Five years on, the “war on terror” continues with no end in sight. So you’d think that more research into the motives and methods of terrorist groups would be just what we need. Well, not necessarily.

Consider the sad case of Flinders University sociologist Riaz Hassan, as reported in this morning’s Australian. Hassan received an $829,000 grant from the Australian Research Council for a study on suicide bombers, as part of which he proposed “to seek interviews with the leadership of a number of terrorist organisations”. But a polite word from Attorney-General Philip Ruddock warned him that doing so could breach Australia’s new anti-terrorism laws.

According to The Australian, Ruddock said that “it was an offence to associate with terrorists” and “academics needed to consider who they chose to interview”.

I’d hazard a guess that when most people support (as I’m sure they do) making it a crime to “associate” with terrorists, they’re thinking of someone who actually socialises with them — hanging out with them, being seen together regularly, and therefore presumably sharing in some of their plans and conspiracies. That’s a very different thing from interviewing them as part of a serious academic project.

One of the things everyone agrees on about 11 September is that it was an intelligence failure. But the government’s ham-fisted response to terrorism may actually prevent the collection of data on the organisations that threaten us. As Hassan said in his grant application, his study would “advance knowledge, which should be relevant to protecting Australia from threats of terrorism and providing information which may contribute to the development of appropriate responses”.

Hassan is going ahead with the study, but has dropped the face-to-face terrorist interviews. Let’s hope that doesn’t mean he misses out on some precious nugget of information that could prevent a future attack.

Peter Fray

Support journalism that makes things better, not worse.

Rupert Murdoch had never had a US president in his pocket before Donald Trump landed there in 2016.

This week, we explored the relationship between the two men and why Murdoch should be held to account for the making of Trump.

Where do you start with dismantling the media empire that delivered us a phenomenon like Trump?

Here’s one thing you can do: Support the journalism that makes things better, not worse.

Subscribe to Crikey today with the promo code MADEMEN and get 50% off an annual membership.

Hurry, 48 hours only.

Peter Fray
Editor-in-chief of Crikey

JOIN NOW