If you’re a Democrat in America — where your party has just grabbed control of the House of Representatives – the system works. As predicted by polls and pundits, the US mid-term elections have just produced a major swing against the incumbent Republicans, primarily driven by popular disdain for the American role in the Iraq war (see stories in today’s edition).

But if you’re a Democrat in Australia – where your vote yesterday sealed the controversial stem cell legislation 34-32 in the Senate – the system works in a rather different way. As Democrat Senator Andrew Bartlett admits with refreshing candour on his blog:

I would have preferred the extra day or two to think further about the matter and discuss my concern with others, and I really didn’t reach a conclusive view in my head about how I would vote until the very final minutes…

Those in favour of the legislation seemed to be keen to just bring on the final vote as soon as possible – I presume because they had such a slim margin in favour and they were worried that waverers might change their view overnight.

My lack of enthusiasm for the vote I ended up casting in favour was such that it is possible I would have taken a different view tomorrow, so I guess in that sense their strategy worked…

And when we asked the Senator this morning whether he’d had second thoughts overnight, he was ever more candid: “I’m still not convinced I did the right thing”.

The system works. Sort of.

Peter Fray

Get your first 12 weeks of Crikey for $12.

Without subscribers, Crikey can’t do what it does. Fortunately, our support base is growing.

Every day, Crikey aims to bring new and challenging insights into politics, business, national affairs, media and society. We lift up the rocks that other news media largely ignore. Without your support, more of those rocks – and the secrets beneath them — will remain lodged in the dirt.

Join today and get your first 12 weeks of Crikey for just $12.


Peter Fray
Editor-in-chief of Crikey