Sep 24, 2009

It’s speech night at the UN summit: Gaddafi goes off

Which politician hasn't been at a podium somewhere in the past 24 hours spouting their own brand of rhetoric?

Which politician hasn't been at a podium somewhere in the past 24 hours spouting their own brand of rhetoric? The UN Summit in New York meant many speeches, the most notable of which (not for the right reasons) was Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi's barking mad effort, full of conspiracy theories and six times longer than his alotted 15 minute slot. As Ed Pilkington writes in The Guardian:
He tore up a copy of the UN charter in front of startled delegates, accused the security council of being an al-Qaida like terrorist body, called for George Bush and Tony Blair to be put on trial for the Iraq war, demanded $7.7tn in compensation for the ravages of colonialism on Africa, and wondered whether swine flu was a biological weapon created in a military laboratory. At one point, he even demanded to know who was behind the killing of JFK. All in all, a pretty ordinary 100 minutes in the life of the colonel. To be fair, this was a man suffering from severe sleep deprivation. The US state department, New York city council and Donald Trump had prevented him from laying his weary head in an air-conditioned tent in New Jersey, Central Park and Bedford respectively, and the resulting strain was evident. "I woke up at 4am, before dawn!" Gaddafi lamented about an hour into his speech, adding for the benefit of the jetlagged diplomats seated stony-faced in front of him: "You should be asleep! You're all tired after a sleepless night!"
It doesn't look like Gaddafi's efforts to secure a campsite -- or a seat at the international table -- will get any easier. Prime Minister Kevin Rudd, in a somewhat more moderate speech in New York, was calling for a radical overhaul of the main bodies that set policies for the global economy, reports Anne Davies in The Sydney Morning Herald. And who would head up such a massive change? Said Rudd:
America remains uniquely qualified, through the combination of its hard power and its soft power, through the narrative of its history and the consistency of its purpose, to shoulder the great responsibilities of our time.
It was only hours, notes Davies, before Obama, giving his first speech to the UN General Assembly, would implore that it's not ''solely America's endeavour'' to save the world from itself. President Obama pushed for a global approach to global issues, like climate change, peace and ending nuclear proliferation. But at times it was a tough crowd. Reports The Washington Post:
His audience included several foreign leaders his administration is seeking to face down on the diplomatic front, among them Iran's president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who has rebuffed other countries' calls to stop enriching uranium and has thumbed his nose at criticism of his human rights record, his hostility toward Israel and his support for terrorism. Ahmadinejad sat without reacting obviously in the fifth row as Obama publicly chided his country for its pursuit of nuclear weapons, saying Iran's actions -- and similar efforts by North Korea -- "threaten to take us down this dangerous slope" that makes the whole world less secure.
The full text of Obama's speech is here. Ahmadinejad spoke later on topics from religion to humanity, but failed to mention the elephant in the room: his government's nuclear program. Rudd also addressed the UN General Assembly, again chatting about the need for reform of "global governance" to ensure institutions would stay stable. He even managed to get in a nod to his favourite people: "The price of failure of these institutions has been paid by working people and their families right across the world." In London meanwhile, Opposition Leader Malcolm Turnbull presented a speech to the United Kingdom Policy Exchange (just who is minding the country?). While Rudd was calling for more regulation, Turnbull was calling for less. Matthew Franklin writes in The Australian that:
Mr Turnbull ... [said] ... that the global financial crisis had promoted a resurgence in "democratic socialism", including a view held by Mr Rudd that governments must be "at the centre of the economy". Arguing that the best governments understood and accepted the limits of their power, the Opposition Leader said governments must not be allowed to impose themselves on businesses and individuals. "It is critical that parties of the centre-right not be spooked or intimidated by the sense of crisis into greater tolerance, let alone acceptance, of the notion of government intrusion into economic activity that is best left to the private sector," Mr Turnbull told the think tank.

Also calling for financial deregulation and tax cuts for business was none other than failed Republican VP candidate Sarah Palin, who addressed a Hong Kong business audience in what was said to be her first public-speaking engagement outside North America. "We're not interested in government fixes, we're interested in freedom," she said.

Unlike Gaddafi, she knew how to work her audience. The Wall Street Journal reports:
Ms. Palin warmed up the crowd with her impressions of Hong Kong, one of the densest urban areas in the world. "The wildlife-to-human ratio is different from Alaska, but I could get used to it," she said. She also spoke about how Alaska once shared a land bridge with Asia. And she noted that her husband's Eskimo ancestors crossed that bridge. "To consider that connection that allowed sharing of peoples and bloodlines and wildlife and flora and fauna, that connection to me is quite fascinating," she said.

Free Trial

You've hit members-only content.

Sign up for a FREE 21-day trial to keep reading and get the best of Crikey straight to your inbox

By starting a free trial, you agree to accept Crikey’s terms and conditions


Leave a comment

4 thoughts on “It’s speech night at the UN summit: Gaddafi goes off

  1. Stilgherrian

    Just who is minding the country?

    I thought that totally hot ranga chick was in charge.

    Can you say “totally hot”? I seem to remember reading somewhere…

  2. michael crook

    I agree with Gaddafi, the Iraq war was, is, a war crime and the perpetrators including our own beloved John Winston, should certainly be facing an international war crimes tribunal. I recently heard Rupert Murdoch being compared to Goebbels, Hitler’s Minister for Propaganda, Murdoch certainly did his job of selling the war very well. Should he also face trial? How come when we commit war crimes its ok and when “they” do it it becomes terrorism.

  3. Tom McLoughlin

    The abc reported some things about his speech omitted here – that the security council should not have a veto. That more people have died in wars since WW2 than during it and the UN failed to prevent them.

    The notion that Africa has been plundered by cynical colonialist commercial interests feeding off localised wars is also not that novel actually. Also the article doesn’t mention his current tenure chosen to lead the African Union for one year.

    There is no analysis about how his quixotic or even perverse speech might have been shaped to appease disparate interests there. Who for instance in the UN gives a flying proverbial about “Western Sydney” in PM Rudd’s speech?

    Even so we can be sure Rudd was voted for unlike the Libyan.

  4. Tom McLoughlin

    Today’s item 17, and I quote in case the Libyan is onto something?!, what a hoot:

    Professor Peter Collignon, of the Clinical School at the Australian National University, writes:

    In 1976, a small group of soldiers at Fort Dix in the US were infected with a swine flu virus. It had an apparent high mortality rate and was deemed similar to the virus responsible for the great 1918-19 worldwide flu pandemic. The US government initiated an unprecedented effort to immunise every American against swine flu. More than 40 million Americans received the vaccine — but the disease never spread to the population.

Share this article with a friend

Just fill out the fields below and we'll send your friend a link to this article along with a message from you.

Your details

Your friend's details