Christian Kerr does not need to pussy-foot around the question of push polling. There is no need for the media buffs to wonder if the Galaxy questions were push polling – at least one of them bloody was.
This is both a disgrace and a warning. A disgrace because this kind of work is unprofessional and is likely to mislead the public, and a warning because as the ultimate poll approaches the temptation for the spinners of all kinds to lean on pollsters to ask dicey questions will increase.
Let’s look at this sorry example. The question asked and the results reported, as referred in Crikey on 7 June was:
Which of the following concerns, if any, do you have about the prospect of Kevin Rudd and the Labor Party running the Australian economy?
Trade Unions would have too much influence
Interest rates would be likely to rise
The Rudd team is too inexperienced
A Rudd government would run up too much debt
The report states: “These surveys were conducted by Galaxy Research. The most recent survey was administered on the weekend of 1-3 June. The results are based on the opinions of 1021 voters. The data has been weighted and projected to reflect the Australian population”.
You can reflect the demographic profile of the Australian population – but you can’t make sense out of bad questions.
How is the question bad? To be unbiased each of these phrases should have been offered with its opposite and the respondent asked to choose between them. For example:
If Kevin Rudd and the Labor Party were running the Australian economy (even that we don’t like, it might be better to ask “If there were a Labor government”) would the trade unions
Have too much power
Not have too much power
And so on. There are other ways it could be done but certainly not the way it was done. We hope there will not be more to come but we fear there may be.