Fears that the economic slum is coming faster than thought has forced the Reserve Bank into making another larger than expected rate cut for a second month in row. The bank this afternoon slashed interest rates by 0.75%, to take its cuts since its September meeting to 2%, the quickest and fastest rate cuts in its history. The last time the RBA cut rates as quickly was in February-April of 2001 when it chopped the cash rate by 1.50%. But nothing like a sequence of 0.25% in September, 1% last month and 0.75% today. At 5.25%, the cash rate is the lowest since late 2003. It’s a sign that the central bank has become very concerned that the economy is sliding quickly into recession next year, as the likes of Goldman Sachs JBWere, JPMorgan and a growing number of other forecasters are saying. It’s now saying that spending and activity in the economy will be “weaker than earlier expected’. Instead of worrying that the improving terms of trade will push too much money into the economy, falling international demand and commodity prices will now have a “dampening influence” on the domestic economy. Yesterday’s weaker than expected house price index figures, showing a the biggest fall for decades, a sharp fall in retail sales, manufacturing and job ads in October, all point to the level of activity in the economy slowing at a rate much faster than previously thought. The fact that the bank cut rates 0.75% to 5.25%, is a sign that it now seems growth slumping. And another rate cut is on the cards next month as a result and the bank could cut the cash rate under 5%, especially if the September guarter’s growth figures are bad, when released at the end of this month. Unlike last month when it in part justified the surprise 1% cut on forcing as much of the rate cut through to borrowers, they were not mentioned in today’s statement accompanying the decision by Reserve Bank Governor, Glenn Stevens. The bank merely pointed to “recent reductions in borrowing rates” working with the impact of the weaker dollar and the Federal Government’s stimulation package to “assist growth in the period ahead.” The bank had forecast in the August Monetary Policy Statement that non farm GDP would dip to 1.5% annual this quarter before edging up to be running at around 2% in the second half of 2009. (The RBA updates Monetary Policy next Monday with the latest quarterly statement.) The bank seems to be warning that the slowdown in economic growth is almost upon us: previously it has been looking for growth to dip in the first half of next year and continue at low levels into the second half. “Recent reductions in borrowing rates, the depreciation of the exchange rate and the fiscal stimulus announced in October will work to assist growth in the period ahead, but deteriorating international conditions and falling commodity prices will have a dampening influence. “On balance, it appears likely that spending and activity will be weaker than earlier expected. “In Australia, the overall path of economic activity appears until recently to have been close to what the Board had expected, with a needed moderation in demand occurring after a period of earlier strength. International economic data have continued to point to significant weakness in the major industrial economies, and there have been further signs that China and other parts of the developing world are slowing as well. These conditions have contributed to further falls in world commodity prices.
“Consumer price inflation in Australia remained high in the September quarter. As expected, CPI inflation in year‑ended terms picked up to 5 per cent, while underlying measures were just over 4½ per cent.
“Nonetheless, capacity pressures are now easing and, given the outlook for more moderate growth in demand and activity, it is reasonable to expect that inflation in Australia will soon start to fall. Global disinflationary forces will assist in this regard, though the depreciation of the exchange rate means that the decline of inflation to the target could take longer than would otherwise be the case.
“Weighing up these international and domestic developments, the Board judged that a further significant reduction in the cash rate was warranted. The Board will continue to monitor developments and make adjustments as needed to promote sustainable growth consistent with achieving the 2–3 per cent inflation target over time.”
Read Alan Kohler’s take at Business Spectator.
Get your first 12 weeks of Crikey for $12.
Without subscribers, Crikey can’t do what it does. Fortunately, our support base is growing.
Every day, Crikey aims to bring new and challenging insights into politics, business, national affairs, media and society. We lift up the rocks that other news media largely ignore. Without your support, more of those rocks – and the secrets beneath them — will remain lodged in the dirt.
Join today and get your first 12 weeks of Crikey for just $12.
Peter Fray
Editor-in-chief of Crikey
Leave a comment
Yay, inflation is under control because no-one has any money to spend. Now they can spend some borrowed money; hopefully just enough to keep the economy from imploding. Unfortunately, after that, they will be just that little bit more in debt and it will make an future increase in rates even more painful. Afterall, borrowing has just reduced not actually stopped or turned into net savings. There is, of course, the possibility, just a remote possibility, that the people lending money to Australian banks might want it back some day. So unless we drop rates forever it just puts the evil day off a little longer.
It is entertaining, however, to read the commentary on many mainstream websites, which is along the lines of “Told you interest rates would be lower under labour”, “Did not”, “Did” , “Did not”, “Well what about the 17% rates under Keating, smarty pants, ha!”. Personally I don’t think the economy notices the Prime Minister much, but that won’t stop him throwing money at it to get its attention when it continues to tank.
You have to be cynical when the Commonwealth Bank, within minutes of the RBA announcement, only passed on .58% of the .75% rate cut.
Are rate cuts a consumer bailout, or another bank bailout.? If RBA rate cuts can’t be passed on to the consumer, why then is the RBA underwriting the profitability of the banks. Both sides of politics should be up in arms. Why the extra .25% rate cut 2 weeks ago, and now they are holding back?
Banks cannot collude with each other about rate cuts. The only way they can signal each other about their intentions is with a pre-emptive price move. That is probably why the CBA made their announcement so quickly. They are telling the other banks that one of their major competitors is not passing on the full rate cut. Have you noticed that there have not been other Bank rate-cut announcements? The other banks have got CBA’s message, and they are currently having their meetings on how to respond. If the other Banks only match CBA’s cut – the tactic worked.
You would think that with all the Government largesse passed on to the Banks, and the death of the alternate non-bank finance sector, the Banks would have been more comfortable with being bigger fish in a small pond, and therefore treat their customers with more respect.
http://blog.traderscircle.com.au/