Well, the team picked for the government’s one-day history teaching summit is out,
and one can only applaud their subtlety. Earlier hopes/fears that the group
would be a hardcore stack have not prevailed – no Windschuttle, no Bolt, no
Akerman. But nor is it a full and balanced representation of the views of
Australian history across the profession and its hinterlands.

A moment’s glance at the list of participants will
show why (Note: the designation refers to people’s public positions
– ie. I don’t know who Inga Clendinnen votes for, but her work doesn’t have
a clear political orientation):

Jackie Huggins*

Left: Jenny Gregory*, Margo Neale*

Centre Conservative: Geoffrey Bolton*, Inga Clendinnen*, Kate Darian-Smith*, Tom
Stannage* , Tony Taylor*, Mark Lopez*

John Gascoigne*, Gerard Henderson, Peter Stanley*, John
Hirst*, Bob Carr, Paul Kelly, Gregory Melleuish*, Geoffrey Partington, Geoffrey

Affiliation Unknown:
Andrew Barnett, Nick Ewbank, Jennifer Lawless, Lise Paul (DEST rep)

*professional historians

Several things are immediately obvious: first, even
if one or two people in the “centre” column shifted into the left, the damn
thing would still be skewed right.

Secondly, there’s a clear absence of other big left
names: no Henry Reynolds, Marilyn Lake, Humphrey McQueen, Patricia Grimshaw,
Mary Kalantzsis, Don Watson, Lyndell Ryan. Stuart MacIntyre was invited, but
was unavailable – in which case, if a genuinely pluralist approach was wanted,
someone else of a pinkish hue should have been chosen. I can’t believe they were
all unavailable. Gender and ethnicity-wise it’s skewed as well.

Thirdly, the right side is stacked with men on a
mission, three of them non-professional ring-ins. Henderson, Hirst and Kelly (journo, not
singer) need no explanation on this score. Melleuish writes for the CIS,
Partington for the IPA. Blainey will either be serene conservative or
penny-dreadful scrapper depending upon mood.

Fourthly, in a one-day conference, no-one is liable
to get a word in edgewise apart from the right warriors, who are practised at
this sort of thing, and would need balancing with equal and opposite
broken-bottle wielders if it was to be a fair fight.

So it’s a stitch-up – but by leaving out the most
high-profile nasties, the government will be able to present it as a process of
consensus. New direction etc etc. Following the conference, one presumes the process of
drafting a national narrative-based curriculum will begin – at which point the
fun will really start.

Any of the above who don’t like the team they’re on
see me at lunchtime.

Peter Fray

Save 50% on a year of Crikey and The Atlantic.

The US election is in a little over a month. It seems that there’s a ridiculous twist in the story, almost every day.

Luckily for new Crikey subscribers, we’ve teamed up with one of America’s best publications, The Atlantic for the election race. Subscribe now to make sense of it all, and you’ll get a year of Crikey (usually $199) and a year’s digital subscription to The Atlantic (usually $70AUD), BOTH for just $129.

Peter Fray
Editor-in-chief of Crikey