Imagine that Einstein, Fermi and
Oppenheimer set out to commercialise the intellectual property (IP) involved in
Einstein’s famous equation, Fermi’s ability to build a nuclear reactor, using
Oppenheimer’s labour with Australia’s tax law.

This is the thought experiment
provided yesterday evening by Professor Cameron Rider on the Intellectual
Property Research Institute of Australia (IPRIA). The seminar was jointly
sponsored by the Australian Institute for Commercialisation (AIC) and PricewaterhouseCoopers (PWC).

Australia’s tax laws are “very old-fashioned
when they come to treatment of intellectual property”. This is the theme of
Rider’s analysis, which he believes helps to explain the difficulties involved
in “the daunting challenge of R&D commercialisation” in Australia.
There are four major obstacles that, taken together, reduce resources put into
R&D commercialisation and/or drive it offshore. The problems are compounded
by the fact that use of a company structure is strongly encouraged by several
forces, not least corporations law.

Dr Ken Henry, please get a copy of
IPRIA’s Report number 01/06 – “Taxation Problems in the Commercialisation of
Intellectual Property” – and read it carefully. Treasurer Peter Costello, here
is an important part of the tax reform jigsaw.

Read Henry Thornton’s full summary
here

Peter Fray

Save 50% on a year of Crikey and The Atlantic.

The US election is in a little over a month. It seems that there’s a ridiculous twist in the story, almost every day.

Luckily for new Crikey subscribers, we’ve teamed up with one of America’s best publications, The Atlantic for the election race. Subscribe now to make sense of it all, and you’ll get a year of Crikey (usually $199) and a year’s digital subscription to The Atlantic (usually $70AUD), BOTH for just $129.

Peter Fray
Editor-in-chief of Crikey

JOIN NOW