May 23, 2008

Newman’s stunt puts the skids on Footy Show audience

The audience of the AFL Footy Show is voting with it's feet and Nine boss David Gyngell is doing nothing writes Glenn Dyer.

The Nine Network and its chief executive, David Gyngell, have failed to protect the reputation of the network’s AFL Footy Show franchise in Melbourne, a failure revealed in the plunge in the audience of the once-dominant program.

Since the Sam Newman atrocity against football writer Caroline Wilson on 10 April, the average 9.30pm to 11pm audience has dropped by 16%, while the show is off more than 20% from the peak audience achieved in those seven weeks.

Free Trial

Proudly annoying those in power since 2000.

Sign up for a FREE 21-day trial to keep reading and get the best of Crikey straight to your inbox

By starting a free trial, you agree to accept Crikey’s terms and conditions


Leave a comment

2 thoughts on “Newman’s stunt puts the skids on Footy Show audience

  1. Theo Zographos

    The Footy Show (AFL) has always been focused on capturing the Melbourne audience. Adelaide and Perth are a bonus. National figures which include the NRL share are irrelevant. The Melbourne share has hovered at 380,000 for the past 3 years and spikes up 65,000 on average when the show generates publicity outside of broadcast and in the lead up. After 15 years, these numbers are excpetional and are testament to Newman’s marketability.

  2. Sarah

    I’ve literally stopped watching Channel 9 altogether. Even Underbelly, which I’ll get on DVD (I’ll get to see it uncut that way anyway). The constant pandering to the contemptible Tony Grieg was bad enough. The “boning” of Jessica Rowe made me seriously angry – OK, she was hopeless, but it was concerning that the efforts to fix Today simply consisted of cycling endless female co-hosts past Karl Stefanovic, like they were the only possible reason the show was tanking. And it bothered me that Maguire should use a word usually indicative of sexual activity to describe what he intended to do to Rowe – it gives a pretty clear impression of how he regards women generally. The sacking of Christine Spiteri and some of the racist and sexist comments made about her by management only bolster my unease. But the fact that this network not only continues to employ the truly disgusting Newman, but defends him, is both unforgivable and really, really unsettling. As a woman it is actually quite scary to think that there are still people out there who do not find this behaviour absolutely unacceptable. I absolutely will not watch anything on Channel 9 any more; I do not care how much I want to see it. Thank you, Crikey, for the list of sponsors. I have already opened an account with ANZ, and I will be writing to each of the other sponsors asking whether they endorse Newman’s behaviour, and if not, why do they continue to sponsor this abysmal, unfunny, pathetic exercise in atavism. And are men not embarrassed and ashamed and offended by this sort of behaviour? Or is this really what men think women deserve?

Share this article with a friend

Just fill out the fields below and we'll send your friend a link to this article along with a message from you.

Your details

Your friend's details