The single most useful working definition of mental illness – doing the same thing over and over in expectation of a different result – will serve as a summary of the rearguard action taking place in the Iraq war.
Not the rearguard action in the actual war – allied troops disarming and in some cases firing on the Iraqi troops/police/militias that are meant to be replacing them – but that of the pundits who can’t believe that the West has not only lost, but created a disaster with no visible limit. The latest strategy, beloved of Christopher Hitchens, Euston Manifesto supremo Oliver Kamm, and Bush and Blair of course, is to argue that a quick or timetabled departure would be a fresh betrayal of the Iraqi people.
Now Michael Gawenda has weighed in with same thought.
There's more to Crikey than you think.
Get more Crikey for just
The one voice that isn’t being listened to is that of the Iraqi people – strange because it is regularly available on iraqanalysis.com, a collation of all opinion polls being taken in the country.
The results of recent polls collected there show variously:
70% want a withdrawal of US troops within a year (September 2006). The same number believe continued occupation is making the situation worse.
This is up from 50% at the start of the year.
75% across the board support insurgency attacks against civilian troops, with 23% supporting it very strongly. This goes as high as 88% among Sunnis, but is at 41% even among Shias.
A 2005 poll say that fewer than 1% strongly believe that continued occupation is helping the country
The polls differ in magnitude, but they all go in the same direction – a rapid and announced withdrawal is the clearly expressed wish all over Iraq.
The only place you won’t hear it is in the desperate rearguard of the punditocracy.