The Weekend Australian, June 21-22, was extraordinary: one long tirade against the Rudd Government and its senior staff.
- Page 1: “Anger builds around Rudd as chaos reigns at the top” by John Lyons
- Page 18 Main editorial: “Office of PM is more than a one-man band – Kevin Rudd must change his style and his staff”
- Page 19 Front page of Inquirer: “Inner Circle – John Lyons reveals the workings of Kevin Rudd’s office and asks: is the PM becoming Captain Chaos?”
- Page 26: “Politics of style over substance – We have entered the era of the perpetual political campaign, writes George Megalogenis”
- Page 27: “Hostile approach to the media – Aggression and bullying tactics have become the hallmarks of Kevin Rudd’s office, and women have particular cause for complaint, reports John Lyons.”
Plus Bill Leak’s cartoon depicting Rudd’s senior office staff as babies in napkins.
To give some context to this monster spray, it is necessary to wind back the clock. On May 8, as Rudd appeared outside the new Fairfax Media headquarters in Ultimo to conduct the official opening, Oz reporter John Lyons appeared from nowhere to ask the PM some questions.
Rudd’s security detail moved forward and bundled Lyons out of the way. The security personnel were edgy for explicable reasons.
A short time before, a man had entered the nearby Star City Casino and shot a 30-year-old woman in the stomach before running into the surrounding area wearing a disguise and carrying weapons. The whole area was in police lockdown as they hunted the streets for him and any accomplices.
Lyons found himself on national television and he complained about being “manhandled” while performing his duties.
What was he doing there? Let us wind back the clock a bit further. In 1998, Lyons was editor of the Fairfax flagship, The Sydney Morning Herald. He was sacked after he was photographed drinking with the then chairman and CEO of News Ltd, Lachlan Murdoch, and Col Allan, editor of the Herald’s rival paper, The Daily Telegraph.
What genius at The Oz decided it would be a wheeze to send Lyons to Fairfax Media’s big day to blindside Rudd with some impromptu questions and act as party-pooper? Doesn’t sound like something that would have been approved by John Hartigan, the current chairman and CEO, who is noted for good judgment as well as commonsense.
In between leaving Fairfax and joining News, Lyons worked for the late Kerry Packer at The Bulletin and then the Sunday program. He last caused media waves with his Bulletin front-page hatchet job on Paul Keating in 2005, which drew this protest from PJK loyalist Mark Ryan, now with Westfields:
Casual readers of John Lyons’ article on Paul Keating might not recognise it, but those of us familiar with his malicious style of journalism can truly say it was Lyons at his worst. His article failed every test of relevance, public interest and fairness.
Now Lyons has turned his guns on Rudd saying, among other things, his team is too youthful. For the record, when Gough Whitlam became PM in 1972 his chief of staff was 33-year-old Peter Wilenski (now deceased), 34-year-old Eric Walsh (Canberra lobbyist) was his press secretary, 26-year-old Jim Spigelman (now NSW Chief Justice) was his senior adviser and 23-year-old Michael Delaney (now executive director of the Motor Trades Association of Australia) was also on the policy team.
The trouble with Rudd’s team is not its age nor its brutalism (how would the shrinking violets of the Canberra Press Gallery have survived in London when Sir Bernard Ingham handled Margaret Thatcher’s PR or when Alistair Campbell rode shotgun for Tony Blair, or covered the White House during the Bill Clinton and George Bush years?).
Keating told Lateline on June 7 last year what was wrong with Rudd’s team:
They’ll do him no good. Because in the end those kind of conservative tea-leaf-reading focus group driven polling types who I think led Kim (Beazley) into nothingness, he’s got his life to repent in leisure now at what they did to him. They’re back, they’re back.
The Labor Party is not going to profit from having these proven unsuccessful people around who are frightened of their own shadow and won’t get out of bed in the morning unless they’ve had a focus group report to tell them which side of bed to get out.
These are, in my opinion, no value people. Wouldn’t fight, don’t know how to fight, much less fighting the Liberal Party.
As so often is the case, Keating was on the money.

7 thoughts on “The Australian’s incredible anti-Rudd tirade”
fay
June 23, 2008 at 2:08 pmoh gee, Kev gets some bad press and you get upset…
Bernard Freedman
June 23, 2008 at 5:28 pmComparing the youthful staff supporting Kevin Rudd with the Gough Whitlam’s young staffers misses an important point: Peter Wilenski and Jim Spigelman were not simply young they had brilliant intellects. With Eric Walsh and Michael Delaney they made a great team with with very special qualities and experience lacking in the current young men supporting Kevin Rudd.
claret
June 23, 2008 at 2:19 pmIt isn’t just this weekend’s Australian – I sent them a letter last week complaining about the anti-Rudd bias that has been in their reporting for ages. In todays paper Glenn Milne suggests that if Labor doesn’t win the upcoming by-election then Rudd will be at fault! No government has ever won a by-election needing a 6% swing! Is Milne ‘tired and emotional’ again? Rudd hasn’t threatened Rupert’s monopoly has he? Perhaps the Howard apologist journos are getting revenge, either way it’s time the Australian got back to reporting instead of biased commentory about nothing.
Ian McLaren
June 23, 2008 at 4:50 pmSeems as though Rupert has instructed all the lickspittles to lift their game. The one who sinks lower than the gutter wins. Ackerman, Bolt and Milne for the trifecta
curious
June 23, 2008 at 7:11 pmCurious, that your excuse for Rudd’s in-experienced advisors is that Gough had very inexperienced advisors.
I was under the impression that Gough was the absolute worst PM this country has had and that we just recovered from his wholesale ransacking of the economy.
Perhaps we’re in for another Gough-like government.
Oh Joy.
dermot j mcguire
June 23, 2008 at 8:03 pmworst PM? the PM who gave us free university education provided funds for sewerage in areas of Sydney Melbourne and Brisbane?
Read your history
worst PM? Billy McMahon followede by Stanley Bruce.
as tothe young genius line when the whitlam advisers started they were unknowns and some performed in less than clever ways tillthey hit their straps. finally willenski a Genius b—s–t!
Bob Cole
June 23, 2008 at 3:03 pmThe problem with Rudd is he is trained as a diplomat.
Sucessful politicians and sucessful diplomats are very rare and in the case of Rudd his training is well to the forfront in that he is a diplomat through and through. We are in an era of appeasement. Appeasement of the elements of the labour party, appeasement of the Union movement, attempts to appease business and of course appeasement of the International arena.
For goodness sake Mr Rudd you have not really changed from when I first met you as the newly endorsed candidate for Griffith in that horrible cross left and right deal within with the labour movement. You see it’s been part of the Rudd entry to politics and he always has had to watch his back as Con Scaccia, jim Elder found and Anna Bligh benefited.
Rudd make Australia your first priority not unions or labour pollies or in house deals. Australia needs strong leadership.
One area one could start is to make Australian citizenship worth of being Australian Not to be shared but if one is Australian one is not dual. I’m sick of having to pick up the pieces from those who entrer a country under a shared citizenship get into trouble and call on Australia to get them out. Please you enter as a xxxxx then that is what you are, not a part time Australian.
Make Austrralia proud, make us proud to be Australian and be decisive in your management of this country.