of the pudding is in the eating. We will just have to wait and see; personally I think that Uhlmann will be able to maintain an objective view, if only for the sake of his professional standing.

  6. David

    Jamesk you obviously have not been “listening” to the ABC. That once professional organisation, do not restrict their news and current affairs to television. The radio section of Aunty, is now a serious contender to join the Libs own newspaper the Oz, as another Lib protected species. I smell incense in the air and rattle of beads as a certain person dressed in robes with a skull cap perched atop his cranium, takes another lunch with a certain Mr Scott. Oh the power of those personal absolutions.

  7. rovan2

    Well I think this explains the reasons why Uhlmann seems unable to be fair to Labor…he’s so afraid of seeming biased! Or the alternative, which is that he wants to do whatever he can to make sure his wife stays out of the political frontline!

  8. SBH

    You’re right GC51, Uhlmann is a fine reporter. The question is can he stay that way if required to report negatively on his wife or more impotrantly on people who can destroy her new career? I don’t remember much negative stuff on Bob McMullen coming from Uhlmann. Why would that be?

  9. Phil

    It’s all becoming very clear now. Chris is a pro allright, no left, and no wonder. It’s always intrigued me why our Aunty went all rightard on us. Here I was thinking it was 12 long hard years of Howard manipulation and bias bashing until the truth became a leftwing conspiracy.
    Sorry Chris, had no idea you were overcompensating to cover your arse because of love and a perceived mixed marriage.

  10. GC51

    SBH – I take your point.
    Colour me optimistic.
    I guess I’ll have to wait and see.

  11. JamesK

    Yes David but besides Phillip Adams, Tony Eastley, Fran Kelly, Glen Bartholomew, Marius Benson, Anna Hipsley and Deborah Cameron can you name another conservative voice on ABC radio?

  12. JamesK

    Oh! O.k.vDavid……. I’ll grant you that Jon Faine is a teensy weensy on the right wingnut side.

  13. Frank Campbell

    The elephant in the bed. The entire culture/media/political class is entwined like a Hindu temple frieze. No one says a word, publicly. Except Crikey occasionally, with its lists of “partners”. Although conflict of interest in a small society is inevitable, Australia is downright incestuous. The CMP class is sclerotic: the same cast of characters persists for decades. Sooner or later, everyone screws everyone else. Property, politics, employment…it all gets sucked in. The result is a Byzantine tangle of hates, loves, favours, slights…

    As for the politicians, playing away is their profession- consorting daily with the media. Propinquity. Opportunity. Subsidy. Ego.

    The code of silence is rarely broken. They’re all in it together. So naturally Abbott covers for Uhlmann. This testament actually reinforces the code.

    Uhlmann/Brodtmann’s “conflict” is made public now, pre-emptively, but it’s been going on for twenty years:

    “Uhlmann told Crikey he can manage the conflict — he’s become pretty good at it, he says, since the couple’s first meeting in 1991, with Brodtmann working as a political adviser during the ACT government elections and Uhlmann then a journalist for the Canberra Times.”

    Well that’s all right then.

    Protestations about “managing” these conflicts of interest “professionally” (what a versatile, supple word…) are self-serving and disingenuous.

  14. Ian

    Implying that Chris Uhlman is professional in his work is one hell of a stretch. He’s just another lib shill.

  15. David

    James I doubt Phillip Adams would regard himself as a conservative. Methinks you take the micky. Perhaps a heavily leaning to the left conservatve :-)…In July 1996 Prime Minister John Howard said in an interview with journalist Peter Cole-Adams: “I think one of the weaknesses of the ABC is that it doesn’t have a right-wing Phillip Adams. I think that would be a good idea. It would make a lot of people feel things were better”.
    The others I concur.
    Bye for now gladies and podies.

  16. Cuppa

    Chris Uhlmann himself stood as a political candidate some years ago – for a minor Christian party. He’s a conservative, so will probably feel the need to go in harder against Labor than the others – just to “prove that he isn’t biased”.

    To avoid accusations of “bias”, the ABC singles out Labor for attack, while giving heaps of airtime plus hourly sounbites to Liberals and priority to Liberal press releases in news reportage.

    Tune into an ABC Radio news bulletin or current affairs show, and you will quickly get the political flavour.


https://www.crikey.com.au/2010/05/06/chris-uhlmann-a-pro-says-abbott-but-is-there-an-abc-double-standard/ == https://www.crikey.com.au/free-trial/==https://www.crikey.com.au/subscribe/

Show popup

Telling you what the others don't. FREE for 21 days.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.