Sydney Morning Herald columnist Paul Sheehan had many things to say on Monday about the challenge of migration.

But the last paragraph — where he called some refugees “parasites” — stole the show.

Sure, the overall tone of his piece was alarmist. Eg. “Under the Rudd Government, Australia’s net immigration intake is now larger than Britain’s, even though it has almost three times the population of Australia.”

And that’s before you count New Zealanders, he said.

It wasn’t until the end that he really fired up.

Noting that the Rudd government must explain its immigration processes, Sheehan warned that “thousands of Australian [sic] have paid a heavy price for the failed refugee-vetting processes in the 1970s and 1980s, when thousands of parasites who should never have been allowed into the country were approved [Crikey’s emphasis].”

Sheehan’s “parasites” are now Australians too, but perhaps not the right kind.  

Within three hours of being online, the copy had been amended on The SMH website to read: “Thousands of Australian [sic] have paid a heavy price for the failed refugee-vetting processes in the 1970s and 1980s, when many people who should never have been allowed into the country were approved.”

PC balance was restored. (Apparently, the sensibilities of Queenslanders are not quite so delicate — the original version is still up on the Brisbane Times.)

But how had it got through in the first place with its vilifying taint? After all, it would have been subbed and possibly legaled. And just what did Sheehan mean? Could he really be railing against the influx of Vietnamese boat people during the 70s and 80s?

Not at all. It seems he was returning to a favourite topic: Lebanese Muslims (in Sydney).

After civil war broke out in Lebanon, around 14,000 Lebanese Muslims migrated to Australia between 1975 and 1977.

As the the National Archives recount, at this time, “the pace and scale of Lebanese-Muslim migration changed dramatically … Most arrivals continued to be sponsored by existing residents, but many of the usual requirements for entry into Australia (such as health and security checks) were held in abeyance or waived on humanitarian grounds.”

In April, Sheehan was also dishing it out to Tongan “morons” who, because they were violent, are “regrettably, Australian citizens”:   

…last Monday a group of violent racists acted out their YouTube fantasies and stormed into Merrylands High School at 8.50am, armed with machetes and baseball bats. They then started to beat the crap out of people.

A week after this rampage, any member of the public interested in this crime could have deduced the alleged perpetrators were Tongan morons. Or perhaps morons who are, regrettably, Australian citizens but portray themselves as “nigga gangstas”.

In the article, titled “White lies about dark crimes”, he referred to Cronulla’s “violent, racist Lebanese Muslim men”.


We couldn’t finish up this week’s Wankley without a special mention to Channel Ten news. The hypocrisy of their story on Nicole Kidman bringing Sunday Rose to Australia was truly impressive.

While detailing Kidman’s privacy concerns for her one-month-old, Ten’s entertainment reporter Angela Bishop went to the frontline, embedding herself with the paps to report on their invasiveness, as the Channel Ten cameras got all the footage.

Peter Fray

Save up to 50% on a year of Crikey.

This extraordinary year is almost at an end. But we know that time waits for no one, and we won’t either. This is the time to get on board with Crikey.

For a limited time only, choose what you pay for a year of Crikey.

Save up to 50% or dig deeper so we can dig deeper.

See you in 2021.

Peter Fray
Editor-in-chief of Crikey

SAVE 50%