Menu lock


Oct 29, 2008

Chloe Hooper: In search of Palm Island’s true victims

Cameron Doomadgee’s death on Palm Island triggered a kind of war, writes Chloe Hooper.

On Monday it was announced that the twenty-two Queensland police officers involved in Palm Island’s November 26 2004 riot would receive bravery awards. No doubt it was terrifying to wear a police uniform on the island that day. Nineteen police officers found themselves barricaded in the police barracks as locals threw rocks and mangos and steel pickets over the cyclone wire fence, yelling, “We are going to burn you! Kill the c-nts, the Captain Cook c-nts!”

Over the road the police station was ablaze, as was the house of Senior Sergeant Chris Hurley. A week earlier, Hurley had locked up Cameron Doomadgee for swearing, and left him to die with injuries consistent with a victim of a car or plane crash. Nevertheless that morning the State Coroner had announced Doomadgee’s death was the result of a fall. This riot was both a protest and payback.

A local plumber, Lex Wotton, had given the police an hour to get off the island. The officers passed around a mobile phone and rang their wives to say goodbye, then they counted their bullets. One man took a BBQ lid to use as a shield, another a cricket bat, someone else broke billiard cues in two and handed the pieces to his colleagues for protection. The police stalled for time until helicopters and planes with reinforcements arrived. Seeing they had no hope, the rioters went home and in the end no one was seriously hurt.

That night, crack police squads with tasers and other weaponry went from house to house arresting those identified as rioters. Pregnant women and children were made to lie on the floor while the laser lights of police rifles played over their faces. Nineteen men were flown off the island — one for each cop trapped in the barracks — and their bail conditions banned them from returning home.

Eighteen months later, most of the officers who served on that day filed Victim Impact Statements. (The first step towards receiving compensation.) These documents are revealing — and disturbing — for their frank descriptions of racial fear and loathing. One officer wrote that his children no longer played sport on the weekend because they didn’t want to mix with Aboriginal kids. Another wrote: “I do not trust indigenous people for fear of violence…if they can try to burn my body, they will burn and hurt my loved ones.” Another wrote that he stayed up all night guarding his infant son because he was scared Palm Islanders would find his house and attack him. More than one officer claimed that they wanted vengeance: “Right or wrong,” one said, “I have harboured unhealthy desires to seek revenge which often consume all my thoughts.”

If payback was a common desire then surely the police have now had their fill. In June 2007, Senior Sergeant Hurley, despite having been found responsible for Doomadgee’s death by the Queensland Deputy State Coroner, was acquitted of manslaughter in three hours by an all white Townsville jury. By contrast, last week Lex Wotton was found guilty of rioting with destruction — a crime which carries a maximum sentence of life imprisonment.

One of the officers who will soon be able to look at the bravery award on his mantelpiece and contemplate his courage and sacrifice will be Detective Sergeant Darren Robinson. Hurley’s close friend, Robinson flew to Palm Island the day of Doomadgee’s death to investigate the matter. He had previously investigated Hurley’s behaviour, including allegations that the Senior Sergeant had run over a woman’s foot and left her lying on the ground. Despite the woman requiring surgery, Robinson declared her claims were “fictitious”.

The Crime and Misconduct Commission has since recommended the Queensland Police Service consider disciplinary action over the incident, although none has been taken. The Police Service is also unlikely to take action against the officers involved in the investigation of Cameron Doomadgee’s death, despite the Deputy Coroner’s findings of wilful incompetence.

Doomadgee’s death triggered a kind of war — with Hurley becoming a battle martyr not only for cops who feel they are victims, but for anyone who believes blacks get too much from the system. At every juncture, the Police Service’s handling of the case has shown the vast gulf between physical bravery and moral bravery. Next week, while the police hold their awards ceremony in Townsville, over the water on Palm Island the Aboriginal Council might consider giving their own series of awards for hypocrisy, humbug, and hubris.

Chloe Hooper is the author of The Tall Man, published by Penguin.

We recommend

From around the web

Powered by Taboola


Leave a comment

17 thoughts on “Chloe Hooper: In search of Palm Island’s true victims

  1. Marilyn

    I am watching with sickened disgust the “First Australian’s” and find myself weeping at the end of every episode. I found out a year ago that my own great-grandfather led an “abo hunt” in my home district and they wiped out an entire tribe just over 100 years ago. After more than 20 years of working on things like the ATSIC legislation, the book “Survival in our own Land” (which still sells after 20 years) from John Coulter’s office, marching with the aboriginal and other people in 1988 for peace, hope and justice and varying other activities for aboriginal rights I find that I was just a pig ignorant moron.

    I am also reading “The Tall Man” and what strikes me is that the treatment of and language towards those people on Palm Island prison is no different to the treatment and language in 18th century NSW, or 19th century Tasmania and Victoria, nor early 20th century Northern Territory or middle of the century country wide. Shameful isn’t it?

    I was lucky enough to meet Yami Lester 20 years ago. He is a great, great man.

    Then we see this week that Wotton is convicted of riot, yet he broke it up.

    And the stupid media report that the Devil’s Marbles have been handed back after “a 28 year battle”. Maybe there was a 28 year battle through the courts but what about the other 200 years of dispossession?

    The media language, the police language, the language has to change.

  2. dermot

    Kate you claim mistakes and that is all you can offer. riiiight. also what makes you an authority?

  3. Kate

    for a start Chris Hurley’s mother never attended the trial, as stated in the book – I don’t know who the lady was who was identified as his mum, but it certainly wasn’t her! It’s not the biggest mistake in the world, but it shows the novel isn’t accurate in its entirety. As I said, the language in the book is lyrical, emotional, well-crafted – just don’t assume it’s actually correct.

  4. Cathy

    Apologies take two…he appeared on 7 just scroll the calendar to hear how Peter Beattie ran the state circa Palm Island.

  5. Kate

    hey Stuart, there’s no denying the lady’s got a way with words – it’s a great ‘yarn’ – but let’s not pretend that the book is non-fiction! There’s a number of factual errors in it (including misidentification of key people) which I understand has been referred on for possible legal action. Of course a defamation action may not eventuate, but the fact that anyone vaguely connected to the case can pick big holes in the book indicates flawed research

  6. Stuart

    thanks John, allways good to get the perspective of someone on the ground. Hooper intimates that the prosecution made some mistakes with the jury and the location. I dont begrudge any policeman recognition of bravey, but I think the more important issue of a ‘willfully incompetent’ investigation must not be swept under the carpet.

  7. John

    I have worked on Palm Island and I attended most of Christopher Hurley’s trial in Townsville. I thought Chloe’s depiction of the trial was spot on. I particularly appreciated her depiction of the “us and them” feeling in the courtroom and surrounds. My own view is that it was right that Hurley face trial. I must admit that after hearing the evidence, I was a little surprised by the verdict, but that’s what juries are for.

    The bravery awards seem unjustified to me. While the situation was undoubtedly terrifying for the police inside the barracks, other than getting away, what did they do that deserves special commendation? They were terrified and they got away. Is “being brave” enough to get a medal?