“It’s almost like watching a ballgame played without the ball,” Janet Maslin said.

The former New York Times film critic was reflecting on the burgeoning buzz around the Academy Awards, in a year of distinctly unbuzzy competition.

Amid the modest, tasteful contenders, there is no Titanic—let alone a Dances with Wolves—to provoke fisticuffs about art versus commerce.

But
that doesn’t stop the commerce. “The big pile of cash that’s still
using a lot of newspaper advertising is Hollywood,” said one
ad-industry observer. “And that’s why they’re going like crazy to it.”

And
the press, in turn, is creating a hospitable editorial environment for
the movie ads—reserving space in print and on the Web for writing about
the Academy Awards, whether there’s anything worth saying or not.
http://www.observer.com/20060227/20060227_Tom_Scocca_pageone_coverstory1.asp

Peter Fray

Get your first 12 weeks of Crikey for $12.

Without subscribers, Crikey can’t do what it does. Fortunately, our support base is growing.

Every day, Crikey aims to bring new and challenging insights into politics, business, national affairs, media and society. We lift up the rocks that other news media largely ignore. Without your support, more of those rocks – and the secrets beneath them — will remain lodged in the dirt.

Join today and get your first 12 weeks of Crikey for just $12.

 

Peter Fray
Editor-in-chief of Crikey

JOIN NOW